Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-255-4 | CAS number: 31775-89-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicity to reproduction
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- two-generation reproductive toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 013
- Report date:
- 2013
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 416 (Two-Generation Reproduction Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- adapted Jan 2001
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no oestrus cycle and no sperm parameters were evaluated, no sexual maturation parameters were determined, F1 and F2 offspring necropsy data were not reported
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Remarks:
- study was performed in China and it is not clear whether it was performed according to GLP
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 3-{[(3R)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}-2,2-bis({[(3R)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}methyl)propyl (3R)-3-sulfanylbutanoate; 3-{[(3R)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}-2,2-bis({[(3S)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}methyl)propyl (3R)-3-sulfanylbutanoate; 3-{[(3R)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}-2-({[(3R)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}methyl)-2-({[(3S)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}methyl)propyl (3R)-3-sulfanylbutanoate; 3-{[(3S)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}-2,2-bis({[(3S)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}methyl)propyl (3R)-3-sulfanylbutanoate; 3-{[(3S)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}-2,2-bis({[(3S)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}methyl)propyl (3S)-3-sulfanylbutanoate
- EC Number:
- 700-255-4
- Cas Number:
- 31775-89-0
- Molecular formula:
- C21H36O8S4
- IUPAC Name:
- 3-{[(3R)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}-2,2-bis({[(3R)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}methyl)propyl (3R)-3-sulfanylbutanoate; 3-{[(3R)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}-2,2-bis({[(3S)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}methyl)propyl (3R)-3-sulfanylbutanoate; 3-{[(3R)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}-2-({[(3R)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}methyl)-2-({[(3S)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}methyl)propyl (3R)-3-sulfanylbutanoate; 3-{[(3S)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}-2,2-bis({[(3S)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}methyl)propyl (3R)-3-sulfanylbutanoate; 3-{[(3S)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}-2,2-bis({[(3S)-3-sulfanylbutanoyl]oxy}methyl)propyl (3S)-3-sulfanylbutanoate
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Zhejiang Center of Laboratory Animals, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- Females nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes
- Age at study initiation: P1 generation: males: 4-5 weeks old; females: 8-9 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: P1 generation: males: 100 - 128 g; females: 200 - 253 g;
- Fasting period before study: not applicable
- Housing: two per cage (polycarbonated cages, stainless steel racks) not further specified whether these conditions were changed during pregancy/lactation period etc.
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20±3
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): 10-12
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on exposure:
- DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): no data
- Method: the weighed sample was mixed uniformly with some blank feed and the mixed feed of the sample was mixed with the blank feed gradually to achieve the designated concentration
- Details on mating procedure:
- - M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Length of cohabitation: maximum 3 weeks
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug or sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: no
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how): 2 per cage
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- not specified
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- P generation: males: were dosed for 10 weeks prior to mating and continued to be dosed until successful mating
P generation: females: were dosed for 2 weeks prior to mating and dosing continued until the end of lactation
F1 generation: males and females: were dosed for 10 weeks after weaning (about 21 days old), male rats were dosed until successful mating, and female rats were dosed throughout mating, pregnancy and until the end of lactation - Frequency of treatment:
- daily, continuously in the diet
- Details on study schedule:
- - F1 parental animals mated 10 weeks after weaning.
- Selection of parents from F1 generation when pups were about 21 days of age.
- Age at mating of the mated animals in the study: not specified
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 625 ppm
- Remarks:
- equivalent to 71.76 and 61.10 mg/kg bw/day for females and males, respectively, as average of all generations
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 500 ppm
- Remarks:
- equivalent to 294.88 and 251.19 mg/kg bw/day for females and males, respectively, as average of all generations
- Dose / conc.:
- 10 000 ppm
- Remarks:
- equivalent to 1236.29 and 1258.55 mg/kg bw/day for females and males, respectively, as average of all generations
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 24
- Control animals:
- yes, plain diet
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: Based on acute oral LD50 (> 2000 mg/kg bw in male and female rats) and a preliminary dose-range-finding study, 192 SD rats (96 males and 96 females) were randomly assigned to four groups.
