Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 446-630-3 | CAS number: 181587-01-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 23 Jul - 20 Oct 1998
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 999
- Report date:
- 1999
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Version / remarks:
- Jul 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5395 (In Vivo Mammalian Cytogenetics Tests: Erythrocyte Micronucleus Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: UKEMS Guidelines (1990)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ICH Tripartite Harmonised Guideline on Genotoxicity: Specific Aspects of Regulatory Tests (1995)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 446-630-3
- EC Name:
- -
- Cas Number:
- 181587-01-9
- Molecular formula:
- C13H9Cl2F3N4OS
- IUPAC Name:
- 5-amino-1-[2,6-dichloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4-(ethanesulfinyl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carbonitrile
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CD-1
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River UK Ltd, Margate, UK
- Age at study initiation: 35 days
- Weight at study initiation: 25-32 g (males), 21-27 (females)
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes, under following basis: male and female mice were randomised to groups of five using a system of randomly generated numbers.
- Housing: animals were housed in groups of no more than four animals of the same sex in appropriate caging.
- Diet: diet (Special Diets Services Ltd, RM1.[E].SQC.), ad libitum
- Water: mains water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-24
- Humidity (%): 45-65
- Air changes (per hr): at least 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: 0.5% methyl cellulose
- Concentration of test material in vehicle: 25, 50 and 100 mg/mL for dose levels of 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw/day, respectively
- Amount of vehicle: 20 mL/kg bw - Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: dosing preparations were made by suspending the test substance (with homogenisation) in 0.5% methyl cellulose (0.5% MC) to give the top concentrations of 25, 50 and 100 mg/mL for dose levels of 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw/day, respectively, and dilutions were made using 0.5% MC. The test article preparations were protected from light, maintained as an even suspension (by multiple inversion) and used within 6.5 h of initial formulation (following analysis of achieved concentration).
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- not applicable
- Frequency of treatment:
- Range-finding study and main study: single administration
- Post exposure period:
- Range-finding study: 4 days after treatment
Main study: 24, 48 and 72 h after treatment with the test substance; 24 h after treatment with the positive control CPA
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Range-finding study: 3
Main study: 5 - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- Cyclophosphamide
- Route of administration: oral gavage
- Doses / concentrations: 40 mg/kg bw (2 mg/mL in saline)
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Tissue: bone marrow
Cell type: bone marrow cells - Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: a range finding study was performed to find the maximum tolerated dose. The test article in 0.5% CM was administered as a single dose to groups of three male and three female mice at 2000 mg/kg/day via oral gavage. Observations were made over a 4-day period following administration and signs of toxicity and body weight recorded. These data were used to obtain a maximum acceptable dose (2000 mg/kg/day) which was used as the top dose in the main study.
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields): sampling was performed 24, 48 and 72 h after single administration of the test substance and 24 h after single administration of the positive control CPA.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: slides were fixed with methanol and then stained with filtered Giemsa solution (1:6 (v/v) diluted in distilled water) for 10 min.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: slides were microscopically analysed and relative proportions of polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) and normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE) were determined until a total of at least 1000 cells (PCE plus NCE) had been analysed. PCE/NCE ratios were examined to see if there was any decrease in groups of treated animals that could be taken as evidence of bone marrow toxicity. Counting continued (but of PCE only) until at least 2000 PCE had been observed. All PCE containing micronuclei observed during these two phases of counting were recorded. The vernier coordinates of all cells containing micronuclei were recorded to a maximum of six per 2000 cells scored. - Evaluation criteria:
- The test article was to be considered as positive in this assay if:
1) a statistically significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated PCE occurred at least at one dose, at one sampling time, was observed and
2) the frequency of micronucleated PCE at such a point exceeded the historical vehicle control range.
If statistically insignificant increases in frequencies of micronucleated PCE at one dose, at one sampling time in conjunction with either 1 or 2 of the above at the other sampling time were observed, additional testing or analysis was needed. - Statistics:
- The ratio of PCE/NCE for each animal and the mean for each group was calculated and the frequency of micronucleated PCE/1000 PCE was determined. The individual and group mean frequencies of micronucleated PCE/1000 cells (± standard deviation) were also determined. The group mean frequencies of micronucleated PCE in vehicle control animals were compared with historical negative control ranges to determine whether or not the assay was acceptable. For each group, interindividual variation in the numbers of micronucleated PCE was estimated by means of a heterogeneity χ2 test. The numbers of micronucleated PCE in each treated group (males and females, separately and combined) were then compared with the numbers in vehicle control groups by using a 2 x 2 contingency table to determine χ2. Probability values of p < 0.05 were to be accepted as significant. A further statistical test (for linear trend) was used to evaluate possible dose-response relationships.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 1000 mg/kg bw/day: mortalities were observed in 1/5 females 24 h after treatment and in 1/5 males 48 h after treatment; 2000 mg/kg bw/day: mortalities were observed in 1/5 females 24 h after treatment and in 2/5 females 48 h after treatment
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Dose range: based on the results of the range finding study, dose levels of 500, 1000 and 2000 mg/kg bw were selected for the main study.
- Solubility: the test substance was well soluble in 0.5% CM.
- Clinical signs of toxicity in test animals: abnormal gait was exhibited by both sexes between 2 and 4 hours after administration. No other clinical signs or loss of body weight were observed.
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
- Induction of micronuclei: the test substance did not induce an increase in the frequency of micronuclei in the polychromatic erythrocytes of the bone marrow of mice treated up to 2000 mg/kg bw. Group mean frequencies of micronucleated PCE were similar to those seen in vehicle control groups and were not significantly different after statistical analysis. All micronuclei frequencies fell within the historical vehicle control range.
