Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: other routes

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: other routes
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
not reported
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The data are taken from an abstract of an internet source with no reported methodology. As a result it is not possible to assess the accuracy of the information. Furthermore, the route of exposure was administered via a non standard route.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
secondary source
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1980

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
The value is taken from a secondary source citing Robinson (1969). Test guidelines or methods are not mentioned in the literature.
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Dioctyltin dilaurate
EC Number:
222-883-3
EC Name:
Dioctyltin dilaurate
Cas Number:
3648-18-8
Molecular formula:
C40-H80-O4-Sn
IUPAC Name:
dioctyltin dilaurate

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
female

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
intraperitoneal
Vehicle:
not specified

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
800 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The LD50 via intraperitoneal injection is recorded as 800 mg/kg.
Executive summary:

The test material was reported to have an LD₅₀ 800 mg/kg following administration via intraperitoneal injection to rats. There is no information included in the literature regarding the method used by Robinson (1969). It is not possible to derive a classification from this value as a nonstandard route of exposure was used.