Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-805-4 | CAS number: 99-97-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- data is from experimental reports
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 014
- Report date:
- 2014
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The objective of the study was to assess the irritant and/or corrosive effects of the test chemical on eye, when exposed by the ocular route in rabbits
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine
- EC Number:
- 202-805-4
- EC Name:
- N,N-dimethyl-p-toluidine
- Cas Number:
- 99-97-8
- Molecular formula:
- C9H13N
- IUPAC Name:
- N,N,4-trimethylaniline
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material: Benzenamine, N,N,N-trimethyl-
- Common Name: N,N-Dimethyl-p-toluidine
- Molecular formula: C9H13N
- Molecular weight: 135.209 g/mol
- Smiles notation: c1(N(C)C)ccc(C)cc1
- InChl: 1S/C9H13N/c1-8-4-6-9(7-5-8)10(2)3/h4-7H,1-3H3
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: liquid
- Purity: Greater than 99%.
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Procured from LIVEON BOLABS PVT. LTD,
- Age at study initiation: 2.0 to 3.5 Months (Approximately)
- Weight at study initiation: Minimum: 1.644 kg and Maximum: 1.674 kg (Prior to Treatment)
- Housing: The animals were housed individually in stainless steel cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): All animals were provided conventional laboratory rabbit diet (Nutrivet Life Sciences, Pune) ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Aqua guard filtered tap water was provided ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 6 days (Animal No.-1) and 9 days (Animal No. 2 and 3)
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): Minimum: 19.50 °C and Maximum: 21.30 °C
- Humidity (%): Minimum: 47.90 % and Maximum: 59.70 %
- Air changes (per hr): More than 12 changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12:12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To:
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 ml
- Concentration (if solution):N/A - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 1 hrs
- Observation period (in vivo):
- All the three treated animals were observed at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after instillation of test item
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- no data available
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 female rabbits
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): washing was done with normal saline
- Time after start of exposure:N/A
SCORING SYSTEM:
Grading of irritation lesions was carried out as per draize method
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: ophthalmoscope
Results and discussion
In vivo
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: within 72 hrs
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: within 72 hrs
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.67
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: within 72 hrs
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.33
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: within 72 hrs
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The following were observed in treated rabbits.
Observation at 1 hour after instillation of test item revealed: Cornea- No ulceration or opacity in all the animals; Area of Opacity- Zero in all the animals; Iris: Normal in all the animals. Conjunctivae - Some blood vessels definitely hyperaemic (injected) was observed in all the animals; Chemosis: Some swelling above normal (includes nictitating membranes) was observed in all the animals.
Observation at 24 hours after instillation of test item revealed: Cornea- No ulceration or opacity in all the animals; Area of Opacity- Zero in all the animals; Iris:Normal in all the animals. Conjunctivae - Some blood vessels definitely hyperaemic (injected) was observed in all the animals; Chemosis: Some swelling above normal (includes nictitating membranes) was observed in animal no. 2 whereas no swelling (normal) in animal no. 1 and 3.
At 24 hours observation the rabbits were examined for corneal epithelium cell damage using sodium fluorescein strips and noticed 0% damage in all the animals.
Observation at 48 hours after instillation of test item revealed: Cornea- No ulceration or opacity in all the animals; Area of Opacity- Zero in all the animals; Iris:Normal in all the animals. Conjunctivae - Some blood vessels definitely hyperaemic (injected) was observed in all the animals; Chemosis: No swelling (normal)was observed in all the animals.
Observation at 72 hour after instillation of test item revealed: Cornea- No ulceration or opacity in all the animals; Area of Opacity- Zero in all the animals; Iris: Normal in all the animals. Conjunctivae - Blood vessels normal in all the animals; Chemosis: No swelling (normal) was observed in all the animals.
The individual mean score for animal nos. 1, 2 and 3 at 24, 48, 72 hours for corneal opacity, iris, conjunctiva and chemosis were found 0.00, 0.00, 0.67, 0.00; 0.00, 0.00, 0.67, 0.33 and 0.00, 0.00, 0.67, 0.00 respectively. - Other effects:
- Clinical Observation
No systemic toxicity was observed in treated rabbits during the experimental period.
Mortality
No mortality was observed during the observation period.
Body weight
All rabbits were increased in body weight at termination when compared to day 0.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Individual Animal Eye Irritation Scores
In Treated area Dose:0.1 ml of test item (as such, undiluted) Sex:Female
Animal Numbers |
1 |
2 |
3 |
||||||||||||
Application Side |
Left |
Left |
Left |
||||||||||||
Eye Reactions |
At hour |
At hour |
At hour |
||||||||||||
* |
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
* |
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
* |
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
|
Corneal Opacity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Area of Opacity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Iris |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Conjunctiva |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
Chemosis |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Corneal Damage% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Key:*= Pre-exposure eye examination.
