Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2006-11-27 to 2006-11-30
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2007
Report date:
2007

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Version / remarks:
1987
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
Version / remarks:
1992
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
476-280-7
EC Name:
-
Cas Number:
109113-72-6
Molecular formula:
C10 H9 Cl N2
IUPAC Name:
2-(chloromethyl)-4-methylquinazoline
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
- Physical state: Solid (powder); Off-white with yellow spherical particles

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River (Europe) Laboratories, Inc. Toxi Coop Ltd. 1103 Budapest, Cserkesz u. 90
- Age at study initiation: Young adult rats
- Weight at study initiation: Male: 236 - 267g; Female: 201 - 221g
- Housing: Individual caging (1 animal/cage)
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 15 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +-3°C
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70 %
- Air changes (per hr): 8-12 air exchanges/hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hrs dark/ 12 hrs light

Administration / exposure

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Vehicle:
water
Details on dermal exposure:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: trunk
- % coverage: approx. 10 %
- Type of wrap if used: Sterile gauze pads

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): washing with water was performed
- Time after start of exposure: 24 h

TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 2000 mg/kg bw
- For solids, paste formed: yes (test item in its original form, moistened with 0.5 ml of distilled water)
- Constant volume or concentration used: yes


VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 ml
Duration of exposure:
24 h
Doses:
single dose of 2000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5 animals per sex
Control animals:
not specified
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: on day 0 (beginning of the experiment), on day 7 and on day 14; clinical examination: day of treatment 1h and 5h after the administration and once each day
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Key result
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
None of the test animals died.
Clinical signs:
other: There were no clinical signs. The behaviour and physical condition of animals were considered to be normal. CD 605 caused erythema on the treated skin of male (3/5) and female (5/5) rats, which recovered on days 3 and 4.
Gross pathology:
No macroscopic alterations due to the effects of the test item were found. Gross necropsy revealed pinprick-sized haemorrhages in the lungs both in males (1/5) and in female animals (2/5). The haemorrhages in the lungs were due to the method of anaesthesia and exsanguinations are also observable in untreated animals after anaesthesia.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test item does not meet the criteria for classification as a LD50 of > 2000 mg/kg bw was determined.