Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 815-500-1 | CAS number: 1853175-99-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Oral LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw (OECD 423, K, Rel.1)
Dermal LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw (OECD 402, K, Rel.1)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 22 July to 6 August, 2015.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- GLP study conducted in compliance with OECD Guideline No. 423 with minor deviation: a relative humidity higher than 70% was registered only in one day. This deviation does not affect the quality of the study.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
- Version / remarks:
- 17 December 2001.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- a relative humidity higher than 70% was registered only in one day. The maximum value measured was 71%. This deviation do not affect the quality of the study and are not considered to be relevant.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.1 tris (Acute Oral Toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- a relative humidity higher than 70% was registered only in one day. The maximum value measured was 71%. This deviation do not affect the quality of the study and are not considered to be relevant.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Inspected on 2013-06-3&4 / Signed on 2013-09-13
- Test type:
- acute toxic class method
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Elevage JANVIER (53940 Le Genest St Isle, France)
- Age at study initiation: 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 174 - 204 g
- Housing: housed by group of three in solid-bottomed clear polycarbonate cages with a stainless steel mesh lid.
- Diet: foodstuff (A04, SAFE), ad libitum but food was removed at D-1 and then redistributed 4 hours after the test item administration.
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 19-25 °C
- Humidity: 30-70%
- Air changes: at least ten changes per hour.
- Photoperiod: 12 h light/12 h darkness.
IN-LIFE DATES: From 22 July to 06 August 2015. - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on oral exposure:
- MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 2.11 mL/kg bw
ADMINISTRATION OF TEST ITEM:
Animals received an effective dose of 2000 mg/kg bw of the test item, administered by force-feeding under a volume of 2.11 mL/kg bw using a suitable syringe graduated fitted with an oesophageal metal canula. - Doses:
- 2000 mg/kg bw
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 6 females
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Animals were observed 30 min, 1, 3 and 4 hours after test item administration and thereafter once daily for 14 days. Animals were weighed pretest (Day 0) and on Day 2, 7 and 14.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: Yes; Animals were killed on Day 14 and subjected to macroscopic examination. - Statistics:
- None
- Preliminary study:
- Not applicable
- Key result
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: No mortality occurred during the study.
- Key result
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50 cut-off
- Effect level:
- > 5 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- No mortality occurred during the study.
- Clinical signs:
- other: No clinical signs related to the administration of the test item were observed during the study.
- Gross pathology:
- The macroscopic axamination of the animals at the end of the study did not reveal treatment related changes.
- Other findings:
- None
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Under the test conditions, the oral LD50 for test substance is higher than 2000 mg/kg bw and the LD50 cut-off may be considered to be higher than 5000 mg/kg bw in female rats. Therefore, the substance is not classified according to the annex I of the Regulation EC No. 1272/2008 (CLP) and to the GHS.
- Executive summary:
In an acute oral toxicity study (limit test) performed according to OECD Guideline 423 and in compliance with GLP, 6 female Sprague Dawley rats were given a single oral (gavage) dose of test item at 2000 mg/kg bw. Animals were then observed for mortality, clinical signs and bodyweights for 14 days and were all sacrificed for macroscopic examination.
No mortality occurred during the study. No clinical signs related to the administration of the test item were observed during the study. The body weight evolution of the animals remained normal throughout the study, similar between treated and control animals. The macroscopical examination of the animals at the end of the study did not reveal treatment-related changes.
Under the test conditions, the oral LD50 for test substance is higher than 2000 mg/kg bw and the LD50 cut-off may be considered to be higher than 5000 mg/kg bw in female rats. Therefore, the substance is not classified according to the annex I of the Regulation EC No. 1272/2008 (CLP) and to the GHS.
This study is considered as acceptable and satisfies the requirement for acute oral toxicity endpoint.
Reference
None
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- The key study is GLP compliant and of high quality.
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Between 22 July and 05 August, 2015.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- GLP study conducted in compliance with OECD Guideline No. 402 with minor deviation: a relative humidity higher than 70% was registered. The maximum value measured was 71%. This deviation is considered as without impact on the conclusion of the study.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- Version / remarks:
- 24 February 1987.
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- A relative humidity higher than 70% was registered. The maximum value measured was 71%. This deviation is considered as without impact on the conclusion of the study.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- A relative humidity higher than 70% was registered. The maximum value measured was 71%. This deviation is considered as without impact on the conclusion of the study.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Inspected on 2013-06-3&4 / Signed on 2013-09-13.
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Elevage JANVIER (539040 Le Genest St Isle-France)
- Age at study initiation: 7 weeks (males) and 8 weeks (females)
- Weight at study initiation: 231 - 255 g (males) and 206 - 219 g (females).
- Housing: Animals were housed individually during the 24 h exposure period and in groups of five by sex for the remainder of the study in solid-bottomed clear polycarbonate cages with a stainless steel mesh lid.
- Diet: foodstuff (SAFE - A04), ad libitum
- Water: tap-water (from public distribution), ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature: 19-25 °C
- Humidity: 30-70 %
- Air changes: at least 10 changes/h
- Photoperiod: 12 h dark / 12 h light
IN-LIFE DATES: from 22 July to 05 August, 2015. - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on dermal exposure:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: Back and flank area
- % coverage: approximately 10% of the total body surface area.
- Type of wrap if used: A piece of surgical gauze was placed over the treatment area and semi-occluded with a piece of self-adhesive bandage.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): none reported.
- Time after start of exposure: 24 h
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 2000 mg/kg bw administered under a volume of 2.11 mL/kg bw, during 24 hours.
- Constant volume or concentration used: Yes - Duration of exposure:
- 24 h
- Doses:
- 2000 mg/kg bw
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- not required
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Animals were observed for mortality or clinical signs of toxicity at 1, 3 and 5 h after dosing and subsequently once daily for 14 days. Individual bodyweights were recorded prior to application of the test material on Day 0 and on Days 7 and 14.
- After removal of the dressings and subsequently once daily for fourteen days, the test sites were examined for evidence of primary irritation and scored according to the Draize scale.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: Yes; at the end of the study animals were anaesthetised with sodium pentobarbitol and administration continued to fatal levels. After, they subjected to gross necropsy. - Statistics:
- None
- Preliminary study:
- Not applicable
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: No mortality was observed.
- Mortality:
- No mortality was observed.
- Clinical signs:
- other: - No signs of systemic toxicity were noted during the observation period. - Dermal reactions: slight erythema was noted on the treated area in females of treated group, 48 h post dose. The skin recovered a normal aspect on day 5.
- Gross pathology:
- The macroscopic examination of the animals at the end of the study did not reveal treatment- related changes.
- Other findings:
- None
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Under the test conditions, the dermal LD50 Combined for test substance is higher than 2000 mg/kg bw in rats. Therefore, the substance is not classified according to the annex I of the Regulation EC No. 1272/2008 (CLP) and to the GHS.
- Executive summary:
In an acute dermal toxicity study (limit test) performed according to OECD Guideline No. 402 and in compliance with GLP, a group of Sprague Dawley rats (5/sex) was given a single dermal application of the test material to intact skin of the back and flank area at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bw. Test sites were covered with a semi-occlusive dressing for 24 h. Animals were observed for mortality, clinical signs and bodyweights for 14 days and at the end of the study the surviving animals were sacrificed for macroscopic examination. Skin irritation was assessed and scored according to the Draize scale at 24 h after removal of the dressings and then daily for 14 days.
No mortality or systemic toxicity was observed. Slight erythema was noted on the treated area in females of treated group, 48 h post dose. The skin recovered a normal aspect on day 5. All animals showed gains in body weight over the observation period. No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.
Dermal LD50 Combined > 2000 mg/kg bw
Under the test conditions, the test material is not classified according to the annex I of the Regulation EC No. 1272/2008 (CLP) and to the GHS.
