Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Bulk calcium carbonate is not considered to be irritating to the skin or eyes.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2 June 2004 to 5 June 2004
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Bulk calcium carbonate
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Source: David Percival Ltd, Moston, Sandbach, Cheshire UK.
- Weight: 2.0 to 3.5 kg
- Age: 12 - 20 weeks old.
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
- Housing: the animals were individually housed in suspended metal cages
Free access to mains drinking water and food (Certified Rabbit Diet code 5322) allowed throughout the study.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17-23 °C
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Air changes (per hr): at least 15 changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours continuous light and 12 hours darkness
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
water
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
0.5 g of test material moistened with 0.5 mL of distilled water
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 hours
Observation period:
1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after removal of the patches
Number of animals:
3 male animals
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: Dorsal/ flank - 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm area
- % coverage: No data
- Type of wrap if used: The cotton gauze patch was secured in position with a strip of adhesive tape and the trunk of each rabbit was then wrapped in an elasticated corset.


REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Any residual test material was removed by gentle swabbing with cotton wool soaked in distilled water.
- Time after start of exposure: 4 hours


SCORING SYSTEM: Draize
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
other: Mean scores for all animals
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Remarks on result:
other: Mean scores calculated according to the criteria described in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
other: Mean scores for all animals
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Remarks on result:
other: Mean scores calculated according to the criteria described in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No evidence of skin irritation was noted during the study.
Other effects:
No data

Table 1: Individual Skin Reactions

Skin reaction

Observation Time

Individual scores – Rabbit Number and Sex

Total

29 Male

30 Male

31 Male

Erytheme/Eschar Formation

1 hour

24 hours

48 hours

72 hours

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

( 0 )

0

( 0 )

0

Oedema Formation

1 hour

24 hours

48 hours

72 hours

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

( 0 )

0

( 0 )

0

Classification:                                          NON-IRRITANT

No evidence of skin irritation was noted during the study

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
No evidence of skin irritation or corrosive effects were noted during the study. All the indivdual scores were 0; hence, the mean scores for 24, 48 and 72 hours for each animal were also 0. PCC is therefore non-irritating to rabbit skin and does not require classification according to the criteria described in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
14 June 2004 to 24 June 2004
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Source: David Percival Ltd, Moston, Sandbach, Cheshire UK.
- Weight: 2.0 to 3.5 kg
- Age: 12 - 20 weeks old.
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
- Housing: the animals were individually housed in suspended metal cages
Free access to mains drinking water and food (Certified Rabbit Diet code 5322) allowed throughout the study.

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17-23 °C
- Humidity (%): 30-70%
- Air changes (per hr): at least 15 changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours continuous light and 12 hours darkness
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: Left eye served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
0.1 mL of the test material (~61 mg)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Animals were exposed to the test material for up to 72 hours.
Observation period (in vivo):
1, 24, 48 and 72 hours
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3 male animals
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
Not specified


SCORING SYSTEM: Assessment of ocular damage/ irritation was made according to Draize. Ocular irritancy potential of the test material was determined using a modified version of the system described by Kay and Calandra.


TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: light source from a standard ophthalmoscope
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
other: Mean scores for all animals
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
0
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Remarks on result:
other: Mean scores calculated according to the criteria described in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
other: Mean scores for all animals
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
0
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Remarks on result:
other: Mean scores calculated according to the criteria described in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
other: Mean scores for all animals
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
0.67
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: Mean scores calculated according to the criteria described in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
other: Mean scores for all animals
Time point:
other: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Score:
0
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Remarks on result:
other: Mean scores calculated according to the criteria described in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008
Irritant / corrosive response data:
No corneal effects were noted during the study.
Iridial inflammation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment.
Minimal conjunctival irritation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment and at the 24 and 48 hour observations.
All treated eyes appeared normal at the 72 hour observation.
Other effects:
The initial pain reaction was grade 2 (rabbit blinks and tries to open eye but reflex closes it, slight initial pain).

Table 1: Individual scores and individual total scores for ocular irritation

Rabbit number and sex

83 Male

(IPR = 2)

26 Male

(IPR = 2)

27 Male

(IPR = 2)

Time after treatment

1 h

24 h

48 h

72 h

1 h

24 h

48 h

72 h

1 h

24 h

48 h

72 h

CORNEA

E= degree of opacity

F=area of cornea involved

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

0

IRIS

D

 

1

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

1

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

1

 

0

 

0

 

0

CONJUNCTIVAE

A=Redness

B=Chemosis

C=Discharge

 

1

1

1

 

1

0

1

 

1

0

0

 

0

0

0

 

1

1

1

 

1

0

1

 

1

0

0

 

0

0

0

 

1

1

1

 

1

0

1

 

1

0

0

 

0

0

0

IPR = Initial Pain Reaction

Table 2: Mean Scores for Ocular Irritation

Skin Reaction

Mean scores for 24, 48 and 72 hours

 -

83 Male

26 Male

27 Male

Cornea

0

0

0

Iris

0

0

0

Conjunctivae - redness

2/3 = 0.67

2/3 = 0.67

2/3 = 0.67

Conjunctivae – chemosis

0

0

0

No corneal effects were noted during the study.

Iridial inflammation was noted in all treated eyes on hour after treatment.

Minimal conjunctival irritation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment and at the 24 and 48 -hour observations.

All treated eyes appeared normal at the 72 hour observation.

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
There were no corneal or iridial effects or chemosis noted during the study after 24 hours of exposure; hence, the mean scores for 24, 48 and 72 hours for each animal were 0. The mean scores for 24, 48 and 72 hours for each animal for conjunctivae redness, although above 0, were below the limits for classification as irritating to eyes (Category 2) and the effects were fully reversible within an observation period of 21 days. PCC is therefore non-irritating to eyes and does not require classification according to the criteria described in Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Skin irritation:

In a reliable GLP OECD guideline 404 in vivo skin irritation study (Sanders, 2004), 0.5 g bulk calcium carbonate was applied to the shaved skin of 3 New Zealand White rabbits under a semiocclusive patch for 4 hours. Animals were observed after removal of the patch at 1, 24, 48 and 72 h. The average of the erythema and edema assessments for the 3 animals after 72 h was 0.0. Therefore, calcium carbonate was found to be non-irritating to the skin in rabbits.

Eye irritation:

In a reliable GLP OECD guideline 405 in vivo eye irritation study (Sanders, 2004), ~100 mg bulk calcium carbonate was instilled into the eyes of 3 New Zealand White rabbits. Ocular observations were made at 1, 24, 48 and 72 h after instillation.

There were no corneal or iridial effects or chemosis noted during the study after 24 hours of exposure; hence, the mean scores for 24, 48 and 72 hours for each animal were 0. The mean scores for 24, 48 and 72 hours for each animal for conjunctivae redness, although above 0, were below the limits for classification as irritating to eyes (Category 2) and the effects were fully reversible within an observation period of 21 days.

From the results of this study, bulk calcium carbonate does not need to be classified as irritating to the eyes.


Justification for classification or non-classification

In the in vivo skin and eye irritation studies bulk calcium carbonate was non-irritant and therefore requires no classification under CLP.