Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 223-054-9 | CAS number: 3710-30-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
skin irritation / corrosion (similar to OECD 404): not classified
eye irritation (similar to OECD 405): not classified
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions (24 h application duration, occlusive treatment, no 48 h reading performed, only 3-day observation period)
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- (adopted in 2002)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (6 animals, occlusive treatment, 24 h treatment, no 48 h reading time point, only 3-day observation period)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- study performed prior to implementation of GLP
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: H. Fortkamp, Lengerich, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 11 - 17 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.12 - 2.62 kg (mean weight: 2.36 kg)
- Housing: individually in steel grid floor cages
- Diet: Ssniff K Alleindiaet fuer Kaninchen (Ssniff Versuchstier GmbH, Soest, Germany); ad libitum
- Water: tap water; ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 4 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 23
- Humidity (%): 40 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: shaved and abraded
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: The untreated skin of each animal served as control.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.5 mL
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours
- Observation period:
- 3 days
Reading time points: 24 and 72 h - Number of animals:
- 6 females
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 6.25 cm²
- Type of wrap if used: gauze, which was held in place by an adhesive and impervious bandage
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: Residual test substance were wiped off with tissues.
- Time after start of exposure: 24 hours
SCORING SYSTEM: Evalutation was performed 25 - 26 h (defined as 24 h) and 72 h after start of application according to the Draize Scoring System. - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24 h and 72 h
- Score:
- 1.5
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: no 48 h reading; 72 h observation period
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- out of 5 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24 and 72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: no 48 h reading; 72 h observation period
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- out of 6 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24 and 72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: no 48 h reading; 72 h observation period
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- On the intact sites, all animals showed a grading score of 1 for erythema and edema at the 24 h and 72 reading time point except one animal with a grading score of 2 for erythema at the 72 h reading time point. On the abraded sites edema scores did not differ from the scores observed on the intact sites (constantly score 1). Erythema scores on the abraded sites were 1 at the 24 h reading time point in each rat and 1 or 2 in 3/6 animals each at the 72 h reading time point. Light brownish blotches were observed in 5/6 animals at the 72 h reading time point on the intact and abraded sites.
- Interpretation of results:
- study cannot be used for classification
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Conclusions:
- Slight skin irritating effects were seen in all animals but the mean values for erythema and edema on the basis of the 24 h and 72 h reading time points were below the classification criteria. The effects were not reversible, but as the observation period was only 3 days and the conditions (24 h treatment, occlusive conditions) were more rigorous than required by the current guideline, reversibility within an adequate observation period was assumed and classification for skin irriation is not warranted.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 2012
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no pretreatment with topical anesthetics and systemic analgesics; 6 animals
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- study performed prior to implementation of GLP
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: H. Fortkamp, Lengerich, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 11 - 17 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.45 - 2.94 kg
- Housing: individually in steel grid floor cages
- Diet: Ssniff K Alleindiaet fuer Kaninchen (Ssniff Versuchstier GmbH, Soest, Germany); ad libitum
- Water: mains water; ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 23
- Humidity (%): 40 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: The untreated right eye of each animal served as control.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- undiluted
Amount applied: 0.1 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single application without washing
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 7 days
Reading time points: 1 h and 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 days after application - Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6 males
- Details on study design:
- SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system
TOOL USED TO ASSESS EYES: fluorescein (before treatment) - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- out of 6 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- out of 6 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 24 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: 1-h reading: score = 1
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- out of 4 animals (#2-#5)
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: 1-h reading: score = 1 in 2/4 animals; score = 2 in 2/4 animals
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: 1-h reading: score = 1
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- out of 6 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 24 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: 1-h reading: score = 1 in 4/6 animals; score = 2 in 2/6 animals
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- One hour after instillation of the test substance moderate chemosis (grade 2) associated with moderate reddening (grade 2) were observed in 2/6 animals. In the remaining 4 animals slight chemosis (grade 1) and slight reddening (grade 1) were noted. One day after treatment chemosis was no longer apparent in any animal and eye reaction was limited to slight reddening (grade 1) in the majority of animals. Two days after treatment only one animal showed slight reddening (grade 1) and 3 days after treatment no longer any effects were observed.
- Other effects:
- Initial pain reaction on instillation varied from practically no initial pain (a few blinks only; normal within one or two minutes) to slight initial pain (rabbit blinks and tries to open eye, but the reflexes close it).
- Interpretation of results:
- study cannot be used for classification
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Conclusions:
- Slight eye irritating effects (conjunctivae redness and swelling) were observed in all animals after instillation of the test substance. Almost all effects were reversible within 24 h and not later than 48 h. Thus, classification for eye irritation is not warranted.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin
The skin irritation potential of 1,7-octadiene has been investigated in two studies in rabbits.
