Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Acute toxicity: oral: LD50 (combined, rat) > 5000 mg/kg bw (OECD 401, GLP, K, rel.2)
Acute toxicity: dermal: LD50 (combined, rat) > 2000 mg/kg bw (OECD 402, GLP, K, rel.1)
Acute toxicity: inhalation: waiving
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study without detailed documentation
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: A.smith, Warlingham, Surrey
- Housing: in single sex groups of five in grid bottomed polypropylene cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): commercial available pelleted rodent diet (modified 41B supplied by Pilsbury's Ltd of Birmingham), ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): drinking water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-22
- Humidity (%): 54-64
- Air changes (per hr): not reported
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: 0.25% aqueous solution of gum tragacanth
- Details on oral exposure:
- The material was suspended in a 0.25% aqueous solution of gum tragacanth to give a dose volume of 10mL/kg at a dose level of 5.0g/kg. The material was dosed by peroral onjection using a rubber cathether attached to a syringe of suitable capacity. After dosing animals were returned to their cages and permitted access to food and water.
- Doses:
- 5.0 g / kg bw
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- five male and five female
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- All animals were examined frequently after dosing and then daily for fourteen consecutive days. Any signs of toxicity or other effects were noted along with the time of onset and duration. Animals were weighed at weekly intervals.
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 5 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Clinical signs:
- other: No effects of treatment were observed throught the duration of the study and no abnormalities were detected at necropsy
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Under the test conditions, the substance is not classified according to the Annex I of the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 (CLP) and to the GHS as the estimated oral LD50 is higher than 5000 mg/kg bw.
- Executive summary:
In an acute oral toxicity study performed according the OECD Guideline 401, following overnight fasting a group of five male and five female rats were administered the test material, by peroral injection, at a dose level of 5.0g/kg bodyweight in a dose volume of 10mL/kg. All animals were observed for fourteen day period for any signs of toxicity or other effects of treatment. No effects of treatment were observed throughout the duration of the study and no abnormalities were detected at necropsy.
The results of this study indicate that the test material has no toxic effect when administrated as a single oral dose to the rat at a level of 5.0g/kg bodyweight.
Oral LD 50 Combined > 5000 mg / kg bw
Under the test conditions, test material is not classified according to the Annex I of the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 (CLP) and to the GHS as the oral LD50 is higher than 5000 mg/kg bw.
This study is considered as acceptable and satisfies the requirement for acute oral toxicity endpoint.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 5 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- The key study is GLP compliant and of high quality (Klimisch score = 2)
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 4/6/2008-14/08/2008
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- According to the OECD Guideline and in compliance with GLP
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Test type:
- fixed dose procedure
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Remarks:
- HanRcc:WIST (SPF)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: RCC Ltd
- Age at study initiation: male: 9 weeks; female: 11 weeks
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Pelleted standard Provimi Kliba 3433 rat/mouse maintenance diet, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Community tap water, ad libitum
- Housing: groups of five per sex in Makrolon type-4 cages with standard sotwood bedding during acclimatisation ; then individually in Makrolon type-3 cages with standard softwood bedding during treatment and observation period.
- Acclimation period: not reported
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22±3
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): 10-15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Vehicle:
- water
- Remarks:
- purified water
- Details on dermal exposure:
- TEST SITE
- % coverage: 10
TEST MATERIAL
- Concentration (if solution): 0.5g /mL
- Volume dosage: 4 mL / kg bw - Duration of exposure:
- The application period was 24 hours.
- Doses:
- 2000 mg/kg
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 males
5 females - Control animals:
- not required
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: daily during the acclimatization period, during the first 30 minutes and at approximately 1, 2, 3 and 5 hours after administration on test day 1, and twice daily during days 2-15.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, local signs, body weight, macroscopic examinations at necropsy. - Statistics:
- No statistical analysis was used.
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- No deaths ocurred during the study
- Clinical signs:
- other: No clinical signs were during the course of the study. A moderate erythema was noted in all animals on test day 2 and persisted as slight up to test days 9 or 10. Slight to moderate scaling was observed in all animals from test days 3 or 6 to up to test d
- Gross pathology:
- No macroscopic finding were observed at necropsy
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Under the test conditions, the dermal LD50 for the registered substance is higher than 2000 mg/kg bw in rats therefore it is not classified according to the Annex I of the Regulation EC No. 1272/2008 (CLP) and to the GHS.
