Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 225-714-1 | CAS number: 5026-62-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
To evaluate skin irritating properties of the test item follwing studys were evaluated:
- in vitro skin irritation (accordig to OECD 439)
- In vitro skin corrosion (according to OECD 431)
- in vivo skin irritation in rabbit (according to Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.41)
To evaluate skin irritating properties of the test item follwing studys were evaluated:
- in vivo eye irritation (according to Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.42)
Based on the results of these studies the test item has folloing properties:
Skin irritation (OECD 439- OECD 431): irritating
Eye irritation (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.42):
corrosive
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Remarks:
- other: in vitro
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2012-02-13 to 2012-02-17
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EU Method b.46 (Skin Irritation)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, München, Germany
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- other: EpiDerm( MatTek) rganotypic reconstructed three-dimensional model of the human epidermis
- Cell source:
- other: EpiDerm( MatTek)
- Details on animal used as source of test system:
- organotypic reconstructed three-dimensional model of the human epidermis
- Justification for test system used:
- Ths test method is able to detect chemicals that cause skin irritation, i.e. produce reversible daamage to the skin and allows for hazard identification in accordance with UN GHS category 2.
- Vehicle:
- other: Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffrered Saline (DPBS)
- Details on test system:
- This test used the EpiDerm TM reconstructed human epidermis model (MatTk) which consists of human keratinocytes (NHEK) and therefore represents in vitro the target organ of the species of ntrest and closely mimics the biochemical and physiological properties of the upper parts of the human, i.e. the epidermis.
- Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- 25 mg test substance in 25 µL DPBS
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 60 ± 1 min
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- Post-treatment incubation period: 42 ± 4 h
- Number of replicates:
- The test was performed in triplicates for each treatment and control group.
- Details on study design:
- 3 replicate tissues are dosed with the test item, the negative control (DPBS) and the positive control (5% SDS), respectively. The tissues are incubated for 35 ± 1 minutes in a humidified incubator (37 ± 1 °C, 5 ± 1% CO2, 95% RH) and further 25 minutes at room temperature. Then the test item and the controls are rinsed off with DPBS and the tissues are post-incubated for 24 ± 2 h and, after medium renewal, for further 18 ± 2 h. Then the tissues are stained via MTT for 3 hours. Isopropanol extracts are measured photometrically at 550 nm.
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- Negative control / 60 min exposure / mean
- Value:
- >= 100
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- Positive control / 60 min exposure / mean
- Value:
- ca. 2.2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks:
- 5 % SDS
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- test item/ 60 min exposure/ mean
- Value:
- ca. 6.2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- The test item showed no direct MTT reducing capability and no colouring potential.
- Interpretation of results:
- irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- CLP: Skin Irrit. 2, H315
DSD: Xi, R38 - Executive summary:
In the present study the skin irritant potential of Sodium methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate was analysed. The EpiDerm TM-Standard Model (EPI-200 TM), a reconsituted three-dimensional human epidermis model, was used as a replacement of the Draize skin irritation test (OECD 404) to distinguish between UN GHS and EU CLP "Category 2" skin irritating test substances and not categorized test substances ("no category") which may be considered as non-irritant. Hereby, the test item was applied topically, cytotoxicity is expressed as the reduction of mitochondrila dehydrogenase activity measured by formazan production from MTTafter a 60 min exposure and 42 h post incubation period and compared to those of the concurrent negative controls. In this study under the given conditions the test item showed irritant effects. The relative mean tissue viability after 60 min of exposure and 42 h post incubation was < 50%. The test item is therefore classified as "irritant" in accordance with UN GHS and EU CLP "Category 2".
- Endpoint:
- skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2011-12-15 to 2011-12-16
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.40 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Transcutaneous Electrical Resistance Test (TER))
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Human Skin Model Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- (Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, München, Germany)
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- other: EpiDerm human epidermis model (MatTek) - organotypic reconstituted three-dimensional model of the human epidermis
- Amount/concentration applied:
- 25 mg test substance in 25 µL H2O
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3 and 60 min
- Number of replicates:
- The test was performed in duplicates for each test or control group and treatment period (3 and 60 min).
- Controls:
- other: Concurrent control tissues treated with the vehicle served as negative controls, positive controls were exposed to 8 N KOH.
- Details on study design:
- 2 replicate tissues per treatment period are dosed with the neat test item moistened with water, the negative control (distilled water) and the positive control (8 N KOH), respectively. After each treatment period the test item and controls are rinsed off and the tissues are stained with MTT for 3 h. Isopropanol extracts are measured photometrically at 550 nm.
