Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Toxicity to reproduction

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
reproductive toxicity, other
Remarks:
Evaluation of male reproductive parameters following repeated oral gavage
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2019
Report date:
2019

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The objective of this study was to determine the potential toxicity of Hostaperm Yellow H3G, Novoperm Orange HL70 and Permanent-ROT FGR when given orally by gavage for 14 days to male Wistar Han rats.
The following parameters and end points were evaluated in this study: mortality, clinical signs, body weights, food consumption, gross pathology, sperm analysis, organ weights and histopathologic examinations.
No toxicologically relevant changes were noted in any of the parameters investigated in this study (i.e. mortality, clinical appearance, body weight, food consumption, gross pathology, sperm analysis, organ weights, and histopathologic examination).
In conclusion, administration of Hostaperm Yellow H3G, Novoperm Orange HL 70 or Permanent-ROT FGR in rats at 1000 mg/kg/day by once daily oral gavage for 14 days was well tolerated. In addition, there were no signs of male reproductive toxicity.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Limit test:
yes
Justification for study design:
The aim of this study wa the verification of unexpected effects on spern motility in rats in a previous OECD 422 study with oral gavavge of PO 36. For comparison 2 other pigments were included.

In an OECD422 with PO 36 (Novoperm Orange HL70), possible test item-related effects were observed on sperm motility. The data of this study was used for read-across purposes, therefore three test items were selected to cover a multitude of pigments over several pigment classes as well as a multitude of various functionalities.
The dose levels were selected based on information provided by the Sponsor (similar test materials were well tolerated at 2000 mg/kg bw or 1000 mg/kg bw in acute oral toxicity studies and repeated dose oral toxicity studies (OECD407, 421 and/or 422), respectively. In addition older chronic toxicity and NTP bioassays exist without effects up to 1000 mg/kg. For these studies Wistar and Sprague Dawley rats were used).

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-[(4-chloro-2-nitrophenyl)azo]-N-(2,3-dihydro-2-oxo-1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)-3-oxobutyramide
EC Number:
235-462-4
EC Name:
2-[(4-chloro-2-nitrophenyl)azo]-N-(2,3-dihydro-2-oxo-1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)-3-oxobutyramide
Cas Number:
12236-62-3
Molecular formula:
C17H13ClN6O5
IUPAC Name:
2-[(4-chloro-2-nitrophenyl)diazenyl]-3-oxo-N-(2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzimidazol-5-yl)butanamide
Test material form:
solid: bulk

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Crl: WI(Han)
Sex:
male
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland, Sulzfeld, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 11-12 x wks;
- Weight at study initiation: Males: 328-345 g;

- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: group housed (up to 5 animals of the same dosing group together) in polycarbonate cages
- Use of restrainers for preventing ingestion (if dermal): no
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad lib.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad lib.
- Acclimation period: 8 d

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18-24
- Humidity (%):40-50
- Air changes (per hr): >10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
no
Remarks:
Performed with approved procedures and documented in detail. Formulations visually inspected for homogeneity prior to use and used within 6 hours after adding vehicle to the test item.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
14 days
Frequency of treatment:
once daily
Doses / concentrations
Dose / conc.:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Remarks:
only the limit dose was employed to maximize possible effects
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle

Examinations

Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: weekly

Sperm parameters (parental animals):
Sperm motility and progressive motility were assessed from all samples.
- Sperm smears for morphological evaluation were fixed from all samples and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. Abnormal forms of sperm from a differential count of at least 200 spermatozoa (if possible) per animal was recorded. Evaluation was performed for all samples.
- One epididymis (left) from all males was removed, placed in labeled bags, and kept in the freezer at ≤-15°C. After thawing, the left epididymis was weighed, homogenized and evaluated for sperm numbers. Evaluation was performed for all animals
Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
gross necropsy;
histopathology of:

Epididymis
Gland, prostate
Gland, seminal vesicle
Gross lesions/masses

Results and discussion

Results: P0 (first parental generation)

General toxicity (P0)

Clinical signs:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Coloring of faeces by test item (Orange pigment)
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
no effects observed
Ophthalmological findings:
not examined
Haematological findings:
not examined
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not examined
Urinalysis findings:
not examined
Behaviour (functional findings):
no effects observed
Immunological findings:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
no effects observed

Reproductive function / performance (P0)

Reproductive function: sperm measures:
no effects observed
Reproductive performance:
not examined

Effect levels (P0)

Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
>= 1 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male
Basis for effect level:
histopathology: non-neoplastic

Target system / organ toxicity (P0)

Key result
Critical effects observed:
no
System:
male reproductive system

Results: P1 (second parental generation)

Effect levels (P1)

Key result
Dose descriptor:
other: Only one generation employed
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested

Results: F1 generation

Effect levels (F1)

Key result
Dose descriptor:
other: not determined
Generation:
other: no Offspring produced
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: No offspring produced as the aim of the study was the examination of sperm motility only

Target system / organ toxicity (F1)

Key result
Critical effects observed:
no

Overall reproductive toxicity

Key result
Reproductive effects observed:
no
Treatment related:
no

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
No adverse effects on sperm parameters were detected after 14 day ora gavage of the test item. The NOAEL for spernm effects was 1000 mg/kg/day. Therefore, the negative result in this two-week repeated dose study affirms that the effects on sperm motility observed in the OECD 422 study with Novoperm Orange HL70 were isolated findings and should be considered not adverse and are not to be considered for risk assessment purposes.
Executive summary:

Male Wistar Han rats were treated with Novoperm Orange HL 70 for 14 consecutive days by daily oral gavage at a dose level of 1000 mg/kg.

No toxicologically relevant changes were noted in any of the parameters investigated in this study (i.e. mortality, clinical appearance, body weight, food consumption, gross pathology, sperm analysis, organ weights, and histopathologic examination).

In conclusion, administration of Novoperm Orange HL 70 in rats at 1000 mg/kg/day by once daily oral gavage for 14 days was well tolerated. In addition, there were no signs of male reproductive toxicity.

The effects observed in the OECD 422 study with Novoperm Orange HL70 were confined to sperm motility, which is an ability that spermatids acquire during epididymal transit. In the absence of effects on the testis, a two-week exposure period is considered sufficient to allow the detection of post-testicular effects on sperm. Therefore, the negative result in this two-week repeated dose study affirms that the effects on sperm motility observed in the OECD 422 study with Novoperm Orange HL70 were isolated findings and should be considered not adverse and are not to be considered for risk assessment purposes.