Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 253-087-4 | CAS number: 36528-28-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://chesar.echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_ecotoxicological-information.png)
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 17 - 21 Oct 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 23 Mar 2006
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- The Department of Health of the Government of the United Kingdom, GLP Monitoring Authority (15 Nov 2016)
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Remarks:
- GC-MS
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: All test concentrations and the controls for dilution water (culture medium) and solvent were sampled.
- Sampling method: 100 mL samples were taken from excess test solutions at test start (0 h) and from test vessesl at the test end (72 h). - Vehicle:
- yes
- Remarks:
- tetrahydrofuran (THF)
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: A clear and colorless stock solution with a nominal concentration of 20 g/L was prepared by adding 0.2 g test item to 10 mL tetrahydrofuran. Test solutions were prepared by dilution of this stock solution by the addition of appropriate amounts of stock solution to dilution water.
- Controls: A solvent control was prepared by addition of an appropriate amount of solvent (without test item) to dilution water. The dilution water control consisted of culture medium only.
- Chemical name of vehicle: Tetrahydrofuran (THF)
- Concentration of vehicle in test medium: max 0.01% (v/v) (stock solution: 20 g/L; highest test concentration: 2 mg/L; final test solution volume: 100 mL)
- Evidence of undissolved material: The test solutions were clear and colourless and contained globules of test substance on the surface of the media in 1.0 and 2.0 mg/L. - Test organisms (species):
- Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Unicellular freshwater green microalga
- Strain: CCAP 278/4
- Source: In-house laboratory cultures maintained under axenic conditions.
- Age of inoculum: 4 d
- Method of cultivation: The culture was grown in the same medium and conditions used for the test. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Test temperature:
- 22.2 - 22.7 °C (test incubator)
- pH:
- 0 h: 6.98 (control), 7.11 - 7.29 (treatments)
72 h: 7.55 (control), 7.72 - 8.00 (treatments) - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Culture medium control, solvent control, 0.125, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00, and 2.00 mg/L (nominal)
< LOQ, < LOQ, 0.075, 0.15, 0.27, 0.75, and 1.30 mg/L (mean measured) - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: Conical glass flasks of 250 mL nominal capacity filled with 100 mL test solution and closed with foam bungs
- Initial cell density: 0.526E+04 cells/mL (0.158 mL inoculum)
- Control end cell density: 23.30E+04 cells/mL (culture medium control), 21.38E+04 cells/mL (solvent control)
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
- No. of vessels per vehicle control (replicates): 6
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: Yes, AAP medium
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: AAP medium according to guideline
- Culture medium different from test medium: Culture medium same as test medium
- Intervals of water quality measurement: pH values were measured at 0 h in excess test solution and at 72 h in one replicate test vessel from each test concentration containing algae. The temperature of the test incubator was measured daily. Light intensity was measured once during the study in each of four representative positions.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: Continuous
- Light intensity and quality: cool-white, approximately 6133 lux ± 15%
- Other: The test vessels were placed on an orbital shaker (160 rpm) in the incubator and their positions were randomised daily.
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED:
- Determination of cell concentrations: Electronic particle counter (Coulter counter, between equivalent spherical diameters of 2.3 - 5.0 µm) after 0, 24, 48, and 72 h
- Other: Microscopic observation of cells at the end of the test.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 2
- Range finding study: Yes, non-GLP
- Test concentrations: 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.50, and 1.0 mg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: Yes. The highest test concentration and the solvent were selected based on the results of a non-GLP range-finding test. - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- > 1.3 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1.3 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (arithm. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): Yes
- Observation of abnormalities: No
- Any observations that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: The test solutions were clear and colourless with globules of the item on the surface of the media in 1.0 and 2.0 mg/L.
- Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: Yes - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- One-way analysis of variation and t-test (p < 0.05).
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- For further details please refer to “Any other information on results incl. tables”.
Reference
VALIDITY CRITERIA
The study fulfilled the validity criteria laid down by the guideline (Table 1).
Table 1: Validity criteria for OECD 201.
Criterion from the guideline |
Outcome |
Validity criterion fulfilled |
The biomass in the control cultures should have increased exponentially by a factor of at least 16 within the 72-hour test period. |
Cell density increased by 44.3 and 40.6 over 72 h in the control and solvent control, respectively. |
Yes |
The mean coefficient of variation for section-by-section specific growth rates (days 0-1, 1-2 and 2-3, for 72-hour tests) in the control cultures must not exceed 35% |
The mean coefficient of variation was 25% for the control and 29% for the solvent control. |
Yes |
The coefficient of variation of average specific growth rates during the whole test period in replicate control cultures must not exceed 7% in tests with Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and Desmodesmus subspicatus. |
The coefficient of variation of average specific growth rates was 3.5% for the control and 2.3% for the solvent control. |
Yes |
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Analytical data are summarized in Table 2. Based on the analytical results, the mean measured total concentrations were used for the calculation and reporting of results.
