Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 226-107-4 | CAS number: 5280-80-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Not irritating on rabbit skin (OECD 404)
Not irritating in rabbit eyes (OECD 405, OECD 437, OECD 492)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin:
Reliable data from two studies on skin irritation are available for the test substance. These data reveal a very low skin irritation potential for the 'yellow disazo condensation pigment'.
In a primary dermal OECD guideline irritation study (OECD 404, Ciba-Geigy Ltd., 1983), 3 female New Zealand White rabbits were dermally exposed to 0.5 g of the test substance (CAS 5280-80-8) for 4 hours under semiocclusive conditions. Animals then were observed for 7 days. Irritation was scored by the method of Draize as described in the OECD guideline 404. The mean score for the 24, 48 and 72 h reading for erythema was 0.44 and for edema was 0. The skin reactions observed were fully reversible within 48 hours. Under the conditions of the present experiment the test substance was found to be non-irritant and not corrosive when applied to the rabbit skin (BASF, 1983).
In a supporting study 3 male and 3 female New Zealand White rabbits were dermally exposed to 0.5 g of the test substance for 24 h under occlusive conditions. After 24 and 72 hours the application sites were assessed for oedema and erythema. Under the conditions of this test, the pigment was also not considered to be irritating to the rabbit skin (Ciba-Geigy Ltd., 1975).
Eye:
Reliable data from two in vitro and two in vivo studies on eye irritation are available for the test substance.
For the test substance a Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test (BCOP Test) according to OECD guideline 437 were conducted (BASF, 2015). Three corneas were treated with the undiluted test substance (bulk volume of about 45 mg) for an exposure period of 4 hours. Based on the observed results (IVIS score = 0.0) it was concluded, that the test substance does not cause ocular corrosion or severe irritation in the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test (BCOP Test). However, the Guideline also states, that due to limited accuracy of the BCOP test to correctly identify substances that do not require classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage, this test method should not be the first choice to initiate a bottom-up approach. Thus, the substance was also examined in an EpiOcular to exclude an eye irritation potential.
The conducted EpiOcular™ Eye irritation study with the test substance was performed according to OECD guideline 492 (BASF, 2015). The tissue was treated with 50 µL bulk volume (about 9 g) of the test substance for 6 hours followed by a 18-hours post-incubation period. The determined mean relative tissue viability compared to the negative control is 91.2 %. Since the mean tissue viability was >60 % of the negative control, the test substance does not show any eye irritation potential in the EpiOcular™ eye irritation test.
Further, two in vivo eye irritation test with New Zealand White rabbits according to OECD 405 are available. In one test (Ciba-Geigy Ltd., 1983) the eyes were left unwashed after application of 0.1 g of test substance and the animals were observed 7 days. The mean scores for the 24, 48 and 72 h reading for conjunctivae redness, iritis, cornea opacity and conjunctivae chemosis were 0.1, 0, 0.1, and 0, respectively. After 48 hours all reactions were reversed. In the other test (Ciba-Geigy Ltd., 1975) three animals eyes were left unwashed and three animals the eyes were washed out after 30 seconds after application of 0.1 g of test substance and the animals were observed 72 hours. The mean scores for the 24, 48 and 72 h reading for conjunctivae redness, iritis, cornea opacity and conjunctivae chemosis were 0 at any reading time point. Conjunctival redness was only observed after 1 hour after application.
Based on the results of the in vitro and in vivo tests with the test substance it is concluded that the pigment is not irritating to the eye.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008. Based on available data on skin irritation/corrosion and eye irritation, the test item is not classified according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP), as amended for the tenth time in Regulation (EU) No 2017/776.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

Route: .live1