Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

The substance gave a non sensitising result in a Guinea Pig Maximisation test.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Additional information:

The substance was tested as formulation (69% active) in two reliable Guinea Pig Maximisation Tests. In the first study (22434 TSG) the results were confounded by irritation in most or all of the test and control animals. The second study (22870 TSG) used a lower challenge concentration and provided evidence of a lack of sensitisation potential.


Migrated from Short description of key information:
The substance gave a non sensitising result in a Guinea Pig Maximisation test.

Justification for selection of skin sensitisation endpoint:
The results of the other study were confounded by irritation and did not allow an assessment of sensitisation potential. Both studies compliant with GLP and testing guidelines.

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Additional information:

Migrated from Short description of key information:
The substance is a liquid or solid paste at room temperature. The vapour pressure is close to 0.2 Pa at 20°C (value is an overestimation as it is based on read-across from coco alkylamine). Also the use of this substance will not result in aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size, so exposure to humans via the inhalation route will be unlikely to occur.

Justification for classification or non-classification

The substance gave a negative response in a GPMT study and is therefore not classified.