Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 941-821-2 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2001
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Guideline study performed under GLP. The source and target substances must have an aldehyde group at the 1-carbon position and either a terminal (10-position) or an internal alkene (9-position or 8-position; with the terminal alkyl group no larger than an ethyl group and/or should not multiply substituted). The substance alkyl chain length of the substance should be more than 6 carbons in length and less than 14 carbons in length and fulfil the mono-alkene definition. The substance should not have any branched alkyl groups or side chains. The target and source share common structural elements in the same relative positions. The source and target have very similar physico-chemical properties and thus have similar expected toxicokinetic behaviour. The substances have similar in silico chemical reactivity predictions. This is observed within available in vivo toxicology testing where low level local and systemic toxicity is demonstrated and comparable between target and source. The substances therefore demonstrate chemical similarity. In the skin sensitisation endpoint, the target and source have common protein reactivity alert(s). The target and source therefore have common foreseen mode of action.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 001
- Report date:
- 2001
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Undec-10-enal
- EC Number:
- 203-973-1
- EC Name:
- Undec-10-enal
- Cas Number:
- 112-45-8
- Molecular formula:
- C11H20O
- IUPAC Name:
- 10-undecenal
- Test material form:
- other: liquid
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: liquid
- Stability under test conditions: The solutions were used as soon as they were prepared to ensure the stability of the test material in solution.
- Storage condition of test material: In the original container in refrigerator (at 3 - 5 °C), away from direct sunlight
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: CBA/Jibm(SPF)
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Recognised animal supplier
- Age at study initiation: 7 - 12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 17.7 - 24.8 g
- Housing: In groups of four in Makrolon type-3 cages with standard softwood bedding
- Diet: standard pellet diet ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22+/- 3
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): 10 - 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 h light / 12 h dark
IN-LIFE DATES: 28-AUG-2001 to 12-SEP-2001
Study design: in vivo (LLNA)
- Vehicle:
- acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
- Concentration:
- 5, 10, 25, 50 and 75%
- No. of animals per dose:
- 4 females
- Details on study design:
- TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
The test item in the main study was assayed at five consecutive concentrations that were selected by the sponsor.
TOPICAL APPLICATION
Each test group of mice was treated by topical (epidermal) application to the dorsal surface of each ear lobe (left and right) with different test item concentrations of 5 %, 10 %, 25 %, 50% and 75% in acetone:olive oil, 4:1 (v/v). The application volume, 25uI, was spread over the entire dorsal surface of each ear lobe once daily for three consecutive days. A further group of mice was treated with an equivalent volume of the relevant vehicle alone (control animals). A hair dryer was used to dry the ear's surface as quickly as possible to avoid loss of test item applied.
ADMINISTRATION OF 3H-METHYL THYMIDINE
3H-methyl thymidine (3HTdR) (specific activity, 2 Ci/mmol; concentration, 1 mCi/ml). Five days after the first topical application, all mice were administered with 250uL of 83.32 uCi/ml 3HTdR (equal to 20.83 uCi 3HTdR) by intravenous injection via a tail vein.
