Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
25 Sept. to 9th Oct. 2003
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2004
Report date:
2004

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
ethyl 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-6-(4-nitrophenyl)-7-oxo-1H,4H,5H,6H,7H-pyrazolo[3,4-c]pyridine-3-carboxylate
EC Number:
611-033-0
Cas Number:
536759-91-8
Molecular formula:
C22H20N4O6
IUPAC Name:
ethyl 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-6-(4-nitrophenyl)-7-oxo-1H,4H,5H,6H,7H-pyrazolo[3,4-c]pyridine-3-carboxylate
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
powder; stored at room temperature in the dark

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
other:
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
At the start of the study the mice were in the weight range of 18.9 to 22.9 grams and were eight to twelve weeks old. Animals were acclimatised for 7 days prior to the study. Free access to mains drinking water and food was allowed through out the study. The temperature and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 21+- 2 C and 40 to 70% respectively. The lighting was controlled by a time switch to give 12 hours continuous light and 12 hours of darkness.

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
Concentration:
test material at concentrations of 5%, 10% or 25% w/w
No. of animals per dose:
Three groups of five animals each were treated at each concentration group and a further group of five animals were treated as a control group with acetone/olive oil alone.
Details on study design:
The mice were treated by daily application of 25 μl of the appropriate concentration of the test material to the dorsal surface of each ear for three consecutive days (Days 1, 2, 3) by using a micropipette whose tip is used to spread the formulation over the dorsal surface of each ear. On Day 6 all mice were injected with 250 ul of a phophate buffered saline solution containing 3H-methyl thymidine (3HTdR ) to the tail vein giving a total of 20 uCi to each mouse. All animals were observed twice daily on Day 1, 2 and 3 and once daily on days 4 ,5, and 6. Any signs of toxicity or ill health were noted. Body weights of each mouse were recorded before dosing and before termination. Five hours after administration of 3HTdR all mice were killed by carbon dioxide asphyxiation and their auricular lymph nodes were excised and a 1 ml of phosphate buffered saline was added to each set of lymph nodes. Preparation of a single cell suspension was completed for the lymph nodes cells for each individual animal following standard procedures. Determination of the 3HTdR incorporation was completed by measuring radioactive disintegration for each animal's lymph node cells by using a beta-scintillation counter.
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
Statistics:
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out on the data followed by Barlett's test for analysis of homogenicity of variance. Comparisons were made beween the control and treatment groups using Dunnett's test.

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
α-Hexylcinnamaldehyde, was considered to be a sensitiser under the conditions of the test with test control ration obtained for 25% v/v HCA at 8.4.

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
0.7
Test group / Remarks:
at 5%
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
0.8
Test group / Remarks:
at 10%
Key result
Parameter:
SI
Value:
0.6
Test group / Remarks:
at 25%

Any other information on results incl. tables

There were no deaths. No signs of systemic toxicity were noted in the test or control animals during the test. Greasy fur was noted for all control and test animals. Particles on the ears was noted post dose from day 1 and resolved by day 5.

 
 

Concentration (% w/w) in acetone

 

Stimulation Index (SI)

 Results
 5  0.7  negative
 10  0.8  negative
 25  0.6  negative

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Conclusions:
The test material was considered to be a non-sensitiser under the conditions of the test.