Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
28 Feb - 17 Jul 2006
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
Version / remarks:
1992
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
Internal standard solution:
30.0 mg Cyclododecane were dissolved in methanol and made up with methanol to the mark in a 20 ml volumetric flask to prepare a solution of 1500 µg/L. This solution is used as internal standard solution.

Standard solutions:
50.0 mg of the analytical standard were dissolved in acetonitrile and made up with acetonitrile to the mark in a 25 ml volumetric flask (2000 mg/L). 1 ml of this solution was diluted to 20 ml with acetonitrile to prepare a stock solution of 100 mg/L. Defined volumes of this stock solution and an aliquot of the internal standard solution were added to 15 ml water, 2 pellets potassium hydroxide and about 4.5 g sodium sulfate resulting in standard solutions in a range of 0.05 to 12.0 mg test item /I water.
These mixtures were extracted with 4 ml diethylether. The organic extract was used to calibrate the GC-system.
Although the overall method sensitivity may be better, the concentration of the lowest used calibration solution is employed as the limit of quantification.


Sample storage conditions before analysis:
Routinely, the samples are analysed immediately. Only in exceptional cases, they are stored overnight deeply frozen and protected from light.
Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
A direct weighing was prepared to give the desired test concentration. To achieve this 125.3 mg of the test item were added to 1 litre of dilution water and treated with an ultra turrax for 60 seconds at 8000 rpm and afterwards stirred for 1 hour on a magnetic stirrer.
Test organisms (species):
Desmodesmus subspicatus (previous name: Scenedesmus subspicatus)
Details on test organisms:
Source: on-axenic strain of the test species obtained from The Collection of Algal Cultures' of the Institute of Plant Physiology at the University of Gottingen (Germany).
Maintenance of stock cultures: Exponentially-growing stock cultures are maintained in the test facility under constant temperature conditions(23 +/- 2°C) at a light intensity in the range 60 - 120jiE. x m"2 x s"1 (measured in the range 400 to 700 nm using a spherical quantum flux meter). The nutrient medium (according to BRINGMANN & KUHN (1977)is renewed once a week. Cell density measurements are made using a microcell counter.
Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
yes
Total exposure duration:
72 h
Hardness:
None reported.
Test temperature:
None reported.
pH:
8.0-8.8
Nominal and measured concentrations:
nominal: 100 mg/L
meassured: 87.4 - 92.1 mg/L (0 h), 90.9 - 93.9 mg/L (72 h)
Details on test conditions:
Test vessels: 300 ml Erlenmeyer flasks with cotton stoppers
Culturing apparatus: Light chamber in which a temperature in the range 21°C to 25°C can be maintained at +/- 2°C, and continuous uniform illumination is provided in the spectral range 400 to 700 nm.
Light intensity: At the average of the test solutions, a light intensity in the range 60 to 120 μE x m-2 x s-1, or an equivalent range of 4000 to 8000 1x, is recommended to use.
Cell densities are measured in a microcell counter or, alternatively, are determined by means of a microscopic counting chamber.

Experimental design: 1 test concentration plus 1 control; 3 replicates per concentration, 6 replicates per control; initial cell density in the test cultures approximately 5000 cells per millilitre; additionally highest test concentration without algae

Criteria of effects: The criteria of adverse effects used in this study were the item-induced inhibition of growth [b] and growth rate [r], respectively, of the algal population.
Reference substance (positive control):
no
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
> 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
biomass
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
> 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Details on results:
All results are expressed in terms of nominal concentrations. Recovery rates ranged from 87.4 - 92.1% of nominal values at 0 hours, and from 90.9 - 93.9% of nominal values at 72 hours, respectively.
Results with reference substance (positive control):
None.

Validity criteria for the measurement of the algae toxicity













































Target condition according to guideline:Actual condition according to the study:Validity criteria met:
Exponentially growing test organisms are exposed to the test substance in batch cultures over a period of normally 72 hours.

Test organisms: Desmodesmus subspicatus


Test period: 72 h


Yes
The biomass in the control cultures should have increased exponentially by a factor of at least 16 within the 72-hour test period. Cell density in the control flasks after 3 days showed a reproduction rate that was greater than a factor of 16 (factor 81).Yes
The mean coefficient of variation for section-by-section specific growth rates in the control cultures must not exceed 35%.In this specific study, the observed value is 18.6%.Yes
The coefficient of variation of average specific growth rates during the whole test period in replicate control cultures must not exceed 10%.It was 2.05% in this study.Yes
For the final definitive test at least five concentrations, arranged in a geometric series with a factor not exceeding 3.2, should be selected. For test substances showing a flat
concentration response curve a higher factor may be justified. The concentration series should preferably cover the range causing 5-75 % inhibition of algal growth rate.

Test concentration no.: limit test (100 mg/L).


Not applicable
The cultures should be maintained at a temperature in the range of 21 to 24°C, controlled at ± 2°C.21°C to 25°C can be maintained at +/- 2°C.Yes (a small deviation of 1 °C is acceptable)
The pH of the control medium should not increase by more than 1.5 units during the test.pH in the control medium after 0 and 72 h was 8.1 - 8.6, respectively.

Yes



 

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Remarks:
See 'Any other information on results incl. tables'.
Conclusions:
An 72h EC50 of > 100 mg/L was determined for the test substance, as no toxic effects against algae were observed.
Executive summary:

No toxic effects against algae at a concentration of 100 mg/l.

Description of key information

An 72h EC50 of > 100 mg/L was determined for the test substance, as no toxic effects against algae were observed.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

EC50 for freshwater algae:
100 mg/L

Additional information

Should read > 100 mg/L.