Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

Weight of evidence:

1.- Experimental result from a publication. The mutagenic potency of the analgetic bucetin was investigated according to the method of Ames et al., with and without metabolic activation. Since p-phenetidine has been reported in a HPLC study to be a metabolite of bucetin, its mutagenicity has also been studied. The test substance was positive for mutagenic effects in cultures with metabolic activation and negative without metabolic activation.

2.- Experimental result from a publication, according to modified Ames gradient plate test. Salmonella typhimurium G46, TA1535, TA100, C3076, TA1537, D3052, TA1538, and TA98 and Escherichia coli WP2 and WP2uvrA-, with and without metabolic activation. It is concluded that p-phenetidine was not mutagenic in the bacterial mutation assay.

3.- Experimental result from a publication, according to OECD guideline 471. Salmonella typhimurium TA 100, TA98, TA97, TA 102, with and without metabolic activation. Positive controls were used. Phenetidine resulted to be not mutagenic.

4.- Experimental result from a publication, according to OECD guideline 471. Salmonella typhimutium TA98 and TA100, with and without metabolic activation. It is concluded that phenetidine was mutagenic.

5.- Experimental result from a publication, according to OECD guideline 471. Salmonella typhimurium TA 98, wit metabolic activation. It is concluded that p-phenetidine is not mutagenic, and quercetin does not alter the mutagenicity of this compound.


Short description of key information:
Genetic toxicity in vitro: Weight of evidence: results from different independent sources. Some of them leading to the conclusion that the substance is mutagenic.

The substance is included in Table 3 of Annex VI of CLP Regulation (harmonised classification and labelling) and classified as:
Germ cell mutagenicity Category 2.

Endpoint Conclusion:

Justification for classification or non-classification

The substance is included in Table 3 of Annex VI of CLP Regulation (harmonised classification and labelling) and classified as:

Germ cell mutagenicity Category 2.