DETERMINATION OF INCORPORATED 3HTDR
Approximately five hours after treatment with 3HTdR all mice were euthanized by intraperitoneal injection of NARCOREN at a dose of at least 2 ml/kg body weight (equivalent to 320 mg sodium pentobarbitone/kg body weight). The draining lymph nodes were rapidly excised and pooled for each experimental group (8 nodes per group). Single cell suspensions (phosphate buffered saline) of pooled lymph node cells were prepared by gentle mechanical disaggregation through stainless steel gauze (200 um mesh size). After washing three times with phosphate buffered saline (approx. 10 ml) the lymph node cells were resuspended in 5 % trichloroacetic acid (approx. 3 ml) and incubated at approximately +4 degrees C overnight for precipitation of macromolecules. The precipitates were then resuspended in 5% trichloroacetic acid (1 ml) and transferred to glass scintillation vials with 10 ml of 'Ultima Gold' scintillation liquid and thoroughly mixed. The level of 3HTdR incorporation was then measured on a beta-scintillation counter. Similarly, background 3HTdR levels were also measured in two 1 ml-aliquots of 5 %trichloroacetic acid. The beta-scintillation counter expresses 3HTdR incorporation as the number of radioactive
disintegrations per minute (DPM). - Positive control substance(s):
- mercaptobenzothiazole (CAS No 149-30-4)
- Statistics:
- The mean values and standard deviations were calculated in the body weight tables. The EC3 value was calculated according to the equation:
EC3 = (a-c) [(3-d)/(b-d)] + c
where EC3 is the estimated concentration of the test item required to produce a 3-fold increase in draining lymph node cell proliferative activity; (a, b) and (c, d) are respectively the co-ordinates of the two pair of data lying immediately above and below the S.l. value of 3 on the local lymph node assay dose response plot.
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- 2-MERCAPTO-BENZOTHIAZOLE showed an allergenic potency when tested at concentrations of 10 % and 25 %.
In vivo (LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Parameter:
- SI
- Remarks on result:
- other: see table 1 below
- Parameter:
- other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
- Remarks on result:
- other: see table 1 below
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1. Individual results
Test concentration % | Group | Measurement dpm | Calculation | Result - S.I. | ||
dpm - BG | Number of lymph nodes | dpm per lymph node | ||||
- | BG I | 4 | - | - | - | - |
- | BGII | 4 | - | - | - | - |
- | CG I | 4146 | 4142 | 8 | 518 | - |
5 | TG 2 | 7028 | 7024 | 8 | 878 | 1.7 |
10 | TG 3 | 21816 | 21812 | 8 | 2727 | 5.3 |
25 | TG 4 | 31132 | 31128 | 8 | 3891 | 7.5 |
50 | TG 5 | 36016 | 36012 | 8 | 4502 | 8.7 |
75 | TG 6 | 36335 | 36331 | 8 | 4541 | 8.8 |
BG = Background (1 mL 5% trichloroacetic acid) in duplicate
CG = Control Group
TG = Test Group
S.l. = Stimulation Index
EC3 was calculated as 6.8%
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this study the EC3 of the test substance has been calculated as 6.8% and is considered to be weakly sensitising.
- Executive summary:
The study was performed to GLP and the method followed OECD 429 to assess the skin sensitisation potential of the test material in the CBA/Jibm(SPF) strain mouse following topical application to the dorsal surface of the ear. The test item in the main study was assayed at five consecutive concentrations that were selected by the sponsor. Each test group of mice was treated by topical (epidermal) application to the dorsal surface of each ear lobe (left and right) with different test item concentrations of 5 %, 10 %, 25 %, 50% and 75% in acetone:olive oil, 4:1 (v/v). The application volume, 25 uL, was spread over the entire dorsal surface of each ear lobe once daily for three consecutive days. A further group of mice was treated with an equivalent volume of the relevant vehicle alone (control animals). Five days after the first topical application, all mice were administered with 250 uL of 83.32 uCi/ml 3HTdR (equal to 20.83 uCi 3HTdR) by intravenous injection via a tail vein. The mice were observed twice daily and any clinical signs of toxicity, if present, were also recorded. The bodyweight was recorded at the start of acclimatisation and prior to necropsy. No irritation or signs of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals examined. Body weights were within the range seen for controls over the study period. Mean DPM/animal values for the experimental groups treated with test substance concentrations 5, 10, 25, 50 and 75% were 7024, 21812, 31128, 36012 and 36331 DPM, respectively. The mean DPM/animal value for the vehicle control group was 4142 DPM. The SI values calculated for the substance concentrations 5, 10, 25, 50 and 75% were 1.7, 5.3, 7.5, 8.7 and 8.8, respectively. Under the conditions of this study the EC3 of the test substance has been calculated as 6.8% and is considered to be weakly sensitising.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.