Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Remarks:
Local Lymph Node Assay in the Mouse with Acesulfame Potassium
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2012-Jul-12 through 2012-Sep-25
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2012
Report date:
2012

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
6-methyl-1,2,3-oxathiazine-4(3-H)-one-2,2-dioxide potassium salt
IUPAC Name:
6-methyl-1,2,3-oxathiazine-4(3-H)-one-2,2-dioxide potassium salt
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
6-methyl-1,2,3-oxathiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide, potassium salt
EC Number:
259-715-3
EC Name:
6-methyl-1,2,3-oxathiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide, potassium salt
Cas Number:
55589-62-3
Molecular formula:
C4H5NO4S.K
IUPAC Name:
potassium 6-methyl-2,2,4-trioxo-3,4-dihydro-1,2λ⁶,3-oxathiazin-3-ide
Constituent 3
Reference substance name:
Acesulfame potassium
IUPAC Name:
Acesulfame potassium
Test material form:
solid: crystalline
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Acesulfame potassium
- Physical state: White, crystalline powder
- Analytical purity:100%
- Lot/batch No.: 0000522972
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 08 October 2012
- Stability under test conditions: stable
- Storage condition of test material: Controlled Room temperature (15-25 °C, below 70 RH%), protected from humidity

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: ELEVAGE JANVIER; Route des Chènes Secs B.P. 4105; 53940 LE GENEST-ST-ISLE, France
- Age at study initiation: 10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 20.7 - 22.8 g
- Housing: group caging
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 20 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3 °C
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): 15 - 20
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light) 12 h/12h

IN-LIFE DATES:
From: 19-Sep-2012
To: 25-Sep-2012

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
dimethyl sulphoxide
Concentration:
5%, 10%, 25% (w/v)
No. of animals per dose:
4
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:
- Compound solubility: soluble at 25% (w/v)
- Irritation: none at 25% (w/v)


MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT
- Name of test method:
- Criteria used to consider a positive response: the DPN value of the negative (vehicle) control group falls within the range of historical laboratory control data, the positive control substance produces a significant lympho-proliferative response increases (SI>3), each treated and control group includes at least 4 animals, the test item did not cause serious systemic or local toxicity.

TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
Groups of four female CBA/J Rj mice were treated with: 25, 10 and 5% (w/v), respectively Acesulfame Potassium in DMSO. The negative control group received DMSO and the positive control group received 25 % -Hexylcinnamaldehyde (HCA) in DMSO.
The solutions of the test item were applied on the dorsal surface of ears of experimental animals (25 µl/ear) for three consecutive days (Days 1, 2 and 3). There was no treatment on Days 4, 5 and 6. On Day 6, the cell proliferation in the local lymph nodes was measured by incorporation of tritiated methyl thymidine (3HTdR) and the values obtained were used to calculate stimulation indices (SI).
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
Statistics:
Not applicable

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
α-Hexylcinnamaldehyde (25% (w/v) dissolved in DMSO) was used as a positive control to demonstrate the appropriate performance of the assay [1]. A significant lymphoproliferative response (stimulation index value of 15.7) was noted for the positive control chemical and this result confirmed the validity of the assay.

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Parameter:
SI
Remarks on result:
other: Stimulation index values of the test item were 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5 at treatment concentrations of 25, 10 and 5% (w/v), respectively.
Parameter:
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: DPM/group were were 1061, 1195 and 1275 at treatment concentrations of 25, 10 and 5% (w/v), respectively.
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.3
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.4
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.5

Any other information on results incl. tables

Body Weights

 

Animal

Test Group

Initial Body

Terminal Body

Change#

Number

Name

Weight (g)

Weight (g)*

(%)

424

 

22.8

22.7

-0.4

456

Negative control

21.8

23.8

9.2

478

DMSO

21.7

21.7

0.0

481

 

21.0

22.5

7.1

 

Mean

21.8

22.7

3.9

427

 

22.3

23.4

4.9

451

Acesulfame Potassium

21.8

21.7

-0.5

460

25% (w/v) in DMSO

21.2

23.0

8.5

462

 

21.4

21.0

-1.9

 

Mean

21.7

22.3

2.8

449

 

22.7

22.7

0.0

474

Acesulfame Potassium

20.7

20.5

-1.0

468

10% (w/v) in DMSO

21.4

23.1

7.9

452

 

21.3

20.5

-3.8

 

Mean

21.5

21.7

0.8

466

 

22.0

22.7

3.2

454

Acesulfame Potassium

22.4

22.9

2.2

470

5% (w/v) in DMSO

21.0

21.9

4.3

480

 

20.9

21.8

4.3

 

Mean

21.6

22.3

3.5

477

 

22.4

21.5

-4.0

484

Positive control

21.5

21.7

0.9

455

25 % HCA in DMSO

21.4

23.9

11.7

469

 

20.8

22.4

7.7

 

Mean

21.5

22.4

4.1

*: Terminal body weights were measured on Day 6.

#: (Terminal Body Weight – Initial Body Weight) / Initial Body Weight x 100

 

 

Desintegration per minute (DPM), desintegration per node (DPN) and Stimulation Index Values for all Groups:

Test Group

Measured

Group

No. of

DPN

Stimulation

Name

DPM/group

DPM

Nodes

 

Index Values

Background

 

 

 

 

 

(5 (w/v) % TCA )

37

 

-

 

 

Negative control

 

 

 

 

 

DMSO

850

813

8

101.6

1.0

Acesulfame Potassium

 

 

 

 

 

25% (w/v) in DMSO

1061

1024

8

128.0

1.3

Acesulfame Potassium

 

 

 

 

 

10% (w/v) in DMSO

1195

1158

8

144.8

1.4

Acesulfame Potassium

 

 

 

 

 

5% (w/v) in DMSO

1275

1238

8

154.8

1.5

Positive control

 

 

 

 

 

25 % HCA in DMSO

12789

12752

8

1594.0

15.7

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Acesulfame potassium tested in dimethyl sulphoxide as vehicle, was shown to have no sensitization potential in the Local Lymph Node Assay in female CBA/J Rj mice .

According to the UN Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals, Acesulfame Potassium does not require classification as a skin sensitiser.
Executive summary:

The potential of Acesulfame potassium to induce skin sensitization was investigated in groups of four female CBA/J Rj mice treated with: 25, 10 and 5% (w/v) in DMSO. The negative control group received DMSO and the positive control group received 25 %a-Hexylcinnamaldehyde (HCA) in DMSO.

The solutions of the test item were applied on the dorsal surface of ears of experimental animals (25 µl/ear) for three consecutive days (Days 1, 2 and 3). There was no treatment on Days 4, 5 and 6. On Day 6, the cell proliferation in the local lymph nodes was measured by incorporation of tritiated methyl thymidine (3HTdR) and the values obtained were used to calculate stimulation indices (SI).

No mortality or sign of systemic toxicity or local irritation were observed during the study. No treatment body weight loss was observed during the study.

Stimulation index values of the test item were 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5 at treatment concentrations of 25, 10 and 5% (w/v), respectively.

The positive control demonstrated the appropriate performance of the assay as a significant lymphoproliferative response (stimulation index value of 15.7) was noted.

Conclusion

Acesulfame Potassium tested for its sensitizing potential according to OECD 429 under GLP conditions was shown to have no sensitization potential in the murine Local Lymph Node Assay.

The study result triggers the following classification/labelling:

EU Directive 1999/45/EC (as amended):        none

Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP):           none

GHS (rev. 4) 2011:                                      unclassified