Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 604-582-2 | CAS number: 1472-93-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
To assess reproductive/development toxicity an experimental result has been read across from a supporting substance, structural analogue 9-decanoic acid, methyl ester (EC 662-772-0):
A short-term repeat dose oral toxicity study combined with a reproduction/ developmental toxicity screening test was performed in the rat in accordance with GLP and OECD Guideline 422 . The test item, 9-decenoic acid, methyl ester was administered by gavage to three groups, each of ten male and ten female Wistar Han™:RccHan™:WIST strain rats, for up to eight weeks (including a two week pre-pairing phase, pairing, gestation and early lactation for females), at dose levels of 30, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day. There were no treatment related effects observed on mating, fertility or gestation length at any dose level. The offspring litter size, sex ratio, viability, growth and development were all comparable to controls and no adverse effects were noted. Since no treatment-related effects were observed for reproduction, a NOEL for reproductive toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Remarks:
- based on test type (migrated information)
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- The study was performed between 23 November 2011 and 15 May 2012
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- KL2 due to RA
- Justification for type of information:
- Read-across justification: A comparison target substance (9DDAME) and the read-across substance (9DAME) shows that the two substances share structural similarities, increasing from a chain length of C10 to C12 with similar functional groups and also have ‘mechanistic action’ similarities.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Date of inspection 2011-06-27 to 2011-07-21; Date of signature 2011-08-15
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- arachis oil
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Up to eight weeks (including a two week pre-pairing phase, pairing, gestation and early lactation for females).
- Frequency of treatment:
- Test item was administered daily
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 30, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day. Treatment volume (4 ml/kg) corresponding to concentrations of 7.5, 75 and 250 mg/ml, respectively.
Basis: - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Statistics:
- Where considered appropriate, quantitative data was subjected to statistical analysis to detect the significance of intergroup differences from control; statistical significance was achieved at a level of p<0.05. Statistical analysis was performed on the following parameters: Grip Strength, Motor Activity, Body Weight, Body Weight Change, Food Consumption during gestation and lactation, Haematology, Blood Chemistry, Absolute Organ Weights, Body Weight- Relative Organ Weights
Data were analysed using the decision tree from the ProvantisTM Tables and Statistics Module
Where appropriate, data transformations were performed using the most suitable method. The homogeneity of variance from mean values was analysed using Bartlett’s test. Intergroup variance were assessed using suitable ANOVA, or if required, ANCOVA with appropriate covariates. Any transformed data were analysed to find the lowest treatment level that showed a significant effect, using the Williams Test for parametric data or the Shirley Test for non-parametric data. If no dose response was found, but the data shows non-homogeneity of means, the data were analysed by a stepwise Dunnett’s (parametric) or Steel (non-parametric) test to determine significant difference from the control group. Where the data were unsuitable for these analyses, pair-wise tests was
performed using the Student t-test (parametric) or the Mann-Whitney U test (nonparametric). Data not analysed by the Provantis data capture system were assessed separately using the SPSS statistical package.
Due to the preponderance of non-normally distributed data, reproductive parameters (implantation losses, offspring sex ratio and offspring surface righting) were analysed using non-parametric analyses.
Probability values (p) were calculated as follows:
p<0.001 ***
p<0.01 **
p<0.05 *
p?0.05 (not significant) - Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- Sytemic toxicity
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: The oral administration of the test substance at dose levels of 30, 300 and 1000 mg/kg mg/day did not result in any toxicologically significant effects.
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Remarks:
- Reproductive toxicity
- Effect level:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: There were no treatment-related effects on mating performance
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- Reproductive toxicity
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- ca. 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no treatment related effects on litters when compared to controls
- Critical effects observed:
- no
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- The 'No Observed Effect Level' (NOEL) for reproductive toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day. The NOAEL for systemic toxicity was also considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
- Executive summary:
The reproductive toxicity of the test item 9-dodecenoic acid, methyl ester via the oral route has been read-across from the substance 9-decenoic acid, methyl ester from the following study:
A 28 day repeat dose oral toxicity study combined with a reproduction/ developmental toxicity screening test of the test item was performed in the Wistar rat, according to OECD Guideline 422, in compliance with GLP. The test item, 9-decenoic acid, methyl ester was administered by gavage to three groups, each of ten male and ten female Wistar Han™:RccHan™:WIST strain rats, for up to eight weeks (including a two week pre-pairing phase, pairing, gestation and early lactation for females), at dose levels of 30, 300 and 1000 mg/kg bw/day. There were no treatment related effects observed on mating, fertility or gestation length at any dose level. The offspring litter size, sex ratio, viability, growth and development were all comparable to controls and no adverse effects were noted. Since no treatment-related effects were observed for reproduction, a NOEL for reproductive toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/ day (Harlan Laboratories Ltd, 2012). Based on the results of the read across study, a similar NOEL can be expected for the test item.
Reference
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Species:
- rat
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
Refer to description of OECD 422 results in effects on fertility section.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Species:
- rat
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Under the conditions of the OECD 422 study, conducted on a structural analogue substance, the test item administered to male and female rats up to a dose level of 1000 mg/kg bw/day for a period of up to 8 weeks is not toxic to reproduction and has no effect on fertility or development. No treatment-related effects were observed for reproduction; hence, a NOEL for reproductive toxicity was considered to be 1000 mg/kg bw/day.
Based on these results, octadecanedioic acid, 1,18-dimethyl ester
does not warrant classification according to the criteria described in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.