Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information
Ames: The test substance was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test.
Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2005-02-23 to 2005-04-10
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP and guideline compliant study.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
Version / remarks:
METI, MHLW and MAFF
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Target gene:
Base-pair substitution type: Salmonella typhimurium strains (uvrB-) TA1535, TA100 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA- excision repair gene (uvrA-)
Frameshift type: Salmonella typhimurium strains (uvrB-) TA1537 and TA98
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: amino-acid requirement, presence of rfa mutation (excision repair and deep rough mutation), R factors, uvrB or uvrA mutation
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 mix induced with phenobarbitone/β-naphthoflavone
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Preliminary toxicity assay: 0, 0.15, 0.5,1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate.
Experiment I (Range-finding Test)+ Experiment II (Main Test): 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test material was immiscible in distilled water but was fully miscible in dimethyl sulphoxide at 50 mg/mL in solubility checks performed. Dimethyl sulphoxide was therefore selected as the vehicle of choice.
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
Remarks:
Without S9 mix: 2 µg/plateWP2uvrA-, 3 µg/plateTA100, 5 µg/plateTA1535
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
Remarks:
Without S9 mix: 80 µg/plate TA1537
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
Remarks:
Without S9 mix: 0.2 µg/plate TA98
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 2-Aminoanthracene
Remarks:
With S9 mix: 1 µg/plate TA100, 2 µg/plate TA1535, TA1537,10 µg/plate WP2uvrA-
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
benzo(a)pyrene
Remarks:
With S9 mix: 5 µg/plate TA98
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: In agar (plate incorporation)

DURATION
- Preincubation period: 48 hours at 37 °C

SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays):

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Repeated in triplicate for each bacterial strain and for each concentration of test material both with and without S9-mix.

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 1 to 9.9 x 10E9 bacteria per mL

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Domino colony counter- growth of the bacterial background lawn

OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: No data
- Determination of endoreplication: No data
- checked for characteristics, viability and spontaneous reversion rate
Evaluation criteria:
The reverse mutation assay may be considered valid if the following criteria are met:
- All tester strain cultures exhibit a characteristic number of spontaneous revertants per plate in the vehicle and untreated controls. Acceptable ranges are presented in the standard test method with historical control ranges.
- The appropriate characteristics for each tester strain have been confirmed, e.g. rfa cell-wall mutation and pKM101 plasmid R-factor etc.
- All tester strain cultures should be in the approximate range of 1 to 9.9 x 10E9 bacteria per mL.
- Each mean positive control value should be at least twice the respective vehicle control value for each strain, thus demonstrating both the intrinsic sensitivity of the tester strains to mutagenic exposure and the integrity of the S9-mix.
- There should be a minimum of four non-toxic test material dose levels.
- There should not be an excessive loss of plates due to contamination.

The test material may be considered positive in this test system if the following criteria are met:
- The test material should have induced a reproducible, dose-related and statistically (Dunnett's method of linear regression) significant increase in the revertant count in at least one strain of bacteria.
Statistics:
Dunnett's method of linear regression
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

The test substance was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test.
Executive summary:

The study was designed to conform to the guidelines for bacterial mutagenicity testing published by the major Japanese Regulatory Authorities including METI, MHLW and MAFF. It also meets the requirements of the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No. 471 "Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test", EU Method B13/14 of Commission Directive 2000/32/EC and the USA, EPA (TSCA) OPPTS harmonised guidelines.

Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA- were treated with the test material using the Ames plate incorporation method at five dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolising system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for the range-finding test was determined in a preliminary toxicity assay and was 50 to 5000 µg/plate. The main experiment was conducted on a separate day using the same dose range as the range-finding test, fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test material formulations.The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. The test material caused no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn at any dose level although several tester strains exhibited reductions in revertant colony frequency at 5000 µg/plate. The test material was, therefore, tested up to the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 µg/plate. No test material precipitate was observed on the plates at any of the doses tested in either the presence or absence of S9-mix. No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test material, either with or without metabolic activation. Therefore the test substance was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Additional information

Additional information from genetic toxicity in vitro:

Bacterial reverse toxicity test

The study was designed to conform to the guidelines for bacterial mutagenicity testing published by the major Japanese Regulatory Authorities including METI, MHLW and MAFF. It also meets the requirements of the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No. 471 "Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test", EU Method B13/14 of Commission Directive 2000/32/EC and the USA, EPA (TSCA) OPPTS harmonised guidelines.

Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA98 and TA100 and Escherichia coli strain WP2uvrA- were treated with the test material using the Ames plate incorporation method at five dose levels, in triplicate, both with and without the addition of a rat liver homogenate metabolising system (10% liver S9 in standard co-factors). The dose range for the range-finding test was determined in a preliminary toxicity assay and was 50 to 5000 µg/plate. The main experiment was conducted on a separate day using the same dose range as the range-finding test, fresh cultures of the bacterial strains and fresh test material formulations. The vehicle (dimethyl sulphoxide) control plates gave counts of revertant colonies within the normal range. All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation. Thus, the sensitivity of the assay and the efficacy of the S9-mix were validated. The test material caused no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn at any dose level although several tester strains exhibited reductions in revertant colony frequency at 5000 µg/plate. The test material was, therefore, tested up to the maximum recommended dose level of 5000 µg/plate. No test material precipitate was observed on the plates at any of the doses tested in either the presence or absence of S9-mix. No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test material, either with or without metabolic activation. Therefore the test substance was considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test.


Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
GLP and guideline compliant study.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the result of the bacterial reverse toxicity test to the test substance, classification is not warranted according to the criteria of Directive 67/548/EEC (DSD) and Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP).