Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 265-078-2 | CAS number: 64741-77-1 A complex combination of hydrocarbons from distillation of the products from a hydrocracking process. It consists predominantly of saturated hydrocarbons having carbon numbers predominantly in the range of C10 through C18, and boiling in the range of approximately 160°C to 320°C (320°F to 608°F).
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
Description of key information
The dermal carcinogenic potential of representative samples of petroleum gas oils from the VHGO category has been investigated in a number of published studies. Materials were applied either neat or as dilutions in solvent, to the clipped skin of mice two or three times per week for either 2 years or the lifetime of the animal. In these studies there was a significant increase in skin tumour yield with the majority of samples tested. Numbers of animals showing dermal tumours was relatively small and the tumours had a long latent period. The samples also caused significant non-neoplastic dermal changes including hyperplasia which may have contributed to the tumourigenic response.
It is concluded that these materials are at best weakly carcinogenic but that the response may have been mediated by a non-genotoxic mechanism, involving repeated skin damage.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Carcinogenicity: via oral route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Carcinogenicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Carcinogenicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- 25 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- chronic
- Species:
- mouse
Justification for classification or non-classification
VGO/Hydrocracked/Distillate Fuels exhibited varying levels of activity in carcinogenicity testing with some materials demonstrating low carcinogenic potential and others a marked response both in the presence of severe irritation. Carcinogenic activity is reported in the presence of repeated dermal irritation, which could be prevented by limiting irritation. However, in view of the questionable adequacy of the PAH analysis and the high levels of phenanthrene and pyrene found in some samples tested in the key study, it is uncertain whether a genotoxic mechanism can be ruled out.
Therefore VGO/Hydrocracked/Distillate fuels are classified as Category 2, H351, according to the EU CLP Regulation (EC)1272/2008. This is in line with the harmonized classification assigned to most of the members of the category as in Annex VI of the regulation.
Additional information
The potential for members of the VHGO category to cause skin cancer has been investigated in seven independent studies, One key dermal cancer study (Biles et al. 1988; Klimisch = 2) was identified to evaluate the carcinogenicity potential of VHGO members.
In this study, undiluted test material (25 µl) was applied three times weekly to the clipped dorsal skin of groups of 40 or 50 male C3H/HeJ mice for the lifetime of each animal or until all of the animals in the test group developed grossly diagnosed carcinomas. There were 10 different middle distillates tested. Common names for the materials tested that are relevant for the VHGO category are as follows:
Two samples of commercial no. 2 heating oil (20% catalytic cracked) with different boiling points.
Commercial no. 2 heating oil (no cracked stocks),
Commercial no. 2 heating oil (50% cat. cracked),
Commercial no. 2 heating oil (37% cat. cracked),
Commercial no. 2 heating oil (25% cat. cracked 75% coker liquids),
Commercial no. 2 heating oil (20% cat. cracked),
Virgin heating oil blending base+ catalytically cracked middle distillate (59%)
Treatment with a highly refined oil in the negative control groups produced no tumours whereas the positive control group treated with catalytically cracked clarified oil at concentrations of 1%, 3.3%, 20% and 25% showed tumour incidences of 18%, 78%, 100% and 98% respectively, with time to first tumour of 61, 37 16 and 17 weeks.
Clear evidence of skin irritation/skin injury was seen with all the test materials including hyperplasia, hyperkeratosis, dermatitis, epidermal degeneration and epidermal necrosis. Tumour incidences in internal organs were reported to be sporadic and, except for hepatocellular carcinoma, to be of low frequency.
It was noted by the authors that there was a significant increase in skin tumour yield with the majority of samples tested, but that non-neoplastic dermal changes including hyperplasia may have contributed to the tumourigenic response.
Additional data support that VGOs/HGOs/Distillate fuels are carcinogens (IIT Research Institute, 1985; NTP, 1986; Witschi et al., 1987; Clark et al., 1988; Gerhart et al., 1988; API, 1989; Broddle et al., 1996;). This information is presented in the dossier. Animals treated with straight run gas oil exhibited relatively slow tumour growth in the presence of concurrent skin irritation, suggesting tumour induction via a non-genotoxic mechanism. The dermal carcinogenicity study conducted by IIT Research Institute (1985) demonstrated that marine diesel fuel is carcinogenic in mice (9 of 46 animals exhibited malignant tumours) while a study conducted by NTP (1986) showed equivocal evidence of carcinogenicity in male and female B6C3F1 mice. Witschi et al. (1987) demonstrated that fuel oil (API fuel No. 2) had low tumourigenic potential. Clark et al. 1988 and Gerhart et al. 1988 conducted dermal carcinogenicity studies which indicate that diesel and furnace oil have carcinogenic potential.
Summary
In deriving an overview of the carcinogenicity of VGOs/HGOs/Distillate fuels it is important to consider carcinogenicity studies on gas oil samples together with information on their irritancy potential, and available evidence on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon levels, genotoxicity data and other mechanistic studies (e.g. initiation/promotion testing; modified Ames test).
The overall data available on gas oils indicate that they produce severe dermal irritation when applied repeatedly to the skin in neat form; observations made during most of the studies reported draw attention to this. Histological examination confirms epidermal necrosis, ulceration and dermal damage with inflammatory changes are often seen together with marked acanthosis (epidermal hyperplasia). While evidence suggests that dilution with a volatile organic solvent does not reduce skin irritation appreciably, the irritancy properties of gas oils and other middle distillates can be reduced substantially by dilution with highly refined mineral oil. It is evident that the level of skin irritation produced by neat gas oils would probably be sufficient to produce skin tumours in mice by a non-genotoxic mechanism, even in the absence of significant amounts of genotoxic constituents. However in order to demonstrate that a non-genotoxic process was responsible for skin tumour induction, it is essential to show that the gas oils concerned do not contain significant levels of genotoxic ingredients and produce a tumour response consistent with that of a non-genotoxic substance (e.g. a tumour incidence of less than 25% with a latent period in excess of 1 year).
Of the gas oil blends and products containing cracked components that have been tested in long term skin painting studies (n =18), the majority produced moderate incidences of skin tumours, although in many instances no supporting information on PAC content, modified Ames data or information on initiating/promotion activity is available. Nonetheless, two samples containing cracked material have been showed to exhibit some degree of initiating activity, while analyses of 3-7 ring PACs and Mutagenicity Index data on these and other samples not subject to mouse skin painting tests, are consistent with the likelihood of a genotoxic mechanism. In view of this it is probable that tumours produced by blends containing cracked components could be linked to a genotoxic mechanism of action.
Justification for selection of carcinogenicity via dermal route endpoint:
One of seven long-term mouse skin paining studies undertaken on representative materials from the VHGO category.
Carcinogenicity: via dermal route (target organ): other: skin
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.