Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
The study was conducted between 23 May 2016 and 07 June 2016.
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
The study is considered to be a reliability 1 as it has been conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 405 Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion method and in compliance with GLP.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016
Report date:
2016

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Reaction mass of rel-(2R,3aR,6R,7aR)-2,6-dimethyl-3a-(propan-2-yl)octahydro-1-benzofuran and rel-(2R,3aR,6S,7aR)-2,6-dimethyl-3a-(propan-2-yl)octahydro-1-benzofuran and rel-(2R,3aS,6S,7aS)-2,6-dimethyl-3a-(propan-2-yl)octahydro-1-benzofuran
EC Number:
943-623-1
Molecular formula:
C13 H24 O
IUPAC Name:
Reaction mass of rel-(2R,3aR,6R,7aR)-2,6-dimethyl-3a-(propan-2-yl)octahydro-1-benzofuran and rel-(2R,3aR,6S,7aR)-2,6-dimethyl-3a-(propan-2-yl)octahydro-1-benzofuran and rel-(2R,3aS,6S,7aS)-2,6-dimethyl-3a-(propan-2-yl)octahydro-1-benzofuran
Test material form:
other: liduid
Details on test material:
Identification: IFF 215 (Floriane)
Appearance /physical state: clear colorless liquid
Storage conditions: approximately 4 °C, in the dark

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
Animal Information
Two New Zealand White (Hsdlf:NZW) strain rabbits were supplied by Envigo RMS (UK) Limited, Leicestershire, UK. At the start of the study the animals weighed 2.94 or 4.40 kg and were 12 to 52 weeks old. After an acclimatization period of at least 5 days each animal was given a number unique within the study which was written with a black indelible marker-pen on the inner surface of the ear and on the cage label.

Animal Care and Husbandry
The animals were individually housed in suspended cages. Free access to mains drinking water and food (2930C Teklad Global Rabbit diet supplied by Envigo RMS (UK) Limited, Oxon, UK) was allowed throughout the study. The diet and drinking water were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
The temperature and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 17 to 23 °C and 30 to 70% respectively. The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen changes per hour and the lighting was controlled by a time switch to give 12 hours continuous light and 12 hours darkness.
The animals were provided with environmental enrichment items which were considered not to contain any contaminant of a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent negative control
Amount / concentration applied:
A volume of 0.1 mL of the test item was placed into the conjunctival sac of the right eye.

Duration of treatment / exposure:
72 hours
Observation period (in vivo):
7 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
2 male rabbits
Details on study design:
Study Design
Immediately before the start of the test, both eyes of the provisionally selected test rabbits were examined for evidence of ocular irritation or defect with the aid of a light source from a standard ophthalmoscope. Only animals free of ocular damage were used.
Initially, a single rabbit was treated. A subcutaneous injection of buprenorphine 0.01 mg/kg was administered 60 minutes prior to test item application to provide a therapeutic level of systemic analgesia. Five minutes prior to test item application, a pre-dose anesthesia of ocular anesthetic (two drops of 0.5% tetracaine hydrochloride) was applied to each eye.
A volume of 0.1 mL of the test item was placed into the conjunctival sac of the right eye, formed by gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The upper and lower eyelids were held together for about one second immediately after treatment, to prevent loss of the test item, and then released. The left eye remained untreated and was used for control purposes. Immediately after administration of the test item, an assessment of the initial pain reaction was made according to the six point scale - Initial Pain Reaction, please see "Any other information on materials and methods, inc. tables" for further information.
Eight hours after test item application, a subcutaneous injection of post-dose analgesia, buprenorphine 0.01 mg/kg and meloxicam 0.5 mg/kg, was administered to provide a continued therapeutic level of systemic analgesia. The treated animal was checked for signs of pain and suffering approximately 12 hours later. No further analgesia was required.
After consideration of the ocular responses produced in the first treated animal, a second animal was similarly treated.
Assessment of ocular damage/irritation was made approximately 1 hour and 24, 48 and 72 hours following treatment, according to the numerical evaluation (Draize, J.H, 1977) given below.
Any other ocular effects were also noted. Examination of the eye was facilitated by the use of the light source from a standard ophthalmoscope.
Any clinical signs of toxicity, if present, were also recorded.
An additional observation was made on Day 7 to assess the reversibility of the ocular effects.
Individual body weights were recorded on Day 0 (the day of dosing) and at the end of the observation period.

