Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

First key event (activation of keratinocytes): Key study. Test method according to the OECD 442D Guideline with GLP. Under the experimental conditions the test item may be classified as not skin sensitizer using the KeratinoSensTM test method. 


Second key event (QSAR prediction): Key study. Read across, executed by AW EC3 from LLNA or Skin sensitisation from GMP assays. Under the predicted conditions the test item may be classified as not skin sensitizer. 

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
results derived from a valid (Q)SAR model and falling into its applicability domain, with adequate and reliable documentation / justification
Justification for type of information:
See attached the Category Report and prediction report
Guideline:
other: REACH Guidance on QSARs R.6
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Read-across, executed by AW 'EC3 from LLNA or Skin sensitisation from GPMT assays'
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SMILES: [Na+].[O-]C(=O)C(F)(F)Cl
Key result
Parameter:
EC3
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation based on QSAR/QSPR prediction
Interpretation of results:
other: Not classified (CLP Regulation EC no. 1272/2008)
Conclusions:
The test substance was predicted to be non skin sensitizer (Read-across, executed by AW 'EC3 from LLNA or Skin sensitisation from GPMT assays').
Executive summary:

The test substance was predicted to be non skin sensitizer (Read-across, executed by AW 'EC3 from LLNA or Skin sensitisation from GPMT assays').

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
From 20-06-2022 to 01-07-2022
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 442D (In Vitro Skin Sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 luciferase KeratinoSens™ test method)
Version / remarks:
25th June, 2018
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
ARE-Nrf2 luciferase KeratinoSens™ test method
Details of test system:
Keratinoses transgenic cell line [442D]
Details on the study design:
REAGENTS AND MEDIA
Repetition 1:
-DMSO (Supplier ref. 41640, Sigma Aldrich; Batch no K0840; purity 99.9%)
-DMEM 1 g/l glucose (Supplier ref. 21885025, Fisher Bioblock; Batch no 248782)
-Non-heat inactivated foetal calf serum (Supplier ref. 10270098, Fisher Bioblock; Batch no 2337973)
-Maintenance medium: DMEM 1 g/l glucose, 9.1% non-heat inactivated foetal calf serum, 0.05% geneticin.
-Seeding medium: DMEM 1 g/l glucose, 9.1% non-heat inactivated foetal calf serum.
-Treatment medium: DMEM 1 g/l glucose, 1% non-heat inactivated foetal calf serum.
-Staining solution: 5 mg/ml MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide) solution in PBS (phosphate buffered saline). Prepared extemporaneously and used within the day.

Repetition 2:
-DMSO (Supplier ref. 41640, Sigma Aldrich; Batch no K0840; purity 99.9%)
-DMEM 1 g/l glucose (Supplier ref. 21885025, Fisher Bioblock; Batch no 2505790)
-Non-heat inactivated foetal calf serum (Supplier ref. 10270098, Fisher Bioblock; Batch no 2337973)
-Maintenance medium: DMEM 1 g/l glucose, 9.1% non-heat inactivated foetal calf serum, 0.05% geneticin.
-Seeding medium: DMEM 1 g/l glucose, 9.1% non-heat inactivated foetal calf serum.
-Treatment medium: DMEM 1 g/l glucose, 1% non-heat inactivated foetal calf serum.
-Staining solution: 5 mg/ml MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-Diphenyltetrazolium Bromide) solution in PBS (phosphate buffered saline). Prepared extemporaneously and used within the day.

TEST SYSTEM
-Cells: KeratinoSens™ (Givaudan)
-Culture: cells were cultured at 37ºC, 5% CO2 in maintenance medium.
-Passage number: cells were used at passage 13 in repetition 1 and passage 15 in repetition 2.

CONTROLS
-Positive control: cinnamaldehyde (CAS 104-55-2; Sigma Aldrich Ref W228613, batch no MKCJ4653; purity 98.6%)
-Negative (solvent) control: DMEM 1 g/l glucose, 1% DMSO, 1% non-heat inactivated foetal calf serum.