- Ratio of PCE/NCE: groups of mice treated with the test substance exhibited PCE/NCE ratios which were similar to those treated with the vehicle at all sampling times.
- Appropriateness of dose levels and route: dose levels and route of exposure were appropriate, since at least eight animals (males plus females) out of each group at each kill time were available for analysis. Thus, the acceptance criteria for the micronucleus assay were fulfilled (see “Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables”).
- Statistical evaluation: the numbers of micronucleated PCE in each treated group (males and females, separately and combined) were then compared with the numbers in vehicle control groups by using a 2 x 2 contingency table to determine χ2. Probability values of p < 0.05 were to be accepted as significant. A further statistical test (for linear trend) was used to evaluate possible dose-response relationships. No statistically significant differences were observed in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes between treated and control animals.
Any other information on results incl. tables
VALIDITY OF THE STUDY
The acceptance criteria outlined under “Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables” were fulfilled, as shown by the following results:
1) in most cases, the heterogeneity χ2 test provided evidence of acceptable variability in the number of micronucleated PCE between animals within each group. Heterogeneity of marginal significance (p ≤ 0.05) was seen among animals treated with the vehicle and sampled at 48 hours and was attributable to one mouse with 4 micronucleated PCE/2000 cells. Insofar as such a frequency fell within the historical vehicle control range and has previously been seen among control animals, and other animals in the group had low frequencies of cells with micronuclei, it was considered to be of no biological significance.
2) The incidence of micronucleated PCE in vehicle control groups fell within the historical vehicle control range.
3) At least eight animals (males plus females) out of each group at each kill time were available for analysis.
4) The positive control chemical (CPA) induced a statistically significant increase in the frequency of micronucleated PCE.
RESULTS OF THE MAIN ASSAY
Table 1. Results of the in vivo micronucleus assay in male animals
Male treatment group |
Mean ratio PCEs / NCEs |
Mean frequency of micronucleated PCEs (per 1000 cells) at sampling time |
|||||||
Group |
Number of animals |
Dose [mL/kg] |
24 h |
48 h |
72 h |
24 h |
48 h |
72 h |
|
Vehicle control (0.5% methyl cellulose) |
5 |
20 |
1.21 |
0.79 |
1.16 |
0.30 |
0.00 |
0.25 |
|
Positive control (CPA) |
5 |
20 |
0.98 |
n.d. |
n.d. |
12.50 |
n.d. |
n.d. |
|
500 mg/kg bw |
5 |
20 |
0.96 |
0.65 |
0.96 |
0.69 |
0.30 |
0.20 |
|
1000 mg/kg bw |
5 |
20 |
1.15 |
0.61 |
0.80 |
0.30 |
0.25 |
0.30 |
|
2000 mg/kg bw |
5 |
20 |
1.38 |
0.71 |
0.97 |
0.10 |
0.20 |
0.10 |
n.d. = not determined; CPA = cyclophosphamide
Table 2. Results of the in vivo micronucleus assay in female animals.
Female treatment group |
Mean ratio PCEs / NCEs |
Mean frequency of micronucleated PCEs (per 1000 cells) at sampling time |
|||||||
Group |
Number of animals |
Dose [mL/kg] |
24 h |
48 h |
72 h |
24 h |
48 h |
72 h |
|
Vehicle control (0.5% methyl cellulose) |
5 |
20 |
0.99 |
0.81 |
0.89 |
0.70 |
0.79 |
0.50 |
|
Positive control (CPA) |
5 |
20 |
0.80 |
n.d. |
n.d. |
12.18 |
n.d. |
n.d. |
|
500 mg/kg bw |
5 |
20 |
1.14 |
0.98 |
0.90 |
0.60 |
0.70 |
0.10 |
|
1000 mg/kg bw |
5 |
20 |
1.14 |
0.80 |
1.04 |
0.12 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
|
2000 mg/kg bw |
5 |
20 |
0.98 |
0.76 |
0.82 |
0.25 |
0.12 |
0.25 |
n.d. = not determined; CPA = cyclophosphamide
Table 3. Results of the in vivo micronucleus assay (per treatment group)
Treatment group |
Dose [mg(kg bw] |
Sampling time [h] |
Mean frequency of PCE with MN (per 1000 cells) (± SD) |
PCE/NCE ratio |
|
Vehicle control |
0 |
24 |
0.50 ± 0.6 |
1.10 |
|
48 |
0.44 ± 0.7 |
0.80 |
|||
72 |
0.39 ± 0.3 |
1.03 |
|||
Test substance |
500 |
24 |
0.64 ± 0.6 |
1.05 |
|
48 |
0.50 ± 0.5 |
0.82 |
|||
72 |
0.15 ± 0.2 |
0.93 |
|||
Test substance |
1000 |
24 |
0.22 ± 0.4 |
1.15 |
|
48 |
0.22 ± 0.3 |
0.71 |
|||
72 |
0.25 ± 0.4 |
0.92 |
|||
Test substance |
2000 |
24 |
0.17 ± 0.3 |
1.18 |
|
48 |
0.17 ± 0.3 |
0.74 |
|||
72 |
0.17 ± 0.4 |
0.90 |
|||
Positive control (CPA) |
40 |
24 |
12.34 ± 3.7* |
0.89 |
CPA = cyclophosphamid; MN = Micronuclei; *p ≤ 0.001
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions chosen, the test substance was not cytogenic in mice.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.