- Positive control:
- no
Examinations
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
- Cage side observations: behavior change, abnormality of excretion, death and other toxi clinical signs
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No data
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
Time schedule for examinations: P generations were weighed weekly, the body weights of the pregnant females were ecorded on gestation Day 0, 7, 14, and 21; the body weight of dams and pups (in litter) were measured on Day 0, 4, 7, 14, and 21 (the day pregnant rats delivered was defined as Day 0 post parturition)
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: Yes
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No
OTHER: signs of difficult or prolonged parturition and all signs of toxicity was recorded during delivery - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- not examined
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- Parameters examined in all male parental generations:
testis weight, epididymis weight - Litter observations:
- STANDARDISATION OF LITTERS
- Performed on day 4 postpartum: yes
- If yes, maximum of 8 pups/litter (4/sex/litter as closely as possible); excess pups were killed and discarded.
PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in F1 and F2 offspring:
Each litter was examined as soon as possible after delivery (lactation day 0) to establish the number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, and presence of gross anomalies. Physical postnatal mortality or behavioural abnormalities were recorded. Body weights were measured on Day 0, 4, 7, 14, and 21 (day 0 is defined as the day of delivery)
GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS:
yes, for external and internal abnormalities; possible cause of death was determined for pups born or found dead.
ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROTOXICITY: no
ASSESSMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL IMMUNOTOXICITY: no - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- SACRIFICE
- Male animals: all surviving animals after mating
- Maternal animals: all surviving animals after the last litter of each generation was weaned
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
Weight of ovaries, testicles, and epididymis were determined. Uterus, ovaries, cervix, testicle, epididymis, seminal vesicle, prostate, penis, pituitary, brain and target organs were preserved for histopathological examination. Histopathological examination was carried out on animals in the highest dose group and control group and on abnormal organs/tissues found in gross necropsy. If no significant pathology changes were found in the highest dose group, histopathological examination was not carried out on other treated groups. If significant pathology changes were found in the highest dose group, the other treated groups were also examined. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE
- The F1 offspring not selected as parental animals and all F2 offspring were sacrificed after weaning at 21 days of age.
- These animals were subjected to postmortem examinations (macroscopic and/or microscopic examination) as follows: all were examined for external abnormalities, only pups with external abnormalities or clinical signs were examined macroscopically for any structural abnormalities or pathological changes.
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGTHS
not examined - Statistics:
- A parameter or non-parameter test was selected based on the results of normality test and homogeneity of variance test. One-way analysis of variance and Dunnett's t-test were used in parameter test, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test and Wilcoxon-Wilcox rank sum test were used in non-parameter test, the test level of alpha was 0.05. Chi-square test and Fisher exact prabability test were used in enumeration data, the test level of alpha was 0.05, corrected alpha' was 0.0170.
- Reproductive indices:
- rate of mating success (%) = (number of successful mating animals / number of female animal be mated) x 100%
prenancy rate (%) = (number of pregnant animals / number of female animals be mated) x 100%
live birth rate (%) = (number of female animals producing live offspring / number of pregnant animals) x 100% - Offspring viability indices:
- rate of birth livability (%) = (number of offspring survived on day 4 / number of offspring survived on birth day) x 100%
survival rate after weaning (%) = (number of offspring survived on day 21 after weaning / number of offspring survived on day 4) x 100%
Results and discussion
Results: P0 (first parental generation)
General toxicity (P0)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence):
- One female rat in the control group died during the lactation period.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- high dose group; males: the absolute body weights from week 1 (-18.3%) to week 10 (-12.1%) and the total body weight gain (-16.3%) were significantly lower than in the control group - this effect is considered to be treatment-related and adverse because it is observed throughout treatment and the average food consumption was not significantly changed compared to the control group
high dose group; females: the absolute body weights of week 9 (-12.0%) and 10 (-9.5%) and the total body weight gain (-125%) were significantly lower than in the control group - this effect is considered to be treatment-related and adverse because it is observed throughout treatment and the average food consumption was not significantly changed compared to the control group
mid dose group; males: the absolute body weights at the end of week 1 (-6.5%) were significantly lower than in the control group - this effect is considered to be not of toxicological relevance since it is only observed in week 1 and below 10% and not throughout the treatment
pregnant rats: the absolute body weight in the high dose group on gestation day 0 (-10.1%), 7 (-12.4%), 14 (-13.3%), 20 (-16.6%) and the total body weight gain (-28.5%) during the gestation period were significantly lower than in the control group - this effect is considered to be treatment-related and adverse because it is observed throughout treatment and the average food consumption was not significantly changed compared to the control group
maternal rats during lactation period: the absolute body weight in the high dose group on day 0 (-18.6%), 4 (-19.9%), 7 (-20.3%), 14 (-17.6%), 21 (-11.4%) were significantly lower compared to the control group. The total body weight gain (+48.3%) during lactation period was significantly higher than in the control group - reduced absolute body weight is considered to be treatment-related and adaptive since the total body weight gain is significantly higher than in the control group and the average food consumption was not significantly changed compared to the control group
(see table 3, 5 and 6 in section "any other information on results incl. tables" for more detail) - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Atrophia testiculi and spermatogenesis, ductus epididymis without sperms, epididymal epithelial cells vacuolation and prostatic stromal infiltration of inflammatory cells was found in single animals in the control group as well as in the high dose group. Since these effects were only single observations and found in the control group as well as the high dose group these effects are considered to be incidental and not treament-related. See table 14 under section "any other information on results incl. tables".
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- not examined
Reproductive function / performance (P0)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
Effect levels (P0)
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic toxicity
- Effect level:
- 2 500 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- corresponding to 294.88 and 251.19 mg/kg bw/day for females and males (average of generations), respectively
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- fertility
- Effect level:
- 10 000 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- corresponding to 1236.29 and 1258.55 mg/kg bw/day for females and males (average of generations), respectively
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- reproductive performance
Target system / organ toxicity (P0)
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Results: P1 (second parental generation)
General toxicity (P1)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- high dose group; males: the absolute body weight of male rats at the end of weeks 0 (-35.8%) to 10 (-25.5%) and the total body weight gain (-23.4%) were significantly lower than in the control group - this effect is considered to be treatment-related and adverse because it is observed throughout treatment and the average food consumption was not significantly changed compared to the control group
high dose group: females: the absolute body weight of female rats at the end of weeks 0 (-33.3%) to 10 (-13.6%) were significantly lower than in the control group. The total body weight gain was not significantly different compared to the control group - the reduced absolute body weight is considered treatment-related and adverse because it is observed throughout treatment and the average food consumption was not significantly changed compared to the control group however the total body weight was not changed between high dose group and control group showing that that the initial absolute body weight was lower but the body weight gain was not influenced by the treatment
mid dose group: males: the absolute body weight of male rats at the end of weeks 3 (-5.8%), 4 (-5.9%), 7 (-6.0), 10 (-5.9%) and the total body weight gain (-6.8%) were significantly lower than in the control group - these effects are considered not toxicological relevant since the changes are below 10%
pregnant rats: high dose group: the absolute body weight of pregnant rats on gestation day 0 (-14.3%), 7 (-15.4%), 14 (-16.6%), 20 (-18.5%) and the total body weight gain (-26.9%) during the gestation period were significantly lower than in the control group - this effect is considered to be treatment-related and adverse because it is observed throughout treatment and the average food consumption was not significantly changed compared to the control group
maternal rats in lactation period: high dose group: the absolute body weights of maternal rats on day 0 (-13.8%), 4 (-13.1%), 7 (-10.2%), 14 (-9.4%), 21 (-9.0%) during lactation period were significantly lower than in the control group; the total body weight gain increased (+59.5%) but was not significant compared to the control group - reduced absolute body weight is considered to be treatment-related and adaptive since the total body weight gain is significantly higher than in the control group and the average food consumption was not significantly changed compared to the control group
(see table 4, 5 and 6 under section "any other information on results incl. tables" for more detail) - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The weight of testicles (-11%) and epididymis (-19%) in male rats in the high dose group is significantly decreased compared to the control group. The relative organ weights for both organs are significantly increased (+20% for testicle and +11.5 for epididymis). These effects are considered to be non-treatment related as the changes were <= 20% and no effects on fertility/reproduction were observed.
For detailed information see table 13 under section "any other information on results incl. tables". - Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Compared with the control group, no abnormal tissues/organs were observed in the treatment groups. See table 14 under section "any other information on results incl. tables" for more details.