CELLS SEEDING.
-Culture plates: 5; 3 white cell culture plates (96 wells) for luminescence reading (induction measurement) + 2 transparent cell culture plates (96 wells) for absorbance reading (cytotoxicity).
-Cells suspension: 125 μl at 8E4 cells/ml in seeding medium were distributed in the culture plates.
-Cell density: 1E4 cells per well.
-Incubation: the seeded plates were incubated 24 hours ± 1 hour at 37ºC, 5% CO2

PREPARATION OF THE TEST ITEM AND CONTROL SUBSTANCES.
Test item stock solution: 200 mM in DMSO
Positive control stock solution: The positive control was prepared at 200 mM in DMSO then diluted to the final concentration of 6.4 mM.

1) 100 X plate: A 100-fold concentrated dilutions series was prepared in 96-well plate:
-Test item: The test item was placed in one of the rows B to F. 100 μl of DMSO were distributed from columns 1 to 11. 200 μl of the 200 mM stock solution were placed in column 12 then the series dilutions were prepared by transferring 100 μl from column 12 to column 11 and so on until the column 1. Dilutions were mixed by repeated pipetting, at least 3 times, between each concentration.
-Positive control: 100 μl of DMSO were distributed in row G from columns 7 to 10. 200 μl of the 6.4 mM stock solution were placed in column 11 then the series dilutions were prepared by transferring
100 μl of the column 11 in the column 10 and so on until the column 7. Dilutions were mixed by repeated pipetting, at least 3 times, between each concentration.
-Negative control: 100 μl of DMSO were distributed in row G columns 1 to 6 and 12 and in the well H12.

2) 4X dilution plate: The 100 X plate was diluted 25 fold in a new plate (4 X) in treatment medium.

APPLICATION OF THE TEST ITEM AND CONTROL SUBSTANCES
In the 5 seeded plates, the medium was aspirated and replaced with 150 μl of treatment medium. Then the 4 X plate was replicated 5 times: 50 μl from the 4 X plate were placed in each of the three white plates and in the two transparent plates. The plates (1 X) were covered with an adhesive plastic foil to prevent evaporation and incubated for 48 hours ± 1 hour (37ºC, 5% CO2).

CONCENTRATIONS TESTED
-Test item: 12 concentrations according to a geometric progression of ratio 2 from 0.98 μM to 2000μM.
-Positive control: 5 concentrations according to a geometric progression of ratio 2 from 4 to 64 μM.

REPLICATES: The study was composed of two independent repetitions. For each repetition the test item and the reference items were replicated on three independent plates for the measurement of
induction and two plates for the measurement of cytotoxicity. Each repetition was performed on a different day with fresh stock solution.

LUCIFERASE ACTIVITY.
-Apparatus: Luminometer: GloMax™ (Promega)
-Validity of luminometer: a quality control analysis was performed according to the procedure described in Annex 3 of the OECD guideline 442D .
-Luciferase substrate: luciferine + ATP + lysing agent. Bright Glo™ Luciferase Assay System (Promega).
-Procedure: After 48 hours, the medium was aspirated and each well was gently washed once with 200 μl of PBS. Then 100 μl of luciferase substrate were then added in each well. The plates were incubated at least 15 minutes at room temperature to ensure cells lysis. The plates were placed in the luminometer then the luciferase activity was measured with an integration time of 2 seconds.

CITOTOXICITY ASSESSMENT.
-Apparatus: MULTISKAN EX plate reader (Thermo life sciences) - reading range 0 - 3.5 units of Absorbance -linearity range 0 - 2.200 units of Absorbance.
-Procedure: After 48 hours, the medium was aspirated and each well was gently washed once with 200 μl of PBS. Then, 225 μl of staining solution diluted at 0.6 mg/ml in treatment medium (from the
5mg/ml stock solution) were distributed in each well. The plates were covered with an adhesive plastic foil and incubated for 4 hours ± 30 minutes (37ºC, 5% CO2). After this contact time, the
staining solution was eliminated and the cells were treated with 200 μl of 10% SDS (sodium dodecylsulfate) one night in the dark (37°C, 5% CO2). After a 10 minutes homogenization, the absorbance
was measured at 540 nm.

