Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
distribution modelling
Type of information:
calculation (if not (Q)SAR)
Remarks:
Migrated phrase: estimated by calculation
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Non GLP, non guideline, QSAR calculation, acceptable with restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other company data
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2010

Materials and methods

Model:
calculation according to Mackay, Level III
Calculation programme:
PETRORISK Model
Media:
air - biota - sediment(s) - soil - water

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Vacuum gas oils/hydrocracked gas oils/distillate fuels
IUPAC Name:
Vacuum gas oils/hydrocracked gas oils/distillate fuels

Results and discussion

Percent distribution in media

Air (%):
24.36
Water (%):
0.14
Soil (%):
62.86
Sediment (%):
12.64
Susp. sediment (%):
0.1
Biota (%):
0.1
Aerosol (%):
0.1

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The distribution of the substance in the environmental compartments, air, water, soil, and sediment, has been calculated using the PETRORISK Model.Based on the regional scale exposure assessment, the multimedia distribution of the substance is 24.36 % to air, 0.14 % to water, 62.86 % to sediment and 12.64 % to soil. Distribution modelling results are included in the ‘Multimedia distribution modelling results’ tab in the PETRORISK spreadsheet attached to IUCLID Section 13 of the CSR (Redman et al., 2010a).
Executive summary:

The distribution of the substance in the environmental compartments, air, water, soil, and sediment, has been calculated using the PETRORISK Model.Based on the regional scale exposure assessment, the multimedia distribution of the substance is 24.36 % to air, 0.14 % to water, 62.86 % to sediment and 12.64 % to soil. Distribution modelling results are included in the ‘Multimedia distribution modelling results’ tab in the PETRORISK spreadsheet attached to IUCLID Section 13 of the CSR (Redman et al., 2010a). This study is considered reliable (2) as it is a Non GLP, non guideline, QSAR calculation which is acceptable with restrictions.

Categories Display