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- not examined
Reproductive function / performance (P1)
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- not examined
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
Effect levels (P1)
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic toxcity
- Effect level:
- 2 500 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- corresponding to 294.88 mg/kg bw/day (average of generations)
- Sex:
- female
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- systemic toxicity
- Effect level:
- 2 500 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- corresponding to 251.19 mg/kg bw/day (average of generations)
- Sex:
- male
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- fertility
- Effect level:
- 10 000 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- corresponding to 1236.29 and 1258.55 mg/kg bw/day for females and males (average of generations), respectively
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- reproductive performance
Target system / organ toxicity (P1)
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Results: F1 generation
General toxicity (F1)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Survival rate after weaning was not significantly changed between treated groups and control goups. For more detail see table 11 under section "any other information on results incl. tables".
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The average litter weight on day 0 (-23.2%), 4 (-15.3%), 7 (-26.4%), 14 (-26.8%), 21 (-20.3%), and the average body weights of the pups on day 4 (-14.6%), 7 (-25.1%), 14 (-23.0%), 21 (-15.9%) in the high dose group were significantly lower than the control group. These effects are considered to be treatment-related and secondary due to body weight loss of the maternal rats. For more details see tables 7 and 8 under section "any other information on results incl. tables".
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not specified
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- not examined
Developmental neurotoxicity (F1)
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
Developmental immunotoxicity (F1)
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not examined
Effect levels (F1)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- developmental
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- 2 500 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- corresponding to 294.88 and 251.19 mg/kg bw/day for females and males (average of generations), respectively
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
Target system / organ toxicity (F1)
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Results: F2 generation
General toxicity (F2)
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Survival rate after weaning was not significantly changed between treated groups and control goups. For more detail see table 11 under section "any other information on results incl. tables".
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The average litter weight on Day 0 (-20.2%), 4 (-11.9%), and the average body weights of pups on Day 14 (-6.5%) and 21 (-9.0%) of high dose group were significantly lower than in the control group. This effect is considered to be treatment-related and secondary due to body weight loss of maternal rats . For more details see tables 7 and 8 under section "any other information on results incl. tables".
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- not examined
