Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
Version / remarks:
(2006, corrected 2011)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
(the variation of the light intensity exceeded 15% (25-27%). The deviation was considered not to have affected the integrity of the study as the guideline recommended range of individual measurements was met and the validity criteria were fulfilled.)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
Version / remarks:
(2009)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
(the variation of the light intensity exceeded 15% (25-27%). The deviation was considered not to have affected the integrity of the study as the guideline recommended range of individual measurements was met and the validity criteria were fulfilled.)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
On each sampling occasion, one sample from each level was analysed for TOC. Samples at test end were taken from flasks which contained no algal cells.
Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
REPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: water accommodated fractions (WAF)
For the test media with nominal loading rates of 100, 31.3, 9.77, 3.05 and 0.954 mg/L aliquots of the test material were dispersed in dilution medium. The preparations were stirred for approximately 24 hours in the dark, then left to stand for approximately 24 hours in the dark. An aliquot was then syphoned from a mid-vessel location of each preparation vessel, of which the first litre was discarded, to give the Water Accommodated Fractions (WAF) which were used as test media. The lowest nominal loading rate of 0.298 mg/L was prepared by dilution of an aliquot of the WAF at 0.954 mg/L.
Test organisms (species):
Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (previous names: Raphidocelis subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Strain: CCAP 278/4
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa (CCAP), Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, Oban, Argyll, Scotland
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): Three days. Algal cells used for inoculation were in the log phase of growth.
- Method of cultivation: Liquid slope cultures were stored in an illuminated refrigerator. Sterile algal nutrient medium was inoculated with cells aseptically removed from the slope culture; these primary liquid cultures were incubated for approximately three days in an orbital incubator under continuous illumination at nominal temperatures in the range 21 to 24°C. Subsequently, appropriate volumes of these primary cultures were aseptically transferred to fresh sterile algal nutrient medium to prepare secondary liquid cultures; these cultures were incubated, as stated above, for three days and used as inoculum for the test.

ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 3 days (pre-culturing)
- Culturing media and conditions (same as test or not): same
Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
72 h
Hardness:
24 mg/L as CaCO3
Test temperature:
22-24 °C
pH:
test start (0 h): 7.4-7.9
test end (72 h): 8.9-9.8
Nominal and measured concentrations:
nominal loading rates: 0.298, 0.954, 3.05, 9.77, 31.3 and 100 mg/L as WAF
mean measured TOC levels (after background correction):
test start:
2.61 and 3.56 mg/L at nominal 31.3 and 100 mg/L;
control mean: 2.76 mg C/L.

test end (72 hours):
1.87 and 3.18 mg/L at nominal 31.3 and 100 mg/L;
control mean: 2.88 mg C/L.

arithmetric mean: 2.21 and 3.37 mg/L at nominal 31.3 and 100 mg/L
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 250 mL conical flasks (autoclaved) containing 100 mL of inoculated test medium and loosly plugged with foam bungs
- Aeration/gaseous exchange: orbital incubator, oscillating at nominal 130 cycles per minute
- Initial cells density: ca. 1x10⁴ cells/mL
- Control end cells density: 198x10⁴ cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6

GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes

TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: OECD medium according to guidelines, using filtered, dechlorinated tap water, softened and treated by reverse osmosis before microfiltration and purification (resistivity 18 Megohm/cm)
- Total organic carbon: 2.8 mg C/L
- Ca/Mg ratio: 1:1
- Culture medium different from test medium: no

OTHER TEST CONDITIONS- Sterile test conditions: no
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: continuous illumination
- Light intensity and quality: 4620 to 7340 Lux provided by 6 x 30 W “cool white” 1 metre fluorescent tubes. Light intensity within the test area was determined each day