- Executive summary:
In an acute dermal toxicity study (limit test) performed according to the OECD test guideline No. 402 and in compliance with GLP, five male and five female rats were treated with the substance at 2000 mg/kg by dermal application. The test item was diluted in vehicle (purified water) at a concentration of 0.5g/mL and administered at a volume dosage of 4mL/kg. The test site was covered with a semi-occlusive dressing for 24 hours. Animals were observed for mortality, clinical signs, local signs and body weights for 14 days and at the end of the study the surviving animals were sacrificed for macroscopic examination.
No clinical signs were observed throught the duration of the study. A moderate erythema was noted in all animals on test day 2 and persisted as slight up to test days 9 or 10. Slight to moderate scaling was observed in all animals from test days 3 or 6 to up to test days 10 or 15. Slight crusts were noted in two males on test days 6 to 10. Slight oedema was noted in all females on test days 3 to 5. No abnormalities were detected at necropsy.
Bodyweights were within the range commonly recorded for this strain and age. No abnormalities were noted at necropsy.
Dermal LD50 Combined > 2000 mg / kg bw
Under the test conditions, the dermal LD50 for the registered substance is higher than 2000 mg/kg bw in rats therefore it is not classified according to the Annex I of the Regulation EC No. 1272/2008 (CLP) and to the GHS.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- The key study is GLP compliant and of high quality (Klimisch score = 1)
Additional information
Acute toxicity: oral:
A key study was identified (Toxicol lab. 1986). In this limit acute oral toxicity study performed according to the OECD test guideline No. 401 and in compliance with GLP, fasted rats (5 males and 5 females) were treated with the test material at a dose level of 5000 mg/kg bw. The animals were observed for any signs of toxicity or other effects for 14 days. No effects of treatment were observed throught the duration of the study and no abnormalities were detected at necropsy.
Oral LD50 (combined rats) > 5000 mg/kg bw.
Acute toxicity: dermal:
A key study was identified (RCC, 2008). In this limit acute dermal toxicity study performed according to the OECD test guideline No. 402 and in compliance with GLP, HanRcc:WIST (SPF) rats (5 males and 5 females) were treated with the test material at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg bw. The animals were observed for mortality, clinical signs, irritation and body weight for 15days. No clinical signs were observed throught the duration of the study. A moderate erythema was noted in all animals on test day 2 and persisted as slight up to test days 9 or 10. Slight to moderate scaling was observed in all animals from test days 3 or 6 to up to test days 10 or 15. Slight crusts were noted in two males on test days 6 to 10. Slight oedema was noted in all females on test days 3 to 5. No abnormalities were detected at necropsy.
Dermal LD50 (combined rats) > 2000 mg/kg bw.
However, according to ECHA R7a guidance (2016), further study need not to be conducted because the substance does not meet the criteria for classification for acute toxicity or STOT-SE by the oral route and no systemic toxicity was observed in the existing acute dermal toxicity study up to 2000 mg/kg bw, nor in the GPMT study. Thus, the dermal LD50 is expected to be higher than 5000 mg/kg bw.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Harmonised classification:
The substance has no harmonised classification according to the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Self classification:
Acute toxicity via Oral route:
Under the test conditions, the substance is not classified according to the Annex I of the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 (CLP) and to the GHS as the estimated oral LD50 is higher than 5000 mg/kg bw.
Acute toxicity via Dermal route:
Based on the available data, the substance is not classified according to the Annex I of the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 (CLP) and to the GHS as the estimated oral LD50 is expected to be higher than 5000 mg/kg bw.
Acute toxicity (Inhalation):
No data was available.
Specific target organ toxicity: single exposure (Oral):
The classification criteria according to the Annex I of the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 as specific target organ toxicant (STOT) – single exposure, oral are not met since no reversible or irreversible adverse health effects were observed immediately or delayed after exposure and no effects were observed at the guidance value (oral) for a Category 1 classification (C≤ 300 mg/kg bw) and at the guidance value (oral) for a Category 2 classification (2000 mg/kg bw≥C > 300 mg/kg bw). No classification is required.
The criteria for Transient Organ effects (STOT-SE Category 3) according to Annex I of the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 are not met since narcotic effects were not observed in the acute oral toxicity study.
Specific target organ toxicity: single exposure (Dermal):
Based on available data via both the oral and dermal route, the classification criteria according to the Annex I of the Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 as specific target organ toxicant (STOT) – single dermal exposure Category 1 or 2 are not considered to be met. No classification is required.
The criteria for Transient Organ effects (STOT-SE Category 3) according to Annex I of the Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 are not met since narcotic effects were not observed in the acute dermal toxicity study.
Specific target organ toxicity: single exposure (Inhalation):
No data was available.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