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- negative cotrol / 3 min
- Value:
- 100
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- Basis: other: mean value of negative controls (distilled water). Time point: 3 min. Reversibility: other: not applicable.
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- positive control / 3 min
- Value:
- 27
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- Basis: other: mean value of positive controls (8 N KOH). Time point: 3 min.
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- test item / 3 min
- Value:
- 59
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- Basis: other: mean value of the test substance. Time point: 3 min. Reversibility: other: not applicable. (migrated information)
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- negative control / 60 min
- Value:
- 100
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- Basis: other: mean value of negative controls (distilled water). Time point: 60 min. Reversibility: other: not applicable. (migrated information)
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- Positive control/ 60 min
- Value:
- 23
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- Basis: other: mean value of positive controls (8 N KOH). Time point: 60 min. Reversibility: other: not applicable. (migrated information)
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- test item/ 60 min
- Value:
- 26
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Remarks:
- Basis: other: mean value of the test substance. Time point: 60 min. Reversibility: other: not applicable. (migrated information)
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- The test item showed no direct MTT-reducing capability and no colouring potential.
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not corrosive
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- There is regulatory acceptance in the EU that a substance can be considered corrosive (Skin Corrosive Cat.1A) based on a positive result in the human epidermis model test. Negative in vitro corrosivity responses are not conclusive with respect to non-classification or classification as irritant and shall therefore be subject to further evaluation.
- Executive summary:
In the present study the skin corrosivity potential of Sodium methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate was analysed. Since corrosive chemicals are cytotoxic after a short time exposure to the stratum corneum of the epidermis the cytotoxic effects of the test item on EpiDerm TM, a reconstituted three dimensional human epidermis model, was determined. hereby, the test item was applied topically. Cytotoxicity is expressed as the reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity measured by formazanproduction from MTTafter 3 min. and 60 min. exposure period and compared to those of the concurrent negative controls. In this study under the given conditions the test item showed no corrosive effects. The relative mean tissue viability after 3 min. treatment was >= 50% and after 60 min. treatment >= 15 %. The test item is therefore classified as non corrosive.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study with acceptable restrictions. An occlusive dressing was used and 48 h scores are missing. Not performed according to GLP. No analytical purity was given in the study report.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.41
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Lippische Versuchstierzucht, Extertal, Germany
- Weight at study initiation: average of 2.1 kg
- Housing: Animals were housed individually.
- Diet: mümmel z, ssniff, Soest, Germany, ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 7 - 14 d
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 16 - 18
- Humidity (%): 40
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: clipped or abraded
- Vehicle:
- water
- Controls:
- other: Not required, the untreated skin sites of the same animal served as control.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 500 mg test substance, moistened with water - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 h
- Observation period:
- 8 d
reading time points: 24 and 72 h - Number of animals:
- 6 males
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 6.25 cm²
- Type of wrap if used: The treated skin was covered with gauze and PVC foil, held in place with adhesive tape.
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- over all 6 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 1.44
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 3-8 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: no 48 h data are available; for calculation of mean scores, the 48 h values were assumed to be the same as those at 24 h (worst case assumption: persistence of effects seen at 24 h over 48 h)
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- over all 6 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0.72
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 3-8 d
- Remarks on result:
- other: no 48 h data are available; for calculation of mean scores, the 48 h values were assumed to be the same as those at 24 h (worst case assumption: persistence of effects seen at 24 h over 48 h)
- Interpretation of results:
- other:
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified - Executive summary:
In this study the skin irritating properties of sodium methyl4 -hydoxybenzoate was tested in an in vivo study according to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.41 (Schreiber, 1981a). An amount of 500 mg sodium methylparaben moistened with water was applied on the clipped and abraded skin of 6 New Zealand White rabbits and covered with an occlusive dressing for 24 h. The reading time points for erythema and edema formation were at 24 and 72 h after removal of the test substance. At the 24 h reading time point, erythema formation was observed in all animals (scores 1 or 2) and edema formation was observed in 3/6 animals (scores 1 or 3). After 72 h, erythema formation was observed in 5/6 animals (scores 1 or 2) and edema formation was observed in 3/6 animals (score 1). The effects were fully reversible in all animals within the 8 d observation period.
Referenceopen allclose all
Name |
Negative Control |
Positive Control |
Test Item |
||||||
Tissue |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
corrected OD550 |
2.171 |
2.167 |
2.186 |
0.052 |
0.048 |
0.044 |
0.094 |
0.172 |
0.132 |
2.111 |
2.203 |
2.114 |
0.050 |
0.046 |
0.048 |
0.099 |
0.176 |
0.134 |
|
mean corrected OD550 |
2.141 |
2.185 |
2.150 |
0.051 |
0.047 |
0.046 |
0.097 |
0.174 |
0.133 |
mean corrected OD550 |
2.159* |
0.048 |
0.134 |
||||||
mean SD OD550 |
0.038 |
0.003 |
0.035 |
||||||
tissue viability [%] |
99.2 |
101.2 |
99.6 |
2.4 |
2.2 |
2.1 |
4.5 |
8.1 |
6.2 |
SD tissue viability [%]*** |
1.1 |
0.1 |
1.8 |
||||||
CV [% viability] |
1.1 |
5.5 |
28.7 |
||||||
mean tissue viability [%] |
100.0 |
2.2** |
6.2 |
* Corrected mean OD550 of the negative control corresponds to 100% absolute tissue viability.
** mean relative tissue viability of the three positive control tissues is ≤ 20%
*** standard deviation (SD) obtained from the three concurrently tested tissues is < 18%
3 min.
Name |
Negative Control |
Test Item |
Positive Control |
|||
Tissue |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
absolute OD550 -values |
1.311 |
1.115 |
0.670 |
0.731 |
0.287 |
0.352 |
1.340 |
1.098 |
0.704 |
0.785 |
0.305 |
0.360 |
|
1.366 |
1.108 |
0.696 |
0.764 |
0.319 |
0.360 |
|
OD550(mean of 3 aliquots) |
1.339 |
1.107 |
0.690 |
0.760 |
0.303 |
0.358 |
SD |
0.028 |
0.009 |
0.018 |
0.027 |
0.016 |
0.004 |
OD550(mean of 2 replicate tissues) |
1.223* |
0.725 |
0.330 |
|||
mean relative tissue viability [%] |
100 |
59 |
27** |
|||
mean inter tissue viability difference [%]*** |
19.0 |
9.7 |
16.3 |
* mean OD550 ≥ 0.8
** mean relative tissue viability of the 3 min. positive control ≤ 30%
*** inter tissue viability difference ≤ 30%
60 min.
Name |
Negative Control |
Test Item |
Positive Control |
|||
Tissue |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
absolute OD550 -values |
1.418 |
1.232 |
0.361 |
0.327 |
0.319 |
0.282 |
1.416 |
1.224 |
0.355 |
0.330 |
0.340 |
0.279 |
|
1.441 |
1.230 |
0.361 |
0.339 |
0.339 |
0.281 |
|
OD550(mean of 3 aliquots) |
1.425 |
1.229 |
0.359 |
0.332 |
0.333 |
0.281 |
SD |
0.014 |
0.004 |
0.003 |
0.006 |
0.012 |
0.001 |
OD550(mean of 2 replicate tissues) |
1.327* |
0.345 |
0.307 |
|||
mean relative tissue viability [%] |
100 |
26 |
23 |
|||
mean inter tissue viability difference [%]*** |
14.8 |
7.7 |
17.0 |
* mean OD550 ≥ 0.8
*** inter tissue viability difference ≤ 30%
Table 1. Results of skin irritation study.
Observation time |
Rabbit no. |
||||||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
||||||||
Erythema |
Edema |
Erythema |
Edema |
Erythema |
Edema |
Erythema |
Edema |
Erythema |
Edema |
Erythema |
Edema |
||
24 h |
2 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
48 h |
No experimental data available; for calculation of mean scores, the 48 h values were assumed to be the same as those at 24 h (worst case assumption). |
||||||||||||
72 h |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
8 d |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Mean value 24 + 48 + 72 h* |
2.00 |
2.33 |
1.67 |
0 |
1.67 |
0.67 |
1.00 |
0.33 |
1.67 |
1.00 |
0.67 |
0 |
|
*No 48 h data are available: for calculation of mean scores, the 48 h values were assumed to be the same as those at 24 h (worst case assumption: persistence of effects seen at 24 h over 48 h).
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study with acceptable restrictions. Not performed according to GLP. No analytical purity.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.42
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Lippische Versuchstierzucht, Extertal, Germany
- Weight at study initiation: average of 2.1 kg
- Housing: Animals were housed individually.
- Diet: mümmel z, ssniff, Soest, Germany, ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 7 - 14 d
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 16 - 18
- Humidity (%): 40
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: Not required, the untreated eye of each animal served as control.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 100 µL (bulk volume) - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single application without washing
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 8 d
reading time points: 24, 48 and 72 h - Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6 males
- Details on study design:
- SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- out of all 6 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.89
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 d in 2 animals
- Remarks on result:
- other: fully reversible in 2 animals each within 48 h and 72 h, respectively
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- out of all 6 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.83
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 d in 3 animals
- Remarks on result:
- other: fully reversible within 48 h in 2 animals and within 8 d in 1 animal
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- out of all 6 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2.17
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 d in 3 animals
- Remarks on result:
- other: fully reversible within 8 d in 3 animals
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- out of all 6 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.33
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 8 d in 2 animals
- Remarks on result:
- other: fully reversible within 8 d in 4 animals
- Interpretation of results:
- corrosive
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- CLP: Eye dam. 1, H318
DSD: Xi, R41 - Executive summary:
he eye irritating potential of sodium methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate was investigated in a study performed by Schreiber (1981b) according to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.42. 0.1 mL of the unchanged test substance was instilled in one eye of each of 6 male New Zealand White rabbits without washing afterwards. The second eye of each animal was left untreated and served as control. The grades of ocular reaction (conjunctivae redness, conjunctivae chemosis, cornea, iris) were assessed 24, 48 and 72 h and 8 d after instillation of the test substance.
At 24 h post-application, swelling (score 1-3) and redness (score 2-3) of the conjunctivae were observed in all animals. The effects on conjunctivae persisted during the 48 and 72 h reading time point in all animals. After 8 d, the conjunctivae redness had fully reversed in 3/6 animals and the swelling of conjunctivae had fully reversed in 4/6 animals. Redness of the conjunctivae (score 1-2) was still noted in 3/6 rabbits and 2/6 rabbits still showed conjunctivae swelling (score 1). At 24 h post-application, effects on the iris (score 1) were observed in 5/6 rabbits. At the 48 h reading time point, the iris irritation (score 1) was noted in all animals. After 72 h, the effect persisted in 4/6 animals and reversed in 2/6 animals. After 8 d, the iris irritation had resolved in 3/6 animals. In all other rabbits the iris irritation still persisted. Corneal opacity (score 1-2) was noted in all rabbits after 24 h. The observation reversed in 2/6 animals within 48 h and in 2/6 other animals within 72 h. After 8 d, corneal opacity (score 1) was still noted in 2/6 animals.
Under the test conditions, the test substance was corrosive to the eyes (Category 1).
Reference
Table 1. Results of eye irritation study.
Rabbit # |
Time |
conjunctivae |
iris |
cornea |
|
redness |
swelling |
||||
1 |
24 h |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
48 h |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
72 h |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
8 d |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
|
average |
2,0 |
1,0 |
1,0 |
1,7 |
|
2 |
24 h |
2 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
48 h |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
72 h |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
8 d |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
average |
2,0 |
1,0 |
0,7 |
0,3 |
|
3 |
24 h |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
48 h |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
72 h |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
8 d |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
average |
2,0 |
1,0 |
1,0 |
0,7 |
|
4 |
24 h |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
48 h |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
72 h |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
8 d |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
average |
2,0 |
1,0 |
0,7 |
0,7 |
|
5 |
24 h |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
48 h |
2 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
72 h |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
8 d |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
average |
2,0 |
1,0 |
0,7 |
0,3 |
|
6 |
24 h |
3 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
48 h |
3 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
72 h |
3 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
8 d |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
average |
3,0 |
3,0 |
1,0 |
1,7 |
|
|
|
||||
Time |
conjunctivae |
iris |
cornea |
||
redness |
swelling |
||||
|
24 h |
2,17 |
1,33 |
0,83 |
1,17 |
48 h |
2,17 |
1,33 |
1,00 |
1,00 |
|
72 h |
2,17 |
1,33 |
0,67 |
0,50 |
|
24+48+72 |
2,17 |
1,33 |
0,83 |
0,89 |
After the 8 d-observation period, the effects on cornea and the swelling of conjunctivae were not fully reversible in 2 animals and the effects on iris and the redness of the conjunctivae were not fully reversible in 3 animals.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin irritation
Three studies are available addressing skin irritating properties of teh test item.
In an in vitro study, sodium methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate was investigated in a reconstructed human epidermis model (EpiDerm™) for skin corrosion according to OECD 431 and GLP (Lehmeier, 2012a). The tissues were exposed with 25 mg of the test substance in distilled water for 3 and 60 min.