Developmental neurotoxicity (F2)
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
Developmental immunotoxicity (F2)
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not examined
Effect levels (F2)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- developmental
- Generation:
- F2
- Effect level:
- 2 500 ppm
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- corresponding to 294.88 and 251.19 mg/kg bw/day for females and males (average of generations), respectively
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
Target system / organ toxicity (F2)
- Key result
- Critical effects observed:
- no
Overall reproductive toxicity
- Key result
- Reproductive effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 10 000 ppm
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Relation to other toxic effects:
- reproductive effects as a secondary non-specific consequence of other toxic effects
- Dose response relationship:
- yes
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1: Mortality P0-Generation (number of dead animals/total animals) |
|||||
sex |
group |
pre-mating |
mating |
pregnancy |
lactation |
female |
control |
0/24 |
0/24 |
0/23 |
1/23 |
low dose |
0/24 |
0/24 |
0/21 |
0/21 |
|
mid dose |
0/24 |
0/24 |
0/23 |
0/23 |
|
high dose |
0/24 |
0/24 |
0/23 |
0/23 |
|
male |
control |
0/24 |
0/24 |
- |
- |
low dose |
0/24 |
0/24 |
- |
- |
|
mid dose |
0/24 |
0/24 |
- |
- |
|
high dose |
0/24 |
0/24 |
- |
- |
Table 2: Mortality P1-Generation (number of dead animals/total animals) |
|||||
sex |
group |
pre-mating |
mating |
pregnancy |
lactation |
female |
control |
0/24 |
0/24 |
0/23 |
0/23 |
low dose |
0/24 |
0/24 |
0/22 |
0/22 |
|
mid dose |
0/24 |
0/24 |
0/21 |
0/21 |
|
high dose |
0/24 |
0/24 |
0/24 |
0/24 |
|
male |
control |
0/24 |
0/24 |
- |
- |
low dose |
0/24 |
0/24 |
- |
- |
|
mid dose |
0/24 |
0/24 |
- |
- |
|
high dose |
0/24 |
0/24 |
- |
- |
Table 3: Body weight changes P0 Generation (g, mean±SD) |
|||||||||||||
sex |
group |
week 0 |
week 1 |
week 2 |
week 3 |
week 4 |
week 5 |
week 6 |
week 7 |
week 8 |
week 9 |
week 10 |
total body weight gain |
male |
control |
112.15±7.48 |
168.10±8.63 |
214.16±17.38 |
268.63±18.56 |
315.72±19.84 |
346.54±22.55 |
373.45±27.10 |
396.15±29.29 |
409.31±31.69 |
424.40±34.15 |
436.80±32.67 |
324.64±33.78 |
low dose |
112.00±7.04 |
163.11±8.55 |
213.87±12.34 |
264.33±16.68 |
309.95±20.35 |
333.30±26.72 |
356.75±29.44 |
380.08±31.18 |
396.01±36.81 |
412.55±30.55 |
419.78±34.78 |
307.78±35.97 |
|
mid dose |
112.49±7.91 |
157.22±12.74* |
208.91±11.71 |
265.43±13.92 |
311.17±15.84 |
344.56±22.01 |
372.08±25.44 |
398.18±29.4 |
414.35±30.55 |
411.79±73.26 |
435.95±36.91 |
323.46±37.59 |
|
high dose |
112.14±8.60 |
137.38±8.60* |
173.62±12.06* |
216.82±16.70* |
246.07±23.05* |
279.04±27.41* |
314.68±28.35* |
340.00±27.85* |
359.30±29.25* |
378.39±27.47* |
383.87±29.90* |
271.73±28.50* |
|
female |
control |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
231.13±10.77 |
239.90±9.98 |
246.71±11.12 |
15.58±9.99 |
low dose |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
229.92±10.29 |
236.30±12.79 |
243.70±12.75 |
13.78±11.22 |
|
mid dose |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
228.96±10.54 |
232.68±12.69 |
243.03±14.89 |
14.07±11.50 |
|
high dose |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
227.43±10.87 |
211.22±10.88* |
223.38±12.27* |
-4.05±11.05 |
|
* Dunnett's t-test, compared with control group p < 0.05 |
