Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 402-860-6 | CAS number: 110553-27-0 CG 25-1320; IRGANOX 1520; TK 12229/1
Repeated dose toxicity: oral
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- other: Body responsible for the test
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 988
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.7 (Repeated Dose (28 Days) Toxicity (Oral))
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 4,6-bis(octylthiomethyl)-o-cresol
- EC Number:
- 402-860-6
- EC Name:
- 4,6-bis(octylthiomethyl)-o-cresol
- Cas Number:
- 110553-27-0
- Molecular formula:
- C25H44OS2
- IUPAC Name:
- 4,6-bis(octylthiomethyl)-o-cresol
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- other: Albino rats Tif: RAlf (SPF), hybrids of RII
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: distilled water containing 0.5% CMC and 0.1% Tween 80
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 28 days
- Frequency of treatment:
- 7 days/week
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Male: 5 animals at 0 mg/kg bw/day
Male: 5 animals at 10 mg/kg bw/day
Male: 5 animals at 50 mg/kg bw/day
Male: 5 animals at 250 mg/kg bw/day
Male: 5 animals at 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Female: 5 animals at 0 mg/kg bw/day
Female: 5 animals at 10 mg/kg bw/day
Female: 5 animals at 50 mg/kg bw/day
Female: 5 animals at 250 mg/kg bw/day
Female: 5 animals at 1000 mg/kg bw/day
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Details on results:
- Clinical observations:
No clinical symptoms related to the administration of the test article and no signs of systemic toxicity were observed during the study.
Laboratory findings: the finding in treated groups were unremarkable and comparable to those of the controls. The investigations revealed a minimal higher ativity of alkaline phosphatase in the male of group 4 (250 mg/kg) and male and females of the high dose group (1000 mg/kg).
Effects in organs:
- Eye examinations performed before and towards the end of the treatment period revealed no evidence of reaction to the treatment.
- A trend to slightly increased liver weights was observed in treated males group 4 and 5 (250+1000 mg/kg) and in females group 5.
- Macroscopical and microscopical examination revealed no changes which could be attributed to effects of the test compound.
No toxic effect level: 50 mg/kg bw.
Effect levels
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 250 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: original NCD unit is mg/kg/day
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Basis for effect level:
- other: original NCD unit is mg/kg/day
Target system / organ toxicity
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Not classified.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
