Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 916-736-9 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2014-2015
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted according to OECD and GLP guidelines, and was considered to be relevant, adequate and reliable.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 015
- Report date:
- 2015
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: The Ocular Toxicity Working Group (OTWG) of the ICCVAM and the(NICEATM),Background Review Document (BRD): current status of in vitro test methods for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants: The BCOP Test Method, March 2006.
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: In Vitro Techniques in Toxicology Database (INVITTOX) protocol 127. Bovine Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) Assay, 2006.
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Gautheron P., Dukic M., Alix D. and Sina J.F., Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test: An in vitro assay of ocular irritancy. Fundam Appl Toxicol 18:442-449, 1992.
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Reaction mass of (1,1’ oxybis(ethylbenzene) and styrene, oligomers
- IUPAC Name:
- Reaction mass of (1,1’ oxybis(ethylbenzene) and styrene, oligomers
- Reference substance name:
- SMPO Heavy Ends
- IUPAC Name:
- SMPO Heavy Ends
- Test material form:
- liquid: viscous
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): SMPO Heavy Ends; Reaction mass of (1,1’ oxybis(ethylbenzene) and styrene, oligomers
- Substance type: UVCB
- Physical state: Brown liquid
- Analytical purity: 100%
- Purity test date: No data
- Lot/batch No.: BC604 17-10-2014
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: No data
- Stability under test conditions: Not indicated
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature protected from light
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- other: in vitro
Test system
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 750 µL undiluted
Results and discussion
In vivo
Results
- Irritation parameter:
- other: mean IVIS (in vitro irritancy score)
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 10 minutes
- Score:
- 17.9
- Remarks on result:
- other: 17.9 >3; = 55: no prediction on the classification can be made.
Any other information on results incl. tables
SMPO Heavy Ends was tested neat.
Table 1 summarizes the opacity, permeability and in vitro irritancy scores of SMPO Heavy Ends and the controls. The opacity, permeability and in vitro scores of the individual corneas are shown in Table 2-5.
The individual in vitro irritancy scores for the negative controls ranged from -3.0 to 1.0. The individual positive control in vitro irritancy scores ranged from 131 to 153 for Benzalkonium Chloride. The corneas treated with the positive control substance were turbid after the 10 minutes of treatment.
The corneas treated with SMPO Heavy Ends showed opacity values ranging from 14 to 17 and permeability values ranging from 0.018 to 0.465. The corneas were turbid after the 10 minutes of treatment with SMPO Heavy Ends. No pH effect of the test substance was observed on the rinsing medium, however the test substance was difficult to remove. Hence, the in vitro irritancy scores ranged from 15.5 to 21.0 after 10 minutes of treatment with SMPO Heavy Ends.
The negative control responses for opacity and permeability were less than the upper limits of the laboratory historical range indicating that the negative control did not induce irritancy on the corneas.
The mean in vitro irritancy score of the positive control (10% (w/v) Benzalkonium Chloride) was 144 and was within the historical positive control data range. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the test system functioned properly.
SMPO Heavy Ends induced ocular irritation through both endpoints, resulting in a mean in vitro irritancy score of 17.9 after 10 minutes of treatment.
Since SMPO Heavy Ends induced an IVIS > 3 = 55, no prediction on the classification can be made.
Table 1. Summary of opacity, permeability andin vitroscores
Treatment |
Mean Opacity1 |
Mean Permeability1 |
Mean In vitro Irritation Score1, 2 |
Negative control |
-1 |
0.000 |
-0.7 |
Positive control (Benzalkonium Chloride) |
91 |
3.571 |
144.2 |
SMPO Heavy Ends |
15 |
0.172 |
17.9 |
1Calculated using the negative control mean opacity and mean permeability values.
2In vitro irritancy score (IVIS) = mean opacity value + (15 x mean OD490 value).
Table 2. Opacity score
Eye |
Opacity before treatment |
Opacity after treatment |
Final Opacity1 |
Negative control corrected Final Opacity2 |
Mean Opacity |
Negative control |
|||||
1 |
3 |
0 |
-3 |
-3 |
-1 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
3 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
-1 |
|
|
Mean final opacity: -1 |
|
|||
Positive control |
|||||
4 |
1 |
86 |
85 |
85 |
91 |
5 |
1 |
106 |
105 |
105 |
|
6 |
1 |
83 |
82 |
82 |
|
SMPO Heavy Ends |
|||||
16 |
0 |
14 |
14 |
14 |
15 |
17 |
2 |
17 |
15 |
15 |
|
18 |
0 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
1Final Opacity = Opacity after treatment – Opacity before treatment.
