Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)

Data source

Reference
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2008

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-methylresorcinol
EC Number:
210-155-8
EC Name:
2-methylresorcinol
Cas Number:
608-25-3
Molecular formula:
C7H8O2
IUPAC Name:
2-methylbenzene-1,3-diol

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
female

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
propylene glycol
Duration of treatment / exposure:
6 -20 days post coitum
Doses / concentrations
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0/40/200/400 mg/kg/day
Basis:
nominal in diet

Results and discussion

Results: P0 (first parental generation)

Effect levels (P0)

Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
400 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
female
Basis for effect level:
other: various
Remarks on result:
other: see attached study details

Results: F1 generation

Effect levels (F1)

Remarks on result:
not measured/tested

Overall reproductive toxicity

Reproductive effects observed:
not specified

Any other information on results incl. tables

The test substance was given in propylene glycol daily at dose volumes of 10 ml/kg bw

by oral gavage. The doses were selected on the basis of the results of a preliminary

study in rats. Maternal evaluations and measurements included daily clinical signs and

body weight/food intake recorded at designated intervals.

The dams were sacrificed on day 21 post-coitum by carbon dioxide asphyxiation and

subjected to necropsy. The number of alive and dead foetuses, their distribution and site in

the uterus, early and late resorption, implantation and number of corpora lutea was

determined. The weight of the foetuses, gravid uteri, uteri without foetuses, placenta and

the sex of foetuses was recorded. The foetuses examined for visceral alterations. Alternate

foetuses were examined for skeletal malformations, variations and retardation of the normal

organogenesis after appropriate staining.

Results

No maternal toxicity was observed, as mortality, clinical appearance, body weights, food

consumption, and macroscopic examination were unaffected by exposure to the test

substance.

No reproductive toxicity was observed, as no effects were noted on pregnancy outcome,

post-implantation loss, litter size, and sex distribution.

No developmental toxicity was observed, as foetal body weights, placental weights, and

external, visceral and skeletal examination did not reveal any adverse effects of the test

substance.

Based on the results in this embryotoxicity and teratogenicity study, the No Observed

Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for teratogenicity and maternal toxicity was 400 mg/kg

bw/day.

Comment

The dose levels were based on a range finding study. In this study severe clinical

effects were noted at a dose level of 1000 and 500 mg/kg bw (after observation of the

effects in the 1000 mg/kg dose group, the dose level was adjusted to 500 mg/kg bw

on the second day of administration). It is remarkable that in the present study no

maternal toxicity was observed up to a dose level of 400 mg/kg bw/day.

Applicant's summary and conclusion