Table 4: Body weight changes P1 Generation (g, mean±SD) |
|||||||||||||
sex |
group |
week 0 |
week 1 |
week 2 |
week 3 |
week 4 |
week 5 |
week 6 |
week 7 |
week 8 |
week 9 |
week 10 |
total body weight gain |
male |
control |
81.32±10.22 |
131.81±14.39 |
173.16±24.51 |
243.99±21.74 |
294.58±23.58 |
337.72±24.37 |
371.80±33.17 |
403.90±27.67 |
427.83±29.36 |
453.53±34.70 |
467.33±37.56 |
386.01±34.61 |
low dose |
81.75±8.02 |
129.66±12.51 |
174.45±14.16 |
238.73±17.48 |
286.89±17.61 |
331.82±19.92 |
367.80±22.76 |
395.48±26.57 |
420.86±28.76 |
435.39±35.36 |
450.57±32.37 |
368.81±28.66 |
|
mid dose |
79.70±12.40 |
123.90±17.35 |
169.84±21.99 |
229.89±25.23* |
277.15±30.41* |
324.35±31.31 |
358.65±36.39 |
379.79±50.50* |
407.18±44.18 |
431.90±46.39 |
439.65±51.51* |
359.95±44.83* |
|
high dose |
52.21±8.57* |
77.63±10.05* |
107.03±13.24* |
151.77±17.54* |
187.23±19.89* |
220.75±22.44* |
261.80±24.42* |
285.65±28.06* |
300.17±28.10* |
327.91±32.09* |
348.04±35.73* |
295.83±30.82* |
|
female |
control |
74.80±8.91 |
115.86±12.09 |
148.50±13.31 |
177.35±14.42 |
190.72±14.49 |
214.78±14.94 |
230.55±15.56 |
238.94±16.76 |
248.94±16.24 |
259.16±19.89 |
264.15±21.66 |
189.35±17.41 |
low dose |
77.10±9.42 |
118.14±12.97 |
151.65±12.58 |
179.60±13.07 |
191.28±14.42 |
213.55±16.67 |
231.36±18.05 |
236.19±17.20 |
250.86±16.48 |
256.81±18.28 |
262.86±18.45 |
185.75±16.02 |
|
mid dose |
70.56±11.08 |
110.25±11.88 |
143.45±11.23 |
176.83±11.32 |
188.94±12.26 |
211.34±13.08 |
229.30±15.22 |
237.65±13.40 |
247.83±11.72 |
257.36±12.99 |
259.81±14.06 |
189.25±15.86 |
|
high dose |
49.90±8.65* |
72.43±9.41* |
98.28±12.08* |
131.78±13.04* |
149.80±14.29* |
173.10±14.83* |
192.56±15.38* |
200.63±15.87* |
217.08±23.57* |
222.70±18.62* |
228.20±19.33* |
178.30±14.78 |
|
* Dunnett's t-test, compared with control group p < 0.05 |
Table 5: Body weight changes of pregnant rats (g, mean±SD) |
||||||
maternal rats |
group |
day 0 |
day 7 |
day 14 |
day 20 |
total body weight gain |
P0 |
control |
253.39±10.71 |
290.56±14.40 |
325.08±17.59 |
393.50±31.57 |
140.11±33.00 |
low dose |
251.76±12.43 |
283.54±14.28 |
313.21±18.64 |
375.79±35.50 |
124.02±33.55 |
|
mid dose |
252.56±15.38 |
281.00±18.90 |
316.15±21.54 |
380.26±29.44 |
127.70±21.94 |
|
high dose |
227.90±14.46* |
254.65±19.96* |
281.71±21.10* |
328.05±23.99* |
100.15±19.63* |
|
P1 |
control |
268.66±20.93 |
293.85±22.73 |
324.56±26.91 |
402.37±33.52 |
133.71±17.80 |
low dose |
267.99±20.20 |
295.00±22.66 |
327.13±24.15 |
405.77±30.33 |
137.78±14.49 |
|
mid dose |
263.82±11.38 |
282.79±14.28 |
313.40±16.16 |
388.47±20.92 |
124.65±12.39 |
|
high dose |
230.35±18.86* |
248.60±19.42* |
270.68±21.51* |
328.05±27.39* |
97.70±15.36 |
|
* Dunnett's t-test, compared with control group p < 0.05 |
Table 6: Body weight changes of maternal rats during lactation (g, mean±SD) |
|||||||
maternal rats |
group |
day 0 |
day 4 |
day 7 |
day 14 |
day 21 |
total body weight gain |
P0 |
control |
307.07±21.21 |
321.84±21.49 |
333.67±16.38 |
338.23±21.81 |
341.51±20.23 |
35.45±20.84 |
low dose |
301.11±22.93 |
319.34±21.20 |
325.50±21.91 |
328.90±26.32 |
336.21±21.21 |
35.10±17.16 |
|
mid dose |
294.80±23.78 |
313.67±23.21 |
319.74±24.83* |
327.29±18.03 |
331.83±22.37 |
37.03±13.69 |
|
high dose |
249.84±18.40* |
257.90±18.72* |
265.91±17.51* |
278.87±27.06* |
302.43±32.25 |
52.59±32.19* |
|
P1 |
control |
316.86±26.24 |
341.02±29.0 |
346.23±29.23 |
351.52±23.69 |
339.16±25.96 |
22.30±18.25 |
low dose |
315.21±26.71 |
338.86±27.4 |
345.82±23.08 |
