Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-538-4 | CAS number: 1471313-87-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The registration substance was investigated for skin and/or eye irritation potential in GLP conform assays according to OECD test guidelines 404 and 405. Based on the results of these studies, the test material is not a skin irritant. With regard to eye irritation, the registration substance does not fulfill the classification criteria according to the `Dangerous Substance Directive" (67/548/EEC, DSD) but is considered to be `mildly irritating to eyes` (category 2B) according to GHS-CLP.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1987
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Hoechst AG
- Age at study initiation: 3 - 5 month
- Weight at study initiation:
- Housing:individually
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: approximately 3 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 3°C
- Humidity (%): 50 +/-20 %
- Air changes (per hr): 12
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): o.5 mL per patch
- Concentration (if solution): undiluted - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hour exposure
- Number of animals:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 x 2.5 cm
- % coverage: 100
- Type of wrap if used: semi-occlusive
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): yes
- Time after start of exposure: after 4 hour exposure period
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- all animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.2
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Remarks:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Remarks:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Remarks:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- all animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Based on the results of this study, the test material is not irritating to rabbit skin.
- Executive summary:
The primary skin irritation potential of the registration substance was evaluated according to OECD test guideline 404 using three New Zealand albino rabbits. Only animals with intact skin were used. Each animal was treated with 0.5 mL of undiluted test material moistered with NaCl.The test item was applied over the whole surface of a 2.5 x2.5 cm cellulose patch on a piece of surgical plaster. The plaster was fixed to the prepared skin area and then covered with a semi-occlusive bandage. The exposure period was 4 hours. After the exposure all remnants of the test material were carefully removed from the skin with warm tap water. Examinations of the skin took place after 30-60 minutes as well as 24, 48 and 72 hours after removal of the patches. Erythema and edema were evaluated numerically according to the score of DRAIZE. Slight erythemas were observed in two animals up to 24 hours after removal of the plaster. Form the 48 h reading until the end of the study no signs of irritation were observed in any of the animals. The overall mean scores over all animals after 24, 48 and 72 hours were 0.2 for erythema and 0.0 for edema. Based on the study results,no relevant skin irritating potential is attributable to the registration substance in rabbits under the described test conditions.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2008-06-04 till 2008-06-23
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Netherlands BV
- Age at study initiation: 15 weeks (male), 15-16 weeks (females)
- Weight at study initiation: 2628 g (male), 2480 and 2803 (females)
- Housing: Individually in stainless steel cages equipped with feed hoppers and drinking water bowls.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Pelleted standard Provimi Kliba 3418 rabbit maintenance diet ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Community tap water from Füllinsdorf ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 04-JUN-2008 to 08-JUN-2008 (one female), 04-JUN-2008 to 15-JUN -2008 (one male and one female)
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17-23 °C
- Humidity (%): 30-70 %
- Air changes (per hr): 10 - 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours/ 12 hours - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: control area on same animal (right eye)
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 g per animal - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 72 hrs
- Observation period (in vivo):
- up 7 days in the male and one female and up to 14 days in the first treated female after test item instillation.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 (1 male, 2 females)
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): no
SCORING SYSTEM:
numerical scoring system listed in the Commission Directive 2004/73/EC, April 29, 2004.
Scleral reddening and ocular discharge were also assessed.
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: Varta Cliptrix diagnostic-lamp (Roth AG, CH-4153 Reinach/Switzerland). - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0 - 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.67 - 2
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Based upon the referred classification (Commission Directive 2001/59/EC of August 06, 2001), Hostapon TPHC is considered to be “not irritating” to the rabbit eye.
- Executive summary:
The primary eye irritation potential of the registration substance was evaluated in the New Zealand albino rabbit according to OECD test guideline 405. Only animals without ocular abnormalities were used for the study. o.1 mL of undiluted test material was applied once to the conjunctival sac of the left eye of three rabbits. The untreated eyes served in each case as a control. The exposure period was 24 hours. 24 hours after instillation and at all the designated examination times at which a corneal examination with fluorescein sodium solution took place, the treated eyes were washed out thoroughly with isotonic saline at approx. 37°C. The eyes were examined 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours as well as 7, 10 and 14 days after application of the test substance. At 24 and 72 hours the eyes were also examined for corneal lesions under UV light after instillation of one drop of 0.01% fluorescein-sodium solution. The instillation of the test material into the eye resulted in mild to moderate, early-onset and transient ocular changes, such as corneal opacity, reddening of the conjunctivae and sclerae, discharge and chemosis. These effects were reversible and were no longer evident 7 days after treatment. The individual mean scores for corneal opacity was 0.67 for all three animals. The individual mean scores for the conjunctivae were 2.00 for reddening and 0.67, 0.33 and 0.67 for chemosis for each of the three animals. No abnormal findings were observed in the iris of any animal at any of the examinations. No corrosion was observed at any of the measuring intervals. White test item remnants were evident in the eye or conjunctival sac of one female 1 hour after instillation. No staining of the treated eyes by the test item was observed and no clinical signs were observed. Based on the findings and in accordance with the classification criteria of Directive 67/548 EEC (DSD), the registration substance is considered to be "not irritating" to the rabbit eye. However, based on the criteria of Directive (EC) 1272/2008 (GHS-CLP) the registration substance should be considered to be "mildly irritating to eyes" (category 2B).
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
GLP conform guideline studies are available for the evaluation of the endpoints skin irritation / corrosion and eye irritation with the pure registered substance. With regard to skin irritation/corrosion, three New Zealand albino rabbits were exposed to 0.5 mL of undiluted test material for 4 hours under semi-occlusive test conditions in accordance with OECD guideline 404. Skin reactions were assessed 30 -60 minutes, 24, 48 and 72 hours after removal of the patches. As a result, slight erythemas were observed in two animals up to 24 hours after removal of the plaster. From the 48 h reading until the end of the study no signs of irritation were observed in any of the animals. The overall mean scores over all animals after 24, 48 and 72 hours were 0.2 for erythema and 0.0 for edema. Based on the study results,no relevant skin irritating potential is attributable to the registration substance in rabbits under the described test conditions.
The primary eye irritation potential of the registration substance was evaluated in the New Zealand albino rabbit according to OECD test guideline 405. Only animals without ocular abnormalities were used for the study. o.1 mL of undiluted test material was applied once to the conjunctival sac of the left eye of three rabbits. The untreated eyes served in each case as a control. The exposure period was 24 hours. 24 hours after instillation and at all the designated examination times at which a corneal examination with fluorescein sodium solution took place, the treated eyes were washed out thoroughly with isotonic saline at approx. 37°C. The eyes were examined 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours as well as 7, 10 and 14 days after application of the test substance. At 24 and 72 hours the eyes were also examined for corneal lesions under UV light after instillation of one drop of 0.01% fluorescein-sodium solution.The instillation of the test material into the eye resulted in mild to moderate, early-onset and transient ocular changes, such as corneal opacity, reddening of the conjunctivae and sclerae, discharge and chemosis. These effects were reversible and were no longer evident 7 days after treatment.
Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
Guideline study according to GLP. No derivations and/or confounders. Klimisch rating 1 representing reliability without restrictions. Information is valid and meet data requirements.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Guideline study according to GLP. No derivations and/or confounders. Klimisch rating 1 representing reliability without restrictions. Information is valid and meet data requirements.
Effects on eye irritation: slightly irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
In a guideline and GLP compliant primary skin irritation/corrosion study according to OECD TG 404, the registered substance produced only slight to moderate skin responses. Based on the individual mean scores for erythema and oedema no classification of the registered substance with regard to skin irritation/corrosion is warranted, either according to the EU Dangerous Substances Directive 67/548 (DSD) or according to the criteria of the EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation 1272/2008/EC (CLP).
With regard to primary eye irritation, a guideline and GLP conform study according to OECD TG 405 revealed individual mean scores for the conjunctivae of 2.00 for reddening and 0.67, 0.33 and 0.67 for chemosis for each of the three animals. No abnormal findings were observed in the iris of any animal at any of the examinations. No corrosion was observed at any of the measuring intervals. No staining of the treated eyes by the test item was observed and no clinical signs were observed. Based on the findings and in accordance with the classification criteria of Directive 67/548 EEC (DSD), the registration substance is considered to be "not irritating" to the rabbit eye. However, based on the criteria of Directive (EC) 1272/2008 (GHS-CLP) the registration substance should be considered to be "mildly irritating to eyes" (category 2).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.