Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
November 1979
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study was conducted according to a protocol which was equivalent to current guideline but not compliant with GLP.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1979
Report date:
1979

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: HLE protocol number P520/22/6/-/553/Rev.1
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
EDTMP-xCaxNa
IUPAC Name:
EDTMP-xCaxNa
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
[ethylenebis[nitrilobis(methylene)]]tetrakisphosphonic acid, calcium sodium salt
EC Number:
287-370-9
EC Name:
[ethylenebis[nitrilobis(methylene)]]tetrakisphosphonic acid, calcium sodium salt
Cas Number:
85480-89-3
Molecular formula:
C6H20-2x-yN2O12P4.xCa.yNa
IUPAC Name:
x calcium y sodium {ethane-1,2-diylbis[nitrilobis(methylene)]}tetrakis(phosphonate)
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report):
- Physical state: white powder
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature
- -EDTMP-xCa.xNa 26%, NaCl 12%, and water 62%. Phosphonate content ca. 92%.

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: > 2kg
- Housing: Caged individually in grid floor cages in a single room with fan controlled air circulation.
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: minimum of 3 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): lower limit of 14
- Humidity (%): not controlled
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): natural lighting conditions supplemented with fluorescent lighting during 8.45-17.00

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 100 mg


Duration of treatment / exposure:
single instillation
Observation period (in vivo):
The eyes were examined for signs of irritation 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 days after treatment.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
6
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): no
SCORING SYSTEM: The irritation was scored according to Draize (1959).

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24/48/72h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24/48/72h
Score:
1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24/48/72h
Score:
0.6
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24/48/72h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Irritant/corrosive response data for each animal up to 72 hours

Score at time point / Reversibility

Cornea

Iris

Conjunctivae

Chemosis

24 h

0/0/0/0/0/0 

 0/0/0/0/0/1

 1/1/1/1/1/2

 1/0/1/1/1/2

48 h

    0/0/0/0/0/0 

 0/0/0/0/0/0 

 1/0/0/0/0/1

 0/0/0/0/0/0

72 h

    0/0/0/0/0/0 

0/0/0/0/0/0  

 1/0/0/0/0/1

 0/0/0/0/0/0  

Average 24h, 48h, 72h

 0

 0.1

 0.6

 0.3

Reversibility*)

 *) Reversibility: c. = completely reversible; n.c. = not completely reversible; n. = not reversible

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
slightly irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: not specified
Conclusions:
The test material was found mildly irritating in a study conducted according to a protocol which was equivalent to guideline, but not compliant with GLP.