355.38±24.47 |
339.14±20.82 |
23.93±12.59 |
|
mid dose |
303.06±22.91 |
332.25±20.06 |
340.80±20.29 |
342.13±18.05 |
336.94±13.13 |
30.88±14.11 |
|
high dose |
272.98±33.23* |
296.38±33.93* |
311.02±30.13* |
318.45±22.60* |
308.55±25.41* |
35.57±26.07 |
|
* Dunnett's t-test, compared with control group p < 0.05 |
Table 7: Litter weight changes of pups (g, mean±SD) |
|||||||
Filial generation |
group |
day 0 |
day 4 |
day 4 after adjusting |
day 7 |
day 14 |
day 21 |
F1 |
control |
84.12±18.73 |
133.30±27.86 |
86.57±13.36 |
132.07±23.96 |
258.97±38.97 |
425.77±61.61 |
low dose |
85.51±12.35 |
133.46±16.94 |
88.67±9.54 |
128.81±22.12 |
236.62±57.74 |
415.74±71.37 |
|
mid dose |
84.40±15.27 |
127.43±25.49 |
86.49±10.21 |
127.66±26.41 |
227.07±66.23 |
382.08±121.39 |
|
high dose |
64.62±11.42* |
90.96±15.67* |
73.35±11.91* |
97.19±20.39* |
189.65±42.80* |
339.47±65.81* |
|
F2 |
control |
89.54±10.69 |
133.05±32.13 |
85.05±13.41 |
137.75±19.85 |
273.84±27.49 |
464.59±52.67 |
low dose |
91.99±12.14 |
147.19±19.72 |
85.10±7.59 |
138.76±12.29 |
274.83±41.10 |
454.40±70.83 |
|
mid dose |
87.64±8.44 |
140.10±20.95 |
85.3±9.54 |
134.85±13.86 |
269.01±33.22 |
446.64±57.33 |
|
high dose |
71.43±11.00* |
117.17±13.33* |
83.66±5.05 |
130.80±9.03 |
260.55±20.01 |
429.67±33.32 |
|
* Dunnett's t-test, compared with control group p < 0.05 |
Table 8: Body weight changes of pups (g, mean±SD) |
|||||||
Filial generation |
group |
day 0 |
day 4 |
day 4 after adjusting |
day 7 |
day 14 |
day 21 |
F1 |
control |
6.93±0.49 |
11.07±1.19 |
11.21±1.29 |
17.19±2.33 |
33.77±3.22 |
55.92±4.85 |
low dose |
6.87±0.57 |
11.04±1.16 |
11.08±1.19 |
16.90±1.89 |
32.37±3.26 |
56.65±4.50 |
|
mid dose |
7.03±0.57 |
10.91±1.79 |
11.05±1.66 |
16.65±3.09 |
32.89±4.69 |
54.89±9.68 |
|
high dose |
6.67±0.69 |
9.56±1.50* |
9.57±1.50* |
12.87±2.35* |
26.00±5.09* |
47.05±8.63* |
|
F2 |
control |
6.57±0.52 |
10.12±2.38 |
10.45±1.76 |
17.37±2.19 |
34.99±2.69 |
59.35±5.39 |
low dose |
6.43±0.51 |
10.87±1.59 |
10.64±0.95 |
17.34±1.54 |
35.93±2.84 |
59.29±4.51 |
|
mid dose |
6.48±0.33 |
10.66±1.18 |
10.66±1.19 |
17.07±1.71 |
36.15±2.63 |
59.94±3.79 |
|
high dose |
6.35±0.23 |
10.37±0.63 |
10.46±0.63 |
16.35±1.13 |
32.73±2.13* |
53.98±3.63* |
|
* Dunnett's t-test, compared with control group p < 0.05 |
Table 9: Average food consumption of P0 generation (g/kg bw/day) |
||||||
sex |
group |
pre-mating |
mating period |
pregnancy period |
lactation |
average |
male |
control |
94.51 |
73.82 |
- |
- |
92.63 |
low dose |
94.63 |
74.11 |
- |
- |
92.77 |
|
mid dose |
98.54 |
75.56 |
- |
- |
96.45 |
|
high dose |
127.52 |
84.79 |
- |
- |
123.64 |
|
female |
control |
92.49 |
73.82 |
125.69 |
182.73 |
113.28 |
low dose |
94.47 |
74.11 |
99.55 |
185.24 |
110.1 |
|
mid dose |
94.95 |
75.56 |
100.68 |
191.08 |
111.69 |
|
high dose |
96.04 |
84.79 |
111.86 |
207.53 |
117.79 |
Table 10: Average food consumption of P1 generation (g/kg bw/day) |
||||||
sex |
group |
pre-mating |
mating period |
pregnancy period |
lactation |
average |
male |
control |
106.41 |
62.54 |
- |
- |
103.48 |
low dose |
105.31 |
67.19 |
- |
- |
102.77 |
|
mid dose |
107.1 |
68.12 |
- |
- |
104.5 |
|
high dose |
131.76 |
76.47 |
- |
- |
128.07 |
|
female |
control |
111.37 |
62.54 |
85.31 |
184.24 |
117.41 |
low dose |
115.89 |
67.19 |
86.48 |
179.38 |
119.64 |
|
mid dose |
121.49 |
69.12 |
88.72 |
183.86 |
124.22 |
|
high dose |
127.38 |
76.47 |
94.81 |
185.32 |
129.46 |
Table 11: Reproduction index of P generation |
||||||
