Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation
Remarks:
other: Read-across & category approach
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Category is coherent for more than 10 endpoints. Eye irritation was assessed using 11 OECD-405 studies and 2 OECD-407 studies.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2014

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment - Chapter R.6: QSARs and grouping of chemicals - May 2008.
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
Not relevant for category approach

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
D-pentose, oligomeric, C10 and C12 alkyl glycosides
EC Number:
940-644-8
IUPAC Name:
D-pentose, oligomeric, C10 and C12 alkyl glycosides

Results and discussion

In vivo

Results
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: day-1
Score:
ca. 4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 9 days
Remarks on result:
other: APP-10-dp2, see APP report

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye)
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Based on 11 OECD-405 and 2 OECD-407 studies, APP with short alkyl chain appear as borderline between eye irritation/damage cat. 2 and 1. Strict application of CLP rules drive a classification 1, as this classification may be very conservative, an SCL is proposed.