Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
June 12, 1990 through July 13, 1990
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1990
Report date:
1990

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Version / remarks:
Guinea Pig Maximisation Test
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
The study was performed in 1990.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
But-2-yne-1,4-diol
EC Number:
203-788-6
EC Name:
But-2-yne-1,4-diol
Cas Number:
110-65-6
Molecular formula:
C4H6O2
IUPAC Name:
but-2-yne-1,4-diol
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Butin-2-diol-1,4
- Analytical purity:99.2 %
- Lot/batch No.: 370294
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
other: GOHI (Himalayan spotted guinea pigs)
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: BRL, Biological Research Laboratories, Füllinsdorf
- Age at study initiation: 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 281 - 379 g
- Housing: Makrolon type-3 cages
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water :ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 1 week


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 3
- Humidity (%): 40 - 70%
- Air changes (per hr): 10-15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
25, 15, 10, 5 %
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
25, 15, 10, 5 %
No. of animals per dose:
10 animals for control group
20 animals for test group

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Results
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25 % test article dilution
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
18
Clinical observations:
positive erythema reaction
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 25 % test article dilution. No with. + reactions: 1.0. Total no. in groups: 18.0. Clinical observations: positive erythema reaction.

Any other information on results incl. tables

SENSITIZING EFFECTS

CONTROL GROUP:

No positive reactions were evident.

TEST GROUP:

Only 1 out of 18 test animals showed incidental positive erythema reactions at the 24-hour reading when treated with a 25% test article dilution. No further positive findings were observed, neither when treated with the vehicle alone nor when treated with the test article diluted to 25 % in physiological saline.

SYMPTOMS, LOCAL

TEST GROUP:

Application area around the injection sites 1 and 3 was found to show erythema, and edema from day 2 to 8; necroses from day 10 to18; encrustation from day 15 to19 and exfoliation from day16 to 25 (on day 9 of test, no observation could be performed because the animals were treated semi-occlusively).

Mortality: animal no. 281 (test group) died spontaneously and female no. 289 (test group) was killed in extremis on test day 3.

- animal no. 281; Lung: discoloration, dark red

- animal no. 289; Lung: discoloration, reddisch

Body weights: The body weight gain of the animals was not affected adversely during the study.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
Classification: not sensitizing