parental generation |
group |
succsessful mating (%) |
pregnancy (%) |
live birth rate (%) |
rate of birth livability (%) |
survival rate after weaning (%) |
P0 |
control |
100.0 (24/24) |
95.8 (23/24) |
100.0 (23/23) |
99.6 (281/282) |
94.4 (168/178) |
low dose |
87.5 (21/24) |
87.5 (21/24) |
100.0 (21/21) |
97.7 (258/265) |
92.3 (155/168) |
|
mid dose |
95.5 (23/24) |
95.8 (23/24) |
100.0 (23/23) |
97.8 (272/278) |
86.2 (156/181) |
|
high dose |
100.0 (24/24) |
95.8 (23/24) |
100.0 (23/23) |
98.7 (224/227) |
94.9 (168/177) |
|
P1 |
control |
95.8 (23/24) |
95.8 (23/24) |
100.0 (23/23) |
92.1 (290/315) |
95.6 (172/180) |
low dose |
91.7 (22/24) |
91.7 (22/24) |
100.0 (22/22) |
95.9 (302/315) |
96.0 (169/176) |
|
mid dose |
87.5 (21/24) |
87.5 (21/24 |
100.0 (21/21) |
96.8 (276/285) |
93.5 (157/168) |
|
high dose |
100.0 (24/24) |
100.0 (24/24) |
100.0 (24/24) |
95.3 (261/274) |
99.5 (183/184) |
Table 12: Organ weight (g) and Organ coefficient (%) of P0 generation (mean±SD) |
||||||
organ weights (g) |
organ coefficient (%) |
|||||
sex |
group |
body weight (g) |
testicle/ovary |
epididymis |
testicle/ovary |
epididymis |
male |
control |
440.55±32.21 |
3.49±0.54 |
1.21±0.12 |
0.79±0.12 |
0.28±0.03 |
low dose |
425.98±35.97 |
3.45±0.74 |
1.17±0.17 |
0.81±0.16 |
0.27±0.03 |
|
mid dose |
445.10±35.09 |
3.65±0.56 |
1.31±0.10* |
0.82±0.14 |
0.30±0.03 |
|
high dose |
390.03±30.95* |
3.47±0.54 |
1.13±0.14 |
0.90±0.16 |
0.29±0.04 |
|
female |
control |
322.48±34.49 |
0.15±0.03 |
- |
0.048±0.012 |
- |
low dose |
332.74±21.58 |
0.16±0.03 |
- |
0.047±0.009 |
- |
|
mid dose |
331.96±21.50 |
0.16±0.02 |
- |
0.046±0.008 |
- |
|
high dose |
301.70±31.74* |
0.12±0.02* |
- |
0.039±0.008* |
- |
|
* Dunnett's t-test, compared with control group p < 0.05 |
Table 13: Organ weight (g) and Organ coefficient (%) of P1 generation (mean±SD) |
||||||
organ weights (g) |
relative organ weights (%) |
|||||
sex |
group |
body weight (g) |
testicle/ovary |
epididymis |
testicle/ovary |
epididymis |
male |
control |
480.33±36.39 |
3.54±0.23 |
1.26±0.10 |
0.74±0.06 |
0.26±0.02 |
low dose |
467.01±36.22 |
3.63±0.24 |
1.30±0.12 |
0.78±0.07 |
0.28±0.03 |
|
mid dose |
458.83±51.92 |
3.49±0.26 |
1.25±0.12 |
0.77±0.08 |
0.28±0.04 |
|
high dose |
355.31±34.81* |
3.15±0.27* |
1.02±0.10* |
0.89±0.09* |
0.29±0.03* |
|
female |
control |
340.52±26.64 |
0.16±0.03 |
- |
0.047±0.009 |
- |
low dose |
338.67±20.60 |
0.17±0.02 |
- |
0.051±0.007 |
- |
|
mid dose |
341.23±24.02 |
0.17±0.03 |
- |
0.049±0.009 |
- |
|
high dose |
308.56.25.40* |
0.15±0.03 |
- |
0.049±0.009 |
- |
Table 14: Histopathology of male rats |
||||||
parental generation |
group |
total animal number |
animal number effected |
|||
A |
B |
C |
D |
|||
P0 |
control |
24 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
low dose |
24 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
mid dose |
24 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
high dose |
24 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
P1 |
control |
24 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
low dose |
24 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
mid dose |
24 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
high dose |
24 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
|
A = Atrophia testiculi and spermatogenesis B = ductus epididymis without sperms C = epididymal epithelial cells vacuolation D = prostatic stromal infiltration of inflammatory cells |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.