2Negative control corrected Final Opacity = Final opacity – Mean final opacity negative control.
Table 3. Permeability score individual values (uncorrected)
Eye |
Dilution factor |
OD490 1 |
OD490 2 |
OD490 3 |
Average OD |
Final OD1 |
Mean final negative control |
Negative control |
|||||||
1 |
1 |
0.006 |
0.012 |
0.004 |
0.007 |
0.007 |
0.007 |
2 |
1 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.006 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
|
3 |
1 |
0.009 |
0.008 |
0.009 |
0.009 |
0.009 |
|
Positive control (Benzalkonium Chloride) |
|
||||||
4 |
6 |
0.520 |
0.522 |
0.524 |
0.522 |
3.132 |
|
5 |
6 |
0.525 |
0.468 |
0.470 |
0.488 |
2.926 |
|
6 |
6 |
0.795 |
0.790 |
0.806 |
0.797 |
4.782 |
|
SMPO Heavy Ends |
|
||||||
16 |
1 |
0.477 |
0.464 |
0.474 |
0.472 |
0.472 |
|
17 |
1 |
0.039 |
0.041 |
0.040 |
0.040 |
0.040 |
|
18 |
1 |
0.025 |
0.025 |
0.025 |
0.025 |
0.025 |
|
1Final OD = Average OD x Dilution factor.
Table 4. Permeability score individual values (corrected)
Eye |
Dilution factor |
Negative control corrected OD490 11 |
Negative control corrected OD490 21 |
Negative control corrected OD490 31 |
Negative control corrected OD490 Average |
Negative control corrected final OD490 |
Average OD |
Negative control |
|||||||
1 |
1 |
-0.001 |
0.005 |
-0.03 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
0.000 |
2 |
1 |
-0.002 |
-0.002 |
-0.01 |
-0.002 |
-0.002 |
|
3 |
1 |
0.002 |
0.001 |
0.002 |
0.002 |
0.002 |
|
Positive control (Benzalkonium Chloride) |
|||||||
4 |
6 |
0.513 |
0.515 |
0.517 |
0.515 |
3.089 |
3.571
|
5 |
6 |
0.518 |
0.461 |
0.463 |
0.481 |
2.883 |
|
6 |
6 |
0.788 |
0.783 |
0.799 |
0.790 |
4.739 |
|
SMPO Heavy Ends |
|||||||
16 |
1 |
0.470 |
0.457 |
0.467 |
0.465 |
0.465 |
0.172 |
17 |
1 |
0.032 |
0.034 |
0.033 |
0.033 |
0.033 |
|
18 |
1 |
0.018 |
0.018 |
0.018 |
0.018 |
0.018 |
1OD490 values corrected for the mean final negative control permeability (0.007).
Table 5.In vitroirritancy score
Eye |
Negative control corrected Final Opacity |
Negative control corrected Final OD490 |
In vitroIrritancy Score1 |
Negative control |
|||
1 |
-3 |
0.000 |
-3.0 |
2 |
0 |
-0.002 |
0.0 |
3 |
1 |
0.002 |
1.0 |
Positive control (Benzalkonium Chloride) |
|||
4 |
85 |
3.089 |
131.3 |
5 |
105 |
2.883 |
148.3 |
6 |
82 |
4.739 |
153.1 |
SMPO Heavy Ends |
|||
16 |
14 |
0.465 |
21.0 |
17 |
15 |
0.033 |
15.5 |
18 |
17 |
0.018 |
17.3 |
1In vitro irritancy score (IVIS) = opacity value + (15 x OD490 value).
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other: no prediction on the classification can be made
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: OECD GHS
- Conclusions:
- Since SMPO Heavy Ends induced an IVIS > 3 = 55, no prediction on the classification can be made in this BCOP test .
- Executive summary:
Screening for the eye irritancy potential of SMPO Heavy Ends using the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability test (BCOP test).The substance was tested through topical application for 10 ± 1 minutes. Batch BC604 14-10-2014 of SMPO Heavy Ends was a brown liquid with a purity of 100%. The test substance was applied as it is (750 µL) directly on top of the corneas.
The negative control responses for opacity and permeability were less than the upper limits of the laboratory historical range indicating that the negative control did not induce irritancy on the corneas. The mean in vitro irritancy score of the positive control (10% w/v) Benzalkonium Chloride) was 144 and was within the historical positive control data range. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the test system functioned properly.
SMPO Heavy Ends induced ocular irritation throughout both endpoints, resulting in a mean in vitro irritancy score of 17.9 after 10 minutes of treatment. Since SMPO Heavy Ends induced an IVIS > 3 = 55, no prediction on the classification can be made.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
