Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-347-4 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Between 29 July 2009 and 25 September 2009
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted to GLP and in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do no effect the quality of the relevant results.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 009
- Report date:
- 2009
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Date of GLP inspection: 19 August 2009 Date of Signature on GLP certificate: 04 March 2009
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- E0286P/040A
- IUPAC Name:
- E0286P/040A
- Details on test material:
- Sponsor's identification: E0286P/040A
Description : Amber coloured viscous liquid
Chemical name: A complex mixture of titanium salts
Purity : 80%
Batch number : E0286P/040A
Date received : 20 July 2009
Storage conditions: Room temperature in the dark
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Histidine for Salmonella.
Tryptophan for E.Coli
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable.
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable.
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbitone/betanaphthoflavone induced rat liver, S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary Toxicity Test: 0, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
main test:
Experiment one: 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
Experiment two: Salmonella strains TA100 & TA1537 and E.coli strain WP2uvrA- (with and without S9): 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate.
Salmonella strain TA1535 (without S9): 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 5000 µg/plate.
Salmonella strain TA98 (without S9): 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate.
Salmonella strains TA1535 & TA98 (with S9): 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 µg/plate. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: tetrahydrofuran (THF)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test material was immiscible in sterile distilled water, dimethyl sulphoxide and acetone at 50 mg/ml but was fully miscible in tetrahydrofuran at 200 mg/ml in solubility checks performed in-house. Tetrahydrofuran was therefore selected as the vehicle.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rate of TA100
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- THF
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- Without S9 mix
Migrated to IUCLID6: at 3 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous muation rate of TA100
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- THF
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene at 1 µg/plate
- Remarks:
- with S9 mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rate for TA1535
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- THF
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix
Migrated to IUCLID6: at 5 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rate for TA1535
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- THF
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene at 2 µg/plate
- Remarks:
- with S9 mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rate for WP2uvrA
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- THF
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix
Migrated to IUCLID6: at 2 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rate for WP2uvrA
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- THF
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene at 10 µg/plate
- Remarks:
- With S9 mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rate for TA98
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- THF
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix
Migrated to IUCLID6: at 0.2 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rate for TA98
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- THF
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- with S9 mix
Migrated to IUCLID6: at 5 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rate for TA1537
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- THF
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix
Migrated to IUCLID6: at 80 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rate for TA1537
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- THF
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene at 2 µg/plate
- Remarks:
- with S9 mix
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation (experiment 1) and pre-incubation(experiment 2))
DURATION
- Culture Preincubation period: 10h
- Exposure duration: 48 - 72 hrs
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): Not applicable
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 20 minutes
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 48 -72 hrs
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): Not applicable.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Triplicate plating.
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: Not applicable.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: plates were assessed for numbers of revertant colonies and examined for effects on the growth of the bacterial background lawn.
OTHER EXAMINATIONS: None - Evaluation criteria:
- Acceptance Criteria:
The reverse mutation assay may be considered valid if the following criteria are met:
All tester strain cultures exhibit a characteristic number of spontaneous revertants per plate in the vehicle and untreated controls.
The appropriate characteristics for each tester strain have been confirmed, eg rfa cell-wall mutation and pKM101 plasmid R-factor etc.
All tester strain cultures should be in the approximate range of 1 to 9.9 x 109 bacteria per ml.
Each mean positive control value should be at least twice the respective vehicle control value for each strain, thus demonstrating both the intrinsic sensitivity of the tester strains to mutagenic exposure and the integrity of the S9-mix.
There should be a minimum of four non-toxic test material dose levels.
There should not be an excessive loss of plates due to contamination.
Evaluation criteria:
There are several criteria for determining a positive result, such as a dose-related increase in revertant frequency over the dose range tested and/or a reproducible increase at one or more concentrations in at least one bacterial strain with or without metabolic activation. Biological relevance of the results will be considered first, statistical methods, as recommended by the UKEMS can also be used as an aid to evaluation, however, statistical significance will not be the only determining factor for a positive response.
A test material will be considered non-mutagenic (negative) in the test system if the above criteria are not met.
Although most experiments will give clear positive or negative results, in some instances the data generated will prohibit a definitive judgement about the test material activity. Results of this type will be reported as equivocal. - Statistics:
- Standard deviation
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Remarks:
- Tested up to maximum recommended dose of 5000 micro.g/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Remarks:
- Tested up to maximum recommended dose of 5000 micro.g/plate
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- EXAMPLE
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility: The test material was was fully miscible in tetrahydrofuran at 200 mg/ml in solubility checks performed in-house.