DEVIATIONS FROM OECD GUIDELINE: No.
Negative control:
other: Treatment culture medium, 1% DMSO, 1% Non-heat inactivated foetal calf serum
Positive control:
cinnamic aldehyde [442D]
Positive control results:
Repetition 1: The maximal average induction of luciferase activity (Imax) was 2.07 at a concentration of 64 μM. The mean value EC1.5 was 17.24 μM.
Repetition 2: The maximal average induction of luciferase activity (Imax) was 3.37 at a concentration of 64 μM. The mean value EC1.5 was 7.82 μM.
Key result
Group:
test chemical
Run / experiment:
run/experiment 1
Parameter:
Imax [442D]
Value:
0.98
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: Imax is lower than 1.5, thus the EC1.5 was not determined.
Key result
Run / experiment:
run/experiment 2
Parameter:
Imax [442D]
Value:
1.18
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: Imax is lower than 1.5, thus the EC1.5 was not determined.
Other effects / acceptance of results:
- Visible damage on test system: No.

DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY: yes, the 10 proficiency substances recommended in the OECD guideline 442D were performed, obtaining values that fall within the respective reference range for at least 8 out of the 10.

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes, the CV of the luminescence readings for repetition 1 was 12.0% and for repetition 2 was 11.8% which are not higher than 20%.
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: Yes, the luciferase activity induction was statistically significant above the threshold of 1.5 in at least one dose tested for each repetition. The average induction values at 64 μM were 2.07 and 3.37 in each repetition which are between 2 and 8. The E C1.5 values were 17.24 and 7.82 μM for each repetition which are within 2 SD of the historical mean of the testing facility and between 7 μM and 30 μM based on the OECD validation dataset.

Table 1. Reference items 


 













































Cinnamaldeyde4 μM8 μM16 μM32 μM64 μMEC1.5Imax
Rep 11.171.251.481.702.0717.242.07
Rep 21.291.511.702.063.377.823.37
Mean1.231.381.591.882.7211*2.72

*geometric mean 

















Solvent controlCV % solvent control
Rep 112.0
Rep 211.8

Table 2. Test item summary results 

















































ID-22/09448VIABILITYINDUCTION
IC50μMIC30μMImaxLinear EC1.5 μMLinear EC1.5 μM/LogμM
Rep 1>2000>20000.98--
Rep 2>2000>20001.18--
Mean--1.08--
Geometric mean>2000>2000---

Table 3. Test item mean viability percentage 

































































Concentration μM 0.981.953.917.8115.6331.2562.512525050010002000
Rep 1113.06121.04111.2098.98103.9598.6799.81108.61110.99122.07121.35114.93
Rep 287.1491.7887.1481.3277.0776.1878.3677.1786.7488.1396.81104.80
Viability100.1106.499.290.190.587.489.192.998.9105.1109.1109.9

Table 4. Test item induction 
















































































Concentration μM0.981.953.917.8115.6331.2562.512525050010002000
Rep 10.950.960.910.940.930.950.960.980.910.910.920.83
Rep 21.061.031.001.071.061.041.141.181.151.071.071.01
Induction1.010.990.961.001.000.991.051.081.030.991.000.92
SD0.080.050.060.090.090.070.120.140.170.120.110.13

 

Interpretation of results:
other: KeratinoSensTM test result is considered as part of an integrated approach to testing and ass essment (IATA) in accordance with OECD guideline 442D.
Conclusions:
Under the experimental conditions the test item may be classified as not skin sensitizer using the KeratinoSensTM test method.
Executive summary:

The KeratinoSensTM test method was performed for the test item as part of an integrated approach to testing and assessment (IATA) in accordance to OECD guideline 442D, under GLP conditions. A KeratinoSensTM cell culture was prepared, incubated for 24 hours ± 1 hour at 37ºC, 5% CO2 and distributed into 3 plates (96 wells) for the measurement of the induction of luciferase activity and 2 plates (96 wells) to assess the cytotoxicity. Test item at 12 concentrations from 0.98 μM to 2000 μM, positive control cinnamaldehyde at 5 concentrations from 4 to 64 μM and negative control 1% DMSO were placed in the seeded plates and incubated for 48 hours ± 1 hour at 37ºC, 5% CO2. 2 repetitions were performed on a different day with fresh stock solution. All validity criteria were fulfilled. In the first repetition the induction was lower than 1.5 and thus the EC1.5 was not determined. In the second repetition the induction was lower tan 1.5 at the concentration 2000 μM b. The induction factor was less than 1.5 for all concentrations given more 70% viability and thus the EC1.5 was not determined either in agreement with the acceptance criteria. Bases on these findings, a negative result can be predicted for skin sensitization using the KeratinoSensTM test method.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available data, the substance is not classified as not sensitising according to CLP Regulation no. 1272/2008.