Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 271-729-1 | CAS number: 68606-18-8
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 30 Jun - 04 Jul 1988
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP-guideline study with acceptable restrictions. Purity of test substance not given.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 988
- Report date:
- 1988
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPP 81-4 (Acute Eye Irritation)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- purity of test substance not given
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- purity of test substance not given
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Glycerides, C12-18
- EC Number:
- 266-944-2
- EC Name:
- Glycerides, C12-18
- Cas Number:
- 67701-26-2
- IUPAC Name:
- 67701-26-2
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): [trade name] C10-18 TRIGLYCERIDE
- Physical state: white, waxy solid
- Analytical purity: no data
- Stability under test conditions: not determined
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature
- Date of arriva:l 23 March 1988
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: David Percival Ltd., Cheshire, UK
- Age at study initiation: 12-16 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.52-2.99 kg
- Housing: individually in suspended metal cages
- Diet: Rabbit Diet (Preston Farmers Ltd., Lincolnshire, UK), ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 16-19
- Humidity (%): 60-75
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: not required, the untreated eye served as control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL (= 97 mg)
The material was warmed until molten and instilled in the eye in the form of a paste. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single instillation without rinsing
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 72 h
Reading time points: 1, 24, 48 and 72 h - Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 5 males, 1 female
- Details on study design:
- SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: hand-slit lamp
Results and discussion
In vivo
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- out of all 6 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- out of all 6 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- out of all 6 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No corneal opacity, iritis or chemosis were observed in any animal at any reading time point.
1 h post-instillation: slight or moderate conjunctval redness was observed in 2/6 and 4/6 animals respectively. Slight or moderate chemosis was observed in 4/6 and 1/6 animals, respectively. Slight discharge was observed in 4/6 animals.
24 h post-instillation: slight conjunctival redness was observed in 2/6 animals, the effect being fully reversible within the following 24 h.
48-72 h post-instillation: no conjunctival redness was observed in any animal. - Other effects:
- No further local or systemic effects were reported.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