- Precipitation: A test material precipitate (greasy in appearance) was noted at 5000 µg/plate, this observation did not prevent the scoring of revertant colonies.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
Preliminary Toxicity Test:
The test material was non-toxic to the strains of bacteria used (TA100 and WP2uvrA-). The test material formulation and S9-mix used in this experiment were both shown to be sterile.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
Prior to use, the master strains were checked for characteristics, viability and spontaneous reversion rate (all were found to be satisfactory).
Results for the negative controls (spontaneous mutation rates) were considered to be acceptable.
All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies thus confirming the activity of the S9-mix and the sensitivity of the bacterial strains.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: None - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Preliminary Toxicity Test
The test material was non-toxic to the strains of bacteria used (TA100 and WP2uvrA-). The test material formulation and S9-mix used in this experiment were both shown to be sterile.
The numbers of revertant colonies for the toxicity assay were:
With (+) or without (-) S9-mix |
Strain |
Dose (µg/plate) |
||||||||||
0 |
0.15 |
0.5 |
1.5 |
5 |
15 |
50 |
150 |
500 |
1500 |
5000 |
||
- |
TA100 |
111 |
110 |
112 |
97 |
112 |
119 |
120 |
112 |
117 |
111P |
101P |
+ |
TA100 |
113 |
106 |
111 |
92 |
109 |
98 |
112 |
106 |
89 |
84P |
80P |
- |
WP2uvrA- |
23 |
29 |
32 |
27 |
27 |
36 |
34 |
33 |
35 |
26P |
27P |
+ |
WP2uvrA- |
35 |
35 |
30 |
36 |
25 |
36 |
37 |
27 |
26 |
32P |
36P |
P precipitate
In the range-finding test (plate incorporation method) the test material caused no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns at any dose level either in the presence or absence of S9. In the main test (pre-incubation method) the test material induced toxicity to the bacterial background lawns of Salmonella strains TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 (absence of S9) and TA1535 (presence of S9) at 5000 µg/plate. No toxicity was noted to any of the remaining bacterial strains. These results were not indicative of toxicity sufficiently severe enough to prevent the test material being tested up to the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 µg/plate. A precipitate (greasy in appearance) was noted at 5000 µg/plate, this observation did not prevent the scoring of revertant colonies.
No toxicologically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test material, either with or without metabolic activation.
All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies thus confirming the activity of the S9-mix and the sensitivity of the bacterial strains.
The individual plate counts, the mean number of revertant colonies and the standard deviations for the test material, vehicle and positive controls both with and without metabolic activation for the Main test are presented in the tables below:
Table1 Spontaneous Mutation Rates (Concurrent Negative Controls)
Range-finding Test (Experiment 1)
Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate) |
|||||||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA- |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||
86 |
|
10 |
|
15 |
|
18 |
|
10 |
|
95 |
(86) |
12 |
(14) |
10 |
(15) |
18 |
(19) |
11 |
(8) |
76 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
|
3 |
|
|
7 |
|
|||||||
21 |
(12)† |
||||||||
9 |
|
Main Test
Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate) |
|||||||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA- |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||
109 |
|
18 |
|
30 |
|
23 |
|
13 |
|
103 |
(103) |
13 |
(16)† |
26 |
(24)† |
23 |
(22)† |
10 |
(11) |
97 |
|
16 |
|
16 |
|
20 |
|
9 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
||||||
27 |
(23)† |
||||||||
22 |
|
Confirmatory Test
Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate) |
|
Base-pair substitution type |
|
TA1535 |
|
13 |
|
13 |
(13) |
12 |
|
† Experintal procedure perford at later dates with and/or without S9 due to a number of factors (see relevant data tables)
Test Period |
From: 16 August 2009 21 August 2009† |
To: 19 August 2009 24 August 2009† |
||||||||||||
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration (µg/plate) |
Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate) |
||||||||||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
|||||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA‑ |
TA98 |
TA1537† |
||||||||||
- |
0 |
90 103 111 |
(101) 10.6# |
19 13 14 |
(15) 3.2 |
26 26 32 |
(28) 3.5 |
35 42 37 |
(38) 3.6 |
15 21 19 |
(18) 3.1 |
|||
- |
50 |
96 97 89 |
(94) 4.4 |
13 11 14 |
(13) 1.5 |
30 27 30 |
(29) 1.7 |
27 41 41 |
(36) 8.1 |
16 9 18 |
(14) 4.7 |
|||
- |
150 |
76 77 123 |
(92) 26.9 |
14 13 19 |
(15) 3.2 |
41 35 31 |
* (36) 5.0 |
47 27 45 |
(40) 11.0 |
18 16 19 |
(18) 1.5 |
|||
- |
500 |
99 103 87 |
(96) 8.3 |
9 16 19 |
(15) 5.1 |
25 31 32 |
(29) 3.8 |
35 32 30 |
(32) 2.5 |
17 19 16 |
(17) 1.5 |
|||
- |
1500 |
84 74 81 |
(80) 5.1 |
13 25 12 |
(17) 7.2 |
24 23 21 |
(23) 1.5 |
27 35 38 |
(33) 5.7 |
18 17 17 |
(17) 0.6 |
|||
- |
5000 |
92 P 117 P 109 P |
(106) 12.8 |
48 P 74 P 60 P |
$$$ (61) 13.0 |
15 P 13 P 15 P |
(14) 1.2 |
29 P 48 P 48 P |
(42) 11.0 |
15 P 19 P 15 P |
(16) 2.3 |
|||
Positive controls
S9-Mix
- |
Name Concentration (μg/plate) No. colonies per plate |
ENNG |
ENNG |
ENNG |
4NQO |
9AA |
||||||||
3 |
5 |
2 |
0.2 |
80 |
||||||||||
529 543 646 |
(573) 63.9 |
375 455 378 |
(403) 45.3 |
569 732 798 |
(700) 117.9 |
117 118 123 |
(119) 3.2 |
530 479 488 |
(499) 27.2 |
|||||
† Experimental procedure performed at later date due to high solvent control counts in original test
ENNG N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
4NQO 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide
9AA 9-Aminoacridine
P Precipitate
* p£0.05
$$$ p£0.005
# Standard deviation
Test Period |
From: 16 August 2009 |
To: 19 August 2009 |
||||||||||
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration (µg/plate) |
Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate) |
||||||||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
|||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA‑ |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||||||||
+ |
0 |
118 112 81 |
(104) 19.9# |
11 16 15 |
(14) 2.6 |
22 37 22 |
(27) 8.7 |
37 38 20 |
(32) 10.1 |
4 12 14 |
(10) 5.3 |
|
+ |
50 |
76 89 68 |
(78) 10.6 |
11 12 10 |
(11) 1.0 |
29 27 29 |
(28) 1.2 |
30 29 36 |
(32) 3.8 |
14 5 11 |
(10) 4.6 |
|
+ |
150 |
91 97 80 |
(89) 8.6 |
8 10 5 |
(8) 2.5 |
32 30 31 |
(31) 1.0 |
21 15 31 |
(22) 8.1 |
5 7 9 |
(7) 2.0 |
|
+ |
500 |
110 124 110 |
(115) 8.1 |
9 20 14 |
(14) 5.5 |
25 32 35 |
(31) 5.1 |
31 19 22 |
(24) 6.2 |
12 11 12 |
(12) 0.6 |
|
+ |
1500 |
130 110 101 |
(114) 14.8 |
12 14 10 |
(12) 2.0 |
32 26 29 |
(29) 3.0 |
26 32 24 |
(27) 4.2 |
8 8 5 |
(7) 1.7 |
|
+ |
5000 |
140 P 117 P 111 P |
(123) 15.3 |
35 P 21 P 35 P |
$$$ (30) 8.1 |
33 P 31 P 29 P |
(31) 2.0 |
20 P 19 P 18 P |
(19) 1.0 |
9 P 14 P 9 P |
(11) 2.9 |
|
Positive controls
S9-Mix
+ |
Name Concentration (μg/plate) No. colonies per plate |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
BP |
2AA |
||||||
1 |
2 |
10 |
5 |
2 |
||||||||
1911 2195 1800 |
(1969) 203.7 |
192 216 207 |
(205) 12.1 |
378 341 414 |
(378) 36.5 |
95 96 125 |
(105) 17.0 |
465 364 518 |
(449) 78.2 |
|||
BP Benzo(a)pyrene
2AA 2-Aminoanthracene
P Precipitate
$$$ p£0.005
# Standard deviation
See Overall remarks for rest of tables
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative EXAMPLE
The test material was, therefore, considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test. - Executive summary:
Introduction.
The method was designed to conform to the guidelines for bacterial mutagenicity testing published by the major Japanese Regulatory Authorities including METI, MHLW and MAFF. It alsoets the requirents of the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No. 471 "Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test", Method B13/14 of Commission Regulation (EC) number 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 and the USA, EPA (TSCA) OPPTS harmonised guidelines.
Methods.
Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA- were treated with the test material using both the Ames plate incorporation and pre-incubation methods at up to seven dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolising system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for the range-finding test was determined in a preliminary toxicity assay and was 50 to 5000 µg/plate. The experiment was repeated on a separate day (pre-incubation method) using fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test material formulations. The dose range for Experiment 2 ranged between 1.5 and 5000 µg/plate and had to be amended for several of the bacterial strains because of toxicity due to the exposure method (pre-incubation instead of plate incorporation).
Additional dose levels and an expanded dose range were selected (where applicable) in order to achieve both four non-toxic dose levels and the toxic limit of the test material.
In addition, a third experiment was performed to confirm whether a statistically significant increase in TA1535 revertant colony frequency, noted in the range-finding test, was real or spurious. The experiment was carried out using bacterial strain TA1535, in the presence and absence of S9 and employed a narrowed test material dose range of 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000 and 5000 µg/plate. This experiment was a repeat of the methodology used in the range-finding test (plate incorporation).
Results.
The vehicle (tetrahydrofuran) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated.
In the range-finding test (plate incorporation method) the test material caused no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns at any dose level either in the presence or absence of S9. In the main test (pre-incubation method) the test material induced toxicity to the bacterial background lawns of Salmonella strains TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 (absence of S9) and TA1535 (presence of S9) at 5000 µg/plate. No toxicity was noted to any of the remaining bacterial strains. These results were not indicative of toxicity sufficiently severe enough to prevent the test material being tested up to the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 µg/plate. A test material precipitate (greasy in appearance) was noted at 5000 µg/plate, this observation did not prevent the scoring of revertant colonies.
No toxicologically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test material, either with or without metabolic activation.
Results fromthe first experiment (range-finding test, plate incorporation method) showed small but statistically significant increases in the frequency of TA1535 revertant colonies at a test material dose level of 5000 µg/plate in the absence of metabolic activation (S9). Smaller increases were also observed at the same dose level in the presence of S9. However, no increases were noted in Experiment 2 (main test) which employed the pre-incubation method (toxicity was noted to the bacterial background lawns at 5000 µg/plate).A third, confirmatory experiment was, therefore, performed which was designed to confirm the reproducibility and relevance of the responses. The experiment employed a tightened test material dose range (1000 to 5000 µg/plate) and used the same experimental conditions as the range-finding test (plate incorporation method). In this experiment, small, statistically significant increases were noted (absence of S9 only) at 4000 and 5000 µg/plate.
Although a small but consistent response was observed for TA1535 at the highest dose levels (plate incorporation method only), it was considered doubtful that the test material was causing a true mutagenic effect for the following reasons:
There was no response noted for Salmonella strain TA100 (the sister strain to TA1535) which raised the first concern as to whether the TA1535 response should be classified as being positive as the only difference between the two strains is that TA100 contains the plasmid pKM101, which generally makes this strain the more sensitive of the two for mutagen detection (8). This concern was further strengthened by the evaluation of the dose-response curve, which was a plateau at dose levels above 4000 µg/plate.The inclusion of the intermediary dose levels (1000, 2000, 3000 and 4000 µg/plate)should have induced a much clearer response (if the response was truly positive there should have been a clear, dose-related increase).The main test proved that the test material exhibited toxic effects under certain circumstances or exposure concentrations (the pre-incubation modification exposes the bacteria to a much higher concentration for the incubation period). Therefore, the small increases in colony numbers were considered an artefact resulting from a modest level of toxicity to this strain of bacteria (TA1535). There are a number of factors that may affect the spontaneous or background frequency of colony numbers and the threshold nature of the response seen in this study may indicate that the response was caused by an indirect mechanism causing an increase in the spontaneous rate of mutation rather than mutagenicity (direct or indirect).A possible mechanism may be that low level toxicity has caused a selective effect on the number of bacterial cells plated out onto Vogel-Bonner agar plates, resulting in an increase in non-revertant histidine-dependent bacteria.
Conclusion.
The test material was, therefore, considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test.
(8) Prival M J and Zeiger E (1998)Mutation Research,412, 251-260.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.