Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1994
Report date:
1994

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
LLNA method was not available at the time of testing

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Ostalanova sed BL
IUPAC Name:
Ostalanova sed BL
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
non pregnant and nulliparous
At delivery, the veterinary certificate guaranteeing the declared medical condition of experimental animals are carriers of the parasite pathogenic microorganisms viruses and fungi

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
0.5% in water pro injection
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
0.5% in water pro injection
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS: Animals were exposed to patch test substances at 25% in petroleum, 5%, % and 0,5% in water pro injection on the side with for 24 hours. 1 h after removal of dressing the local irritation was assessed. The results show that a concentration more than 0.5% of Ostolanova sed BL in water for injection is skin irritating to guinea pigs.


MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE intradermal
- No. of exposures: 2 replicate for each injection
- Test groups: 20 females
- Control group: 10 females
- Site: neck
- Concentrations:
injection #1 test group: Freund's complete adjuvant
injection #2 test group: 0.5% ostalanova sed in water for injection
injection #3 test group: 0.5% ostalanova sed in complete Freund's adjuvant
injection #1 control group: Freund's complete adjuvant
injection #2 control group: water for injection
injection #3 control group: 50% Freund's complete adjuvant + 50% water for injection

INDUCTION EXPOSURE PATCH
- Day of exposure: 7th day
- Exposure period: 48h
- Site: neck, identical position of the intradermal application
- Concentrations:
test group: 2x4 cm of filter paper nrushed with 25% Ostalanovou BLm in white petroleum in occlusive dressing
control group: 2x4 cm of filter paper of white petroleum in occlusive dressing

B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 2
- Day(s) of challenge: 20th and 27th day
- Exposure period: 72h
- Test groups: 2x2 cm impregnated of test substance with occlusive dressing
- Site: right flank for exposure 1 and left flank for exposure 2
- Concentrations: 0.5% Ostolanova BL in water
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24h
-the site of application was washed with water

OTHER:
Challenge controls:
The same conditions as the experimental group
Positive control substance(s):
not specified

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0.5
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 0.5. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0.5
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 0.5. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: rechallenge. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
rechallenge
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
n.a.
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The sample was tested for skin sensitization potential following OECD 406. Albino guinea-pigs were used as the experimental animals. The test results show that the test substance for guinea pigs, is not a skin contact allergen.
Executive summary:

The sample was tested for skin sensitization potential following OECD 406. Albino guinea-pigs were used as the experimental animals. An intradermal and patch induction were used, and the susbtance was challenged at 20th and rechallnged at 27h day of exposure. The substance was tested at a concentration of 0.5% in water pro-injection with an occlusive dressing and dermal reaction were evaluated after 24h after its removal and after 72h of expoure.

There were no positive skin reactions at the first or repeated induced hypersensitive response. There was no difference in the growth and development of animals between experimental and control groups.

No animal showed any allergenic skin reaction and the substance is not considered as a skin contact allergen.