This study is considered as acceptable and satisfies the requirement for acute dermal toxicity endpoint.
Reference
None
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- The key study is GLP compliant and of high quality.
Additional information
Acute toxicity: oral
A key study was identified (Phycher, 2015, rel.1). In this acute oral toxic class method study performed according to the OECD guideline No. 423 and in compliance with GLP, six female Sprague Dawley rats received a single oral (gavage) dose of the test substance at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bw. Animals were then observed for mortality, clinical signs and bodyweights for 14 days and were all sacrificed for macroscopic examination.
No mortality occurred during the study. No clinical signs related to the administration of the test item were observed during the study.The body weight evolution of the animals remained normal throughout the study, similar between treated and control animals. The macroscopical examination of the animals at the end of the study did not reveal treatment-related changes.
Oral LD50 > 2000 mg/kg bw
Acute toxicity: dermal
A key study was identified (Phycher, 2015, rel.1). In this acute dermal toxicity study (limit test) performed according to OECD Guideline No. 402 and in compliance with GLP, a group of SD rats (5/sex) was given a single dermal application of the undiluted test material to intact skin of the back and flank area at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bw. Test sites were covered with a semi-occlusive dressing for 24 h. Animals were observed for mortality, clinical signs and bodyweights for 14 days and at the end of the study the surviving animals were sacrificed for macroscopic examination. Skin irritation was assessed and scored according to the Draize scale at 24 h after removal of the dressings and then daily for 14 days.
No mortality or systemic toxicity was observed. Slight erythema was noted on the treated area in females of treated group, 48 h post dose. The skin recovered a normal aspect on day 5. All animals showed gains in body weight over the observation period. No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.
Dermal LD50 Combined > 2000 mg/kg bw
Justification for classification or non-classification
Harmonized classification:
The substance has no harmonized classification according to the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 (CLP).
Self classification:
Acute toxicity (Oral):
Based on the available information, the substance is:
- not classified according to the CLP as the oral LD50 is higher than 2000 mg/kg bw
- not classified according to the GHS since there is no reliable evidence that indicates the LD50 to be in the range of Category 5 values (GHS criteria not met).
Acute toxicity (Dermal):
Based on the available information, the substance is:
- not classified according to the CLP as the dermal LD50 is higher than 2000 mg/kg bw
- not classified according to the GHS since there is no reliable evidence that indicates the LD50 to be in the range of Category 5 values (GHS criteria not met).
Acute toxicity (Inhalation):
No information was available. Not required for substances at the REACH Annex VII tonnage level.
Specific target organ toxicity: single exposure (Oral):
The classification criteria according to CLP and to the GHS are not met since no reversible or irreversible adverse health effects were observed immediately or delayed after exposure and no effects were observed at the guidance value (oral) for a Category 1 classification (C≤ 300 mg/kg bw) and at the guidance value (oral) for a Category 2 classification (2000 mg/kg bw≥C > 300 mg/kg bw). No classification is required.
The criteria for Transient Organ effects (STOT-SE Category 3) according to the CLP and the GHS are not met since narcotic effects were not observed in the acute oral toxicity study.
Specific target organ toxicity: single exposure (Dermal):
The classification criteria according to the CLP and to the GHS are not met since no reversible or irreversible adverse health effects were observed immediately or delayed after exposure and no effects were observed at the guidance value (dermal) for a Category 1 classification (C≤ 1000 mg/kg bw) and at the guidance value (dermal) for a Category 2 classification (2000 mg/kg bw ≥ C > 1000 mg/kg bw). No classification is required.
The criteria for Transient Organ effects (STOT-SE Category 3) according to the CLP and to the GHS are not met since narcotic effects were not observed in the acute dermal toxicity study.
Specific target organ toxicity: single exposure (Inhalation):
No information was available. Not required for substances at the REACH Annex VII tonnage level.
Aspiration hazard:
The substance is not a hydrocarbon and no effects were observed on lungs in oral studies, therefore the criteria for aspiration toxicity according to the CLP and to the GHS are not met.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.