Dose:Untreated (Control Eye) Sex:Female
Animal Numbers |
1 |
2 |
3 |
||||||||||||
Application Side |
Left |
Left |
Left |
||||||||||||
Eye Reactions |
At hour |
At hour |
At hour |
||||||||||||
* |
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
* |
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
* |
1 |
24 |
48 |
72 |
|
Corneal Opacity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Area of Opacity |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Iris |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Conjunctiva |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Chemosis |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Corneal Damage% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Key:*= Pre-exposure eye examination.
Eye Irritation Scores - Mean Values after 24, 48, 72 Hours (Treated eye)
Animal No. Eye Reaction |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Corneal Opacity |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Iris |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
Conjunctiva |
0.67 |
0.67 |
0.67 |
Chemosis |
0.00 |
0.33 |
0.00 |
Formula :
Mean Eye Irritation Score =
Sum of the Individual Animal Score for eye reactionat24, 48 and 72 hours
Number of the Observations (3)
Individual Animal ClinicalSigns
Sex:Female
Animal No. |
Days (Post application observation) |
|||
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Key:1 = Normal
Individual Animal Body Weight
Sex :Female
Animal No. |
Animal Body Weight (kg) |
|
Prior to application |
At termination |
|
1 |
1.674 |
1.750 |
2 |
1.644 |
1.690 |
3 |
1.658 |
1.706 |
Key:kg = Kilogram
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not irritating
- Conclusions:
- The individual mean score for animal nos. 1, 2 and 3 at 24, 48, 72 hours for corneal opacity, iris, conjunctiva and chemosis were found 0.00, 0.00, 0.67, 0.00; 0.00, 0.00, 0.67, 0.33 and 0.00, 0.00, 0.67, 0.00 respectively.Hence, under the experimental conditions, it was concluded that the test chemical was “Non Irritant” to New Zealand White female rabbit eyes and was being classified as Category “Not Classified as an Eye Irritant” as per CLP criteria.
- Executive summary:
Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion Study of the test chemical was performed as per OECD guideline no. 405.3 female New Zealand White Rabbits free from injury of eye were selected for the study. The eyes of all the rabbits were examined 24 hours prior to treatment. One eye of each rabbit served as control and other as treated. Control eye was left untreated whereas; 0.1 ml (as such, undiluted) of test chemical was instilled in the other (treated) eye of each rabbit. The eye was observed at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after test chemical instillation. Ophthalmoscope was used for scoring of eye lesions. In the initial test, 0.1 ml of test chemical was applied into the conjunctival sac of the right eye of animal no.1 whereas the left eye of the rabbit served as the control. As animal no. 1 showed no severe ocular lesions a confirmatory test was conducted on additional two rabbits (animal no. 2 and 3); 0.1 ml of test chemical was instilled into the conjunctival sac of right eye of both the rabbits and left eye served as the control. Untreated eye of all the three rabbits was normal throughout the experimental period of 72 hours. All the three treated animals were observed at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after instillation of test chemical. Grading of irritation lesions was carried out as per Draize method. Observation at 1 hour after instillation of test chemical revealed: Cornea- No ulceration or opacity in all the animals; Area of Opacity- Zero in all the animals; Iris: Normal in all the animals. Conjunctivae - Some blood vessels definitely hyperaemic (injected) was observed in all the animals; Chemosis: Some swelling above normal (includes nictitating membranes) was observed in all the animals. Observation at 24 hours after instillation of test chemical revealed: Cornea- No ulceration or opacity in all the animals; Area of Opacity- Zero in all the animals; Iris:Normal in all the animals. Conjunctivae - Some blood vessels definitely hyperaemic (injected) was observed in all the animals; Chemosis: Some swelling above normal (includes nictitating membranes) was observed in animal no. 2 whereas no swelling (normal) in animal no. 1 and 3. At 24 hours observation the rabbits were examined for corneal epithelium cell damage using sodium fluorescein strips and noticed 0% damage in all the animals. Observation at 48 hours after instillation of test chemical revealed: Cornea- No ulceration or opacity in all the animals; Area of Opacity- Zero in all the animals; Iris:Normal in all the animals. Conjunctivae - Some blood vessels definitely hyperaemic (injected) was observed in all the animals; Chemosis: No swelling (normal)was observed in all the animals. Observation at 72 hours after instillation of test chemical revealed: Cornea- No ulceration or opacity in all the animals; Area of Opacity- Zero in all the animals; Iris: Normal in all the animals. Conjunctivae - Blood vessels normal in all the animals; Chemosis: No swelling (normal) was observed in all the animals. The individual mean score for animal nos. 1, 2 and 3 at 24, 48, 72 hours for corneal opacity, iris, conjunctiva and chemosis were found 0.00, 0.00, 0.67, 0.00; 0.00, 0.00, 0.67, 0.33 and 0.00, 0.00, 0.67, 0.00 respectively. Hence, under the experimental conditions, it was concluded that the test chemical was “Non Irritant” to New Zealand White female rabbit eyes and was being classified as Category “Not Classified as an Eye Irritant” as per CLP criteria.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.