Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
oxidising solids
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From 7 August 2008 to 30 October 2008
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Compliant to GLP and testing guideline; adequate coherence between data, comments and conclusions.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2008
Report date:
2008

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.17 (Oxidising Properties (Solids))
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
-
EC Number:
426-290-2
EC Name:
-
Cas Number:
74149-72-7
Molecular formula:
C20H20N2O7
IUPAC Name:
methyl 4-[4-(4-methoxybenzamido)-3-nitrophenyl]-3-methyl-4-oxobutanoate
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Gamma Nap
- Substance type: monoconstituent
- Physical state: solid (powder)
- Analytical purity: 99.9%
- Impurities: sum is 0.1%
- Purity test date: January 2008
- Lot/batch No.: 07/004/2
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: January 2009
- Storage condition of test material: protected from light, at room temperature

Study design

Contact with:
powdered cellulose

Results and discussion

Test results (Oxidising solids)open allclose all
Sample tested:
test mixture (not specified)
Remarks:
migrated information
Parameter:
maximum burning rate
Result:
ca. 3.125 other: mm/s (migrated information)
Sample tested:
reference mixture (not specified)
Remarks:
migrated information
Parameter:
maximum burning rate
Result:
ca. 3.509 other: mm/s (migrated information)

Any other information on results incl. tables

Preliminary test:

The test item ignited for 2 minutes and 59 seconds.

The maximum burning rate of the test item / cellulose mixture was lower than the maximum burning rate with reference item / cellulose mixture

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: no oxidising properties
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
Under the experimental conditions, the test item was not considered to have oxidizing properties.
Executive summary:

Under the experimental conditions, the test item was not considered to have oxidizing properties.