Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 226-841-5 | CAS number: 5502-88-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- The study was conducted between 19 August 2017 and 28 September 2017 (biological phase).
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The pH in the test medium exceeded the required upper limit also the temperature during the first 49 hours while preparing the stock solution was lower than 30°C. These deviations had no influence on the integrity of the study results.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Deviations:
1. Deviating from the study plan the pH in the test medium exceeded the required upper limit (pH = 9) by 0.6 pH units. This deviation has no influence on the integrity of the study results, This deviation has no influence on the integrity of the study results, since all cell growth related validity criteria were fulfilled and the pH drift throughout all well growing treatment levels were always below 1.4 pH units.
2. Deviating from the study plan the temperature during the first 49 hours while preparing the stock solution was lower than 30°C due to a malfunction of the heating chamber. The mean temperature was 22.6°C. This deviation has no influence on the integrity of the study results, since the analytical measurements of the stock solution at start of the test show comparable high concentration (0.603 mg Menthene,-1,para/L) as observed in previous non-GLP test (up to 0.799 mg Menthene,-1,para/L at 100% of a saturated solution, freshly prepared). - GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 4-isopropyl-1-methylcyclohexene
- EC Number:
- 226-841-5
- EC Name:
- 4-isopropyl-1-methylcyclohexene
- Cas Number:
- 5502-88-5
- Molecular formula:
- C10H18
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-methyl-4-(propan-2-yl)cyclohex-1-ene
- Reference substance name:
- rel-(1R,4R)-1-isopropyl-4-methylcyclohexane
- Cas Number:
- 1678-82-6
- Molecular formula:
- C10H20
- IUPAC Name:
- rel-(1R,4R)-1-isopropyl-4-methylcyclohexane
- Reference substance name:
- rel-(1S,4S)-1-isopropyl-4-methylcyclohexane
- Cas Number:
- 6069-98-3
- Molecular formula:
- C10H20
- IUPAC Name:
- rel-(1S,4S)-1-isopropyl-4-methylcyclohexane
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
impurity 1
impurity 2
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Lot No.: VE00502099
Aspect: colourless to pale yellow liquid
Purity: 87.5% (major peak)
Sampling and analysis
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- Analytical findings
Samples from the test solutions were analysed after 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours to determine actual levels of the test item in solution during the exposure period. The measured concentrations decreased over the exposure period. After 72 hours exposure, the test concentrations remained unstable at between 14–51 % of the time 0 hours measured initial concentration. Therefore, the test item concentration based on initial measured concentration remained unstable within ±20% throughout the exposure period.
Since all concentration levels were measured after 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours, the biological results are calculated and reported based on geometric mean measured concentrations at each concentration level. Details are reported in the analytical phase report and in section 18.3 of the study report.
Biological findings
A weak concentration-response relationship was observed for the biological parameter yield during the exposure period, whereas no meaningful concentration-response relationship was observed for the biological parameter growth rate. The resulting endpoints are presented in Table 1 and Table 2 of the study report, respectively, based on geometric mean measured concentrations and based on nominal concentrations expressed as % of a saturated solution at a loading of 200 mg/L.
The ECx, NOEC and LOEC values for the parameters cell number and biomass expressed in yield and growth rate are based on statistical evaluation of biological results and measured geometric mean concentrations of the test item (Menthene,-1, para).
Test organisms
- Test organisms (species):
- Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (previous names: Raphidocelis subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- The test system used in this study was the freshwater algae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (SAG 61.81).
The organisms were originally supplied by Sammlung von Algenkulturen, Albrecht-von-Haller-Institut, Universität Göttingen, Germany.
Study design
- Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- other: OECD medium (modified) + additional NaHCO3
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
Test conditions
- Test temperature:
- 22.1 to 22.5 °C
- pH:
- 8.2
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Test Concentrations (nominal): 19.8, 29.6, 44.4, 66.7 and 100 % of a saturated solution at a loading rate of 200 mg/L, and a control
Results and discussion
Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- > 0.179 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% confidence limit 0.1103 - 0.4200 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC20
- Effect conc.:
- > 0.179 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 0.179 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 0.179 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- LOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 0.179 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Details on results:
- * Note: The %-inhibition seen for the parameter yield was <20%. Therefore, the EC20 was stated to be higher than the highest tested concentration level (100% of a saturated solution at a loading rate of 200 mg/L).
** Note: The %-inhibition seen for the parameter growth rate was <10%. Therefore, the EC10, EC20 and the E50 was stated to be higher than the highest tested concentration level (100% of a saturated solution at a loading rate of 200 mg/L).
Any other information on results incl. tables
Analytical findings
Samples from the test solutions were analysed after 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours to determine actual levels of the test item in solution during the exposure period. The measured concentrations decreased over the exposure period. After 72 hours exposure, the test concentrations remained unstable at between 14–51 % of the time 0 hours measured initial concentration. Therefore, the test item concentration based on initial measured concentration remained unstable within ±20% throughout the exposure period.
Since all concentration levels were measured after 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours, the biological results are calculated and reported based on geometric mean measured concentrations at each concentration level. Details are reported in the analytical phase report and in section 18.3.
Biological findings
A weak concentration-response relationship was observed for the biological parameter yield during the exposure period, whereas no meaningful concentration-response relationship was observed for the biological parameter growth rate. The resulting endpoints are presented in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively, based on geometric mean measured concentrations and based on nominal concentrations expressed as % of a saturated solution at a loading of 200 mg/L.
The following ECx, NOEC and LOEC values for the parameters cell number and biomass expressed in yield and growth rate are based on statistical evaluation of biological results and measured geometric mean concentrations of the test item (Menthene,-1, para).