Table 2. Analytical results.
nominal concentration of test item [mg/L] |
measured concentration of test item |
mean measured total concentration [mg/L] |
mean measured total concentration [%] |
|||
culture medium control |
< LOQ |
- |
< LOQ |
- |
0 |
- |
solvent control |
< LOQ |
- |
< LOQ |
- |
0 |
- |
0.125 |
0.15 |
120 |
< LOQ |
0 |
0.075 |
60 |
0.25 |
0.29a |
116 |
< LOQb |
0 |
0.15 |
58 |
0.5 |
0.53 |
106 |
< LOQ |
0 |
0.27 |
53 |
1.0 |
1.5 |
150 |
< LOQ |
0 |
0.75 |
75 |
2.0 |
2.5 |
125 |
0.023 |
1 |
1.3 |
63 |
a triplicate analyses: 0.33, 0.27, and 0.27 mg/L
b duplicate analyses: < LOQ and < LOQ mg/L
LOQ = 0.01 mg/L
BIOLOGICAL RESULTS
No significant differences (p < 0.05) were found and less than 50% growth rate (Table 3) and yield (Table 4) inhibition were found for all tested concentrations. Therefore, the ErC50 (72 h) and EyC50 (72 h) were considered to be greater than the highest tested concentration. The microscopic observations of the control, solvent control and all test concentrations showed that cells appeared normal. The reported effect concentrations are summarized in Table 5.
Table 3. Mean growth rates over the test period.
Nominal concentration of test item [mg/L] |
Mean measured total concentration of test item [mg/L] |
Mean growth rate/day (0-72 hours) |
Mean growth rate/day 95% Cl |
Percentage of solvent control (%) |
Culture medium control |
0 |
1.26 |
1.2 - 1.31 |
102 |
Solvent control |
0 |
1.23 |
1.20 - 1.26 |
- |
0.125 |
0.075 |
1.26 |
1.16 - 1.35 |
102 |
0.25 |
0.15 |
1.25 |
1.13 - 1.38 |
101 |
0.5 |
0.27 |
1.24 |
1.10 - 1.38 |
100 |
1.0 |
0.75 |
1.28 |
1.21 - 1.35 |
104 |
2.0 |
1.3 |
1.30 |
1.29 - 1.31 |
105 |
No significant differences (p <0.05) from the solvent control
All biological measurements are quoted to 3 significant figures and percentages to the nearest integer
Table 4. Mean yields over the test period.
Nominal concentration of test item [mg/L] |
Mean measured total concentration of test item [mg/L] |
Mean yield (0-72 hours) [10^4 cells/ml] |
Percentage of solvent control [%] |
Culture medium control |
0 |
22.8 |
109 |
Solvent control |
0 |
20.9 |
- |
0.125 |
0.075 |
22.3 |
107 |
0.25 |
0.15 |
22.2 |
106 |
0.5 |
0.27 |
21.4 |
102 |
1.0 |
0.75 |
23.9 |
114 |
2.0 |
1.3 |
25.5 |
122 |
No significant differences (p <0.05) from the solvent control
Mean yield values are quoted to 3 significant figures and percentages to the nearest integer.
Table 5. Results based on mean measured total concentrations of the test item.
Growth rate |
test item [mg/L] |
Yield |
test item [mg/L] |
NOEC |
> 1.3 |
NOEC |
> 1.3 |
LOEC |
> 1.3 |
LOEC |
> 1.3 |
ErC50 |
> 1.3 |
EyC50 |
> 1.3 |
ErC10 |
> 1.3 |
EyC10 |
> 1.3 |
Description of key information
ErC10 (72 h) > 1.30 mg/L (arithmetic mean measured, OECD 201, P. subcapitata)
ErC50 (72 h) > 1.30 mg/L (arithmetic mean measured, OECD 201, P. subcapitata)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
There is one experimental study available, in which the toxicity of decyl laurate (CAS 36528-28-6) to aquatic algae was assessed according to OECD guideline 201 and GLP.
In a static test, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was exposed to the five nominal test item concentrations of 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/L for 72 h. Since the test item was poorly soluble, a primary test item stock solution with a nominal concentration of 20 g/L was prepared in the solvent tetrahydrofuran. The final test solutions were prepared by dilution of this stock solution with culture medium. Therefore, solvent and dilution water controls were run in parallel. Test item concentrations in all the test solutions including controls were analytically verified by GC-MS at test start (0 h) and end (72 h) of the test. Algal cell densities were determined by electronic particle counting with a Coulter counter after 0, 24, 48, and 72 h.
The measured test item concentrations were 106 – 120% of the nominal concentrations at the beginning of the test (0 h) and 0 – 1% at the end of the test (72 h), indicating that the test item was not stable for the duration of the test. Effect values were determined and reported on the basis of the mean measured total concentrations, which were 0.075, 0.15, 0.27, 0.75, and 1.3 mg/L (53 – 75% of nominal concentrations). After 72 h, inhibition was less than 50% in both cases and no significant growth rate and yield inhibition was observed. Therefore, the ErC50 (72 h) and EyC50 (72 h) is considered to be greater than the highest concentration tested and is reported as > 1.3 mg/L. The reported NOEC is 1.3 mg/L for growth rate and yield inhibition and the ErC10 (72 h) and EyC10 (72 h) are both > 1.3 mg/L, respectively.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)