Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Repeated dose toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
other information
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Only secondary literature available
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
Chlortoluidine (3-Chlor-2-methylanilin, 5-Chlor-2-methylanilin, 3-Chlor-4-methylanilin)
Author:
Gesellschaft Deutscher Chemiker
Year:
1990
Bibliographic source:
Beratergremium für umweltrelevante Altstoffe (BUA), BUA-Stoffbericht 55
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1978

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Subacute pre-study for carcinogenicity study.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
5-chloro-o-toluidine
EC Number:
202-452-6
EC Name:
5-chloro-o-toluidine
Cas Number:
95-79-4
Molecular formula:
C7H8ClN
IUPAC Name:
5-chloro-2-methylaniline

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Fischer 344
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: A. R. Schmidt, Madison, Wisconsin; Laboratory Supply Company, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana; and Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Inc., Wilmington, Massachusetts.
- Age at study initiation: approximately 6 weeks
- Housing: 4 per cage
- Diet: The basal laboratory diet for both dosed and control animals consisted of Wayne Lab-Blox® meal (Allied Mills, Inc., Chicago, Illinois) ad libitum.
- Water: Acidulated water (pH 2.5) ad libitum.
- Acclimation period: two weeks

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 - 26
- Humidity (%): 45 - 55
- Air changes (per hr): 12 - 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 16/8

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: feed
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on oral exposure:
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): once weekly
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): Wayne Lab-Blox® meal
- Storage temperature of food: in the dark at 4°C
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Duration of treatment / exposure:
four weeks
Frequency of treatment:
daily
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
315, 680, 1465, 3155 and 6800 mg/kg food
Basis:
nominal in diet
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
31.5, 68.0, 146.5, 315.5, and 680 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
actual ingested
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
yes, plain diet
Details on study design:
- Post-exposure recovery period in satellite groups: all animals for two weeks

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Individual body weights were recorded twice weekly throughout the study.

MORTALITY AND CLINICAL SYMPTOMS: Yes

Sacrifice and pathology:
Upon termination of the study all survivors were euthanized and necropsied.
Statistics:
Probabilities of survival were estimated by the product-limit procedure of Kaplan and Meier (1958). Animals were statistically censored as of the time that they died of other than natural causes or were found to be missing; animals dying from natural causes were not statistically censored. Statistical analyses for a possible dose-related effect on survival used the method of Cox (1972) when testing two groups for equality and used Tarone's (1975) extensions of Cox's methods when testing a dose-related trend. One-tailed P-values have been reported for all tests except the departure from linearity test, which is only reported when its two-tailed P-value is less than 0.05.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Details on results:
MORTALITY: All animals survived.

BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN: At the highest dose all animals showed a reduced weight gain.

HISTOPATHOLOGY: All animals even in the lowest dose had mottled livers. In male rats additonally spotted kidneys were observed.

Effect levels

Dose descriptor:
LOAEL
Effect level:
31.5 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: lowest dose tested, mottled livers

Target system / organ toxicity

Critical effects observed:
not specified

Any other information on results incl. tables

Study results:

 

Mean Body weight Gain (%)a

Survivalb

Observation of Abnormal Signsb

ppm

Males

Females

Males

Females

Males

Females

5800

- 35

- 21

5/5

5/5

5/5c,d

5/5c

3155

+ 23

- 3

5/5

5/5

5/5c,d

5/5c

1465

- 19

+ 3

5/5

5/5

5/5c,d

5/5c

680

+ 8

+ 5

5/5

5/5

5/5c,d

5/5c

315

+ 18

+ 4

5/5

5/5

5/5c,d

5/5c

0

--

--

5/5

5/5

0/5

0/5

a+ is indicative of mean body weight gain greater than that of controls.

a- is indicative of mean body weight gain less than that of controls.

b Number of animals observed/number of animals originally in group.

c These rats had mottled livers.

d These rats had spotted kidneys.

Applicant's summary and conclusion