Table1: Summary of biological results based on measured test item concentrations in mg Menthene,-1, para/L.
|
Endpoints [mg Menthene,-1, para/L] |
||||
Parameter |
EC10 |
EC20 |
EC50 |
NOEC |
LOEC |
Yield (95% cI) |
0.2152 (0.1103-0.4200) |
> 0.179 |
> 0.179 |
≥0.179 |
> 0.179 |
Growth Rate (95% cI) |
> 0.179 |
> 0.179 |
> 0.179 |
≥0.179 |
> 0.179 |
cl: confidence limit
NOEC, LOEC and ECxvalues for the parameters cell number and biomass expressed in yield and growth rate are based on statistical evaluation of biological results and nominal concentrations in % of a saturated solution at a loading of 200 mg/L were given in the following table.
Table2: Summary of biological results based on nominal concentrations in % of a saturated solution.
|
Endpoints [% of a saturated solution at a loading of 200 mg/L] |
||||
Parameter |
EC10 |
EC20 |
EC50 |
NOEC |
LOEC |
Yield (95% cI) |
52.6 (33.0-83.8) |
> 100 |
> 100 |
≥100 |
> 100 |
Growth Rate (95% cI) |
> 100 |
> 100 |
> 100 |
≥100 |
> 100 |
cl: confidence limit
* Note: The %-inhibition seen for the parameter yield was <20%. Therefore, the EC20was stated to be higher than the highest tested concentration level (100% of a saturated solution at a loading rate of 200 mg/L).
Validity of the test:
All validity criteria were fulfilled as required by the study plan:
Required: |
Found: |
Mean biomass increase in the control cultures:factor of at least 16 within the 72-hour test period |
132.0 |
Mean coefficient of variation for section-by-section specific growth rates in the control cultures:up to 35% |
12.0% |
Coefficient of variation of average specific growth rates during test period in replicate control cultures:up to 7% |
0.7% |
The study is therefore considered to be valid.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Analytical findings
Samples from the test solutions were analysed after 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours to determine actual levels of the test item in solution during the exposure period. The measured concentrations decreased over the exposure period. After 72 hours exposure, the test concentrations was unstable at between 14-51% of the time 0 hours measured initial concentration. Therefore, the test item concentration based on initial measured concentration
did not remain stable within ±20% throughout the exposure period.
Since all concentration levels were measured after 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours, the biological results are calculated and reported based on geometric mean measured concentrations at each concentration level. Details are reported in the analytical phase report and in section 18.3.
Biological findings
A slight concentration-response relationship was observed for the biological parameter yield during the exposure period, whereas no meaningful concentration-response relationship was observed for the biological parameter growth rate. The resulting endpoints are presented in Table 11 and Table 12 of the study report, respectively, based on geometric mean measured concentrations and based on nominal concentrations expressed as % of a saturated solution at a loading of 200 mg/L.
The following ECx, NOEC and LOEC values for the parameters cell number and biomass expressed in yield and growth rate are based on statistical evaluation of biological results and measured geometric mean concentrations of the test item (Menthene,-1, para).
Summary of biological results based on measured test item concentrations in mg Menthene,-1, para/L.
Endpoints [mg Menthene,-1, para/L]
Parameter EC10 E20 EC50 NOEC LOEC
Yield 0.2152 > 0.179* > 0.179* ≥ 0.179 ≥ 0.179
(95% cl) (0.1103-0.4200)
Growth Rate > 0.179** > 0.179** > 0.179** ≥ 0.179 ≥ 0.179
(95% cl)
cl: confidence limit
n.d.: not determined due to mathematical reasons (% inhibition were lower than the effect concentration, e.i. EC10, EC20, EC50)
* Note: The %-inhibition seen for the parameter yield was <20%. Therefore, the EC20 and the EC50 was stated to be higher than the highest tested concentration level (100% of a saturated solution at a loading rate of 200 mg/L).
** Note: The %-inhibition seen for the parameter growth rate was <10%. Therefore, the EC10, EC20 and the EC50 was stated to be higher than the highest tested concentration level (100% of a saturated solution at a loading rate of 200 mg/L).
NOEC, LOEC and ECx values for the parameters cell number and biomass expressed in yield and growth rate are based on statistical evaluation of biological results and nominal concentrations in % of a saturated solution at a loading of 200 mg/L were given in the following table (Table 12 of the study report): Summary of biological results based on nominal concentrations in % of a saturated solution.
Endpoints [% of a saturated solution at a loading of 200 mg/L]
Parameter EC10 EC20 EC50 NOEC LOEC
Yield 52.6 > 100 * > 100* ≥ 100 ≥ 100
(95% cl) (33.0 - 83.8)
Growth Rate > 100 ** > 100 ** > 100 ** ≥ 100 ≥ 100
(95% cl)
cl: confidence limit
* Note: The %-inhibition seen for the parameter yield was <20%. Therefore, the EC20 and the EC50 was stated to be higher than the highest tested concentration level (100% of a saturated solution at a loading rate of 200 mg/L).
** Note: The %-inhibition seen for the parameter growth rate was <10%. Therefore, the EC10, EC20 and the EC50 was stated to be higher than the highest tested concentration level (100% of a saturated solution at a loading rate of 200 mg/L). - Executive summary:
The impact of the test item Menthene,-1, para on the growth of the freshwater green algal species Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was investigated in a 72-hour static test according to the OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, No. 201 (2011).
Based on measured concentrations, the 72h EC50 of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was found to be > 0.179 mg/L. The corresponding NOEC is ≥ 0.179 mg/L.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.