Draize Scale for Scoring Ocular Irritation
1. CONJUNCTIVAE Score
(A) Redness (refers to palpebral and bulbar conjunctivae excluding cornea and iris)
Vessels normal 0
Vessels definitely injected above normal 1
More diffuse, deeper crimson red, individual vessels not easily discernible 2
Diffuse beefy red 3
(B) Chemosis
No swelling 0
Any swelling above normal (includes nictitating membrane) 1
Obvious swelling with partial eversion of lids 2
Swelling with lids about half closed 3
Swelling with lids half closed to completely closed 4
(C) Discharge
No discharge 0
Any amount different from normal (does not include small amounts observed in inner canthus of normal animals) 1
Discharge with moistening of the lids and hairs just adjacent to lids 2
Discharge with moistening of the lids and hairs a considerable area around the eye 3
THE TOTAL SCORE = (A + B + C) x 2 MAXIMUM TOTAL = 20

2. IRIS
(D) Values
Normal 0
Folds above normal, congestion, swelling, circumcorneal injection (any or all of these or combination of any thereof)
iris still reacting to light (sluggish reaction is positive) 1
No reaction to light, haemorrhage, gross destruction (any or all of these) 2
THE TOTAL SCORE = D x 5 MAXIMUM TOTAL = 10

3. CORNEA
(E) Degree of Opacity (most dense area used)
No opacity 0
Scattered or diffuse areas, details of iris clearly visible 1
Easily discernible translucent areas, details of iris slightly obscured 2
Opalescent areas, no details of iris visible, size of pupil barely discernible 3
Opaque, iris not discernible through the opacity 4
(F) Area of Cornea Involved
One quarter (or less) but not zero 1
Greater than one quarter but less than half 2
Greater than half but less than three quarters 3
Greater than three quarters, up to whole area 4
THE TOTAL SCORE = (E x F) x 5 MAXIMUM TOTAL = 80
MAXIMUM TOTAL SCORE POSSIBLE = 110

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.66
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Ocular Reactions
Please see "Any other information on results, incl. tables" for tabulated data.
No corneal effects were noted during the study.
Iridial inflammation was noted in one treated eye 1 hour after treatment and in the other treated eye at the 24-Hour observation.
Moderate conjunctival irritation was noted in both treated eyes 1 and 24 hours after treatment with minimal conjunctival irritation noted at the 48 and 72-Hour observations.
Both treated eyes appeared normal at the 7-Day observation.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Ocular Reactions

Individual Scores and Individual Total Scores for Ocular Irritation

Rabbit Number and Sex

5464Male

75443 Male

IPR = 0

IPR = 0

Time After Treatment

1 Hour

24 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

7 Days

1 Hour

24 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

7 Days

Cornea

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

E = Degree of Opacity

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

F = Area of Cornea Involved

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Score (E x F) x 5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Iris

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

D

1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

Score (D x 5)

5

0

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

Conjunctivae

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A = Redness

2

2

1

1

0

2

2

1

1

0

B = Chemosis

2

1

1

0

0

2

1

1

1

0

C = Discharge

2

1

1

0

0

2

1

0

0

0

Score (A + B + C) x 2

12

8

6

2

0

12

8

4

4

0

Total Score

17

8

6

2

0

12

13

4

4

0

IPR = Initial pain reaction

Individual Total Scores and Group Mean Scores for Ocular Irritation

Rabbit Number and Sex

Individual Total Scores At:

1 Hour

24 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

7 Days

75464 Male

17

8

6

2

0

75443 Male

12

13

4

4

0

Group Total

29

21

10

6

0

Group Mean Score

14.5

10.5

5.0

3.0

0.0

Body Weight

Both animals showed expected gain in body weight during the study.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test item produced a maximum group mean score of 14.5 and was classified as a mild irritant (Class 4 on a 1 to 8 scale) to the rabbit eye according to a modified Kay and Calandra classification system.
The test item does not meet the criteria for classification according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals or to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, relating to the Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures.
Executive summary:

The eye irritation potential of the test item, IFF 215 (Floriane), was assessed according to OECD Test Guideline 405 using the Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion method. According to the conditions of the test, the test item was considered to be non-irritant to the eye.