Afterwards, the tissues were stained with MTT solution for 3 h. The estimation of tissue viability based on the reduction of MTT to a blue formazan product. A test substance has to be classified as skin corrosive if the mean tissue viability after 3 min is < 50% and after 60 min is < 15% relative to the respective mean negative control value. Tissue treatment with the test substance for 3 or 60 min resulted in mean tissue viabilities of 59% and 26%, respectively. The positive control substance (8 N KOH) led to tissue viabilities of 27% and 23% after 3 and 60 min incubation time, respectively.
Under the test conditions, the test substance was not considered to be skin corrosive.
In a second in vitro study, sodium methylparaben was investigated in a reconstructed human epidermis model (EpiDerm™) for skin irritation according to OECD 439 and GLP (Lehmeier, 2012b). The tissues were exposed with 25 mg of the test substance in phosphate buffered saline for 60 min. After a post-treatment period of 42 h, the tissues were stained with MTT solution for 3 h. The estimation of tissue viability based on the reduction of MTT to a blue formazan product.
A test substance has to be classified as skin irritant if the mean tissue viability is ≤ 50% relative to the mean negative control value. Tissue treatment with sodium methylparaben led to a mean tissue viability of 6.2% relative to the mean negative control value. The positive control substance (5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)) caused a mean tissue viability of 2.2% relative to the mean negative control value.
Under the test conditions, the test substance was irritating to the skin (Category 2).
In the third study, the skin irritating properties of sodium methylparaben were tested in an in vivo study according to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.41 (Schreiber, 1981a). An amount of 500 mg sodium methylparaben moistened with water was applied on the clipped and abraded skin of 6 New Zealand White rabbits and covered with an occlusive dressing for 24 h. The reading time points for erythema and edema formation were at 24 and 72 h after removal of the test substance. At the 24 h reading time point, erythema formation was observed in all animals (scores 1 or 2) and edema formation was observed in 3/6 animals (scores 1 or 3). After 72 h, erythema formation was observed in 5/6 animals (scores 1 or 2) and edema formation was observed in 3/6 animals (score 1). The effects were fully reversible in all animals within the 8 d observation period.
In summary, the available in vitro data show that the test substance was not corrosive but irritating to the skin. The in vivo study resulted in slight erythema and edema formation which was reversible within 8 days. However, since the in vitro studies are more reliable than the in vivo study, the test substance meets the criteria for classification as skin irritant (Category 2).
Eye irritation
The eye irritating potential of sodium methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate was investigated in a study performed by Schreiber (1981b) according to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.42. 0.1 mL of the unchanged test substance was instilled in one eye of each of 6 male New Zealand White rabbits without washing afterwards. The second eye of each animal was left untreated and served as control. The grades of ocular reaction (conjunctivae redness, conjunctivae chemosis, cornea, iris) were assessed 24, 48 and 72 h and 8 d after instillation of the test substance.
At 24 h post-application, swelling (score 1-3) and redness (score 2-3) of the conjunctivae were observed in all animals. The effects on conjunctivae persisted during the 48 and 72 h reading time point in all animals. After 8 d, the conjunctivae redness had fully reversed in 3/6 animals and the swelling of conjunctivae had fully reversed in 4/6 animals. Redness of the conjunctivae (score 1-2) was still noted in 3/6 rabbits and 2/6 rabbits still showed conjunctivae swelling (score 1). At 24 h post-application, effects on the iris (score 1) were observed in 5/6 rabbits. At the 48 h reading time point, the iris irritation (score 1) was noted in all animals. After 72 h, the effect persisted in 4/6 animals and reversed in 2/6 animals. After 8 d, the iris irritation had resolved in 3/6 animals. In all other rabbits the iris irritation still persisted. Corneal opacity (score 1-2) was noted in all rabbits after 24 h. The observation reversed in 2/6 animals within 48 h and in 2/6 other animals within 72 h. After 8 d, corneal opacity (score 1) was still noted in 2/6 animals.
Under the test conditions, the test substance was corrosive to the eyes (Category 1).
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion
endpoint:
The selected study is the most reliable study based on the overall
quality assessment.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
There is only one study on sodium methylparaben available. This
study is reliable.
Effects on skin irritation/corrosion: irritating
Effects on eye irritation: corrosive
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available data on skin irritation and eye irritation of the test substance meet the criteria for classification as Skin Irritant (H315) and Irreversible effects on the eye (H318) according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008 and as Xi, R38 and R41 according to Directive 67/548/EEC.
Skin irritation (OECD 439 and OECD 431): irritating
Eye irritation (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.42):
corrosive
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