A study investigating the skin irritation potential of 1,7-octadiene was performed in New Zealand White rabbits similar to OECD Guideline 404 (82-0224-DKT).
0.5 mL of the undiluted test substance was applied to the intact and abraded skin of 6 female rabbits under occlusive conditions for 24 h. The scoring of skin reactions (erythema and edema) was performed 24 and 72 h after patch removal. Slight erythema (mean scores over 24 h and 72 h: 1 in 5/6 animals and 1.5 in 1/6 animals) and slight edema (mean scores over 24 h and 72 h: 1 in all animals) were observed on the intact sites. The erythema scores for the abraded skin were higher in two animals at the 72 h reading time point (mean scores over 24 h and 72 h: 1 in 3/6 animals and 1.5 in 3/6 animals), whereas the grading for oedema was identical compared to the intact skin. However, abraded sites were not taken into account for assessment.
The effects were not reversible within the observation period of 3 days. Nevertheless, the test substance is not considered irritating because the observation period should have been extended to 14 days with occurring effects and, moreover, the conditions of the study (24 h instead of 4 h treatment duration, occlusive instead of semi-occlusive conditions) are more rigorous than required by the current guideline. Reversibility of the slight effects within an adequate observation period is assumed. Thus, 1,7-octadiene is not considered irritating to skin.
One further study investigating the skin irritation potential of 1,7-octadiene is available, in which primary skin irritation in rabbits is recorded in a 10-grade ordinal series (Smyth et al., 1962 and 1969). The evaluation of skin irritation was based on the severest reaction that developed on the clipped skin of each of 5 albino rabbits within 24 h after application of 0.01 mL of undiluted test sample or of solutions up to concentrations of 0.01% under open conditions. According to the scoring system, Grade 1 indicated no irritation and Grade 2 the least visible capillary injection from the undiluted chemical. Grade 6 indicated necrosis when undiluted and Grade 10 indicated necrosis from a 0.01% solution. In the study, a Grade 4 was determined after treatment with the undiluted test substance. However, these results were inconclusive for risk assessment, since no evaluation of skin irritation according to the Draize scoring system at 24, 48 and 72 h post-application was performed and no observation period was included to evaluate the reversibility of effects.
Eye
The eye irritation potential of 1,7-octadiene has been investigated in two in vivo studies.
In the first study, the eye irritation potential of 1,7-octadiene was determined in a study performed similar OECD Guideline 405 (82-0222-DKT). A single application of 0.1 mL of the undiluted test substance was applied in the conjunctival sac of one eye of 6 male New Zealand White rabbits. The other eye remained untreated and served as control. Examination and scoring of effects on the eyes were performed 1 h and 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 days after test substance instillation. No effects on cornea and iris were seen. Moderate chemosis (grade 2) associated with moderate reddening (grade 2) were observed in 2/6 animals one hour after test substance application. In the remaining 4 animals slight chemosis (grade 1) and slight reddening (grade 1) were noted. One day after treatment chemosis was no longer apparent in any animal and eye reaction was limited to slight reddening (grade 1) in the majority of animals. Two days after treatment only one animal showed slight reddening (grade 1) and 3 days after treatment no longer any effects were observed. The mean cornea, iris and chemosis scores over 24, 48 and 72 h were 0 for all 6 animals, respectively. The mean conjunctivae scores were 0 and 0.33 for one animal each and 0.67 for 4 animals, respectively. Thus, based on the results of this study, 1,7-octadiene is not eye irritating.
One further study investigating the eye irritation potential of 1,7-octadiene is available, in which the eye injury in rabbits was recorded in a 10-grade ordinal series and evaluation of eye injury was based on the degree of corneal necrosis that resulted from instillation of various volumes and concentrations of the test substance (Smyth et al., 1962 and 1969). At most a very small area of necrosis was observed after installation of 0.5 mL of the undiluted test substance (Grade 1). However, these results were inconclusive for risk assessment, since no evaluation of eye irritation according to the Draize scoring system at 24, 48 and 72 h post-application was performed and no observation period was included to evaluate the reversibility of effects.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
The selected study is the most adequate and reliable study based on overall quality assessment.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
The selected study is the most adequate and reliable study based on overall quality assessment.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin
The available data on skin irritation / corrosion of 1,7-octadiene do not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008, and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.
Eye
The available data on eye irritation of 1,7-octadiene do not meet the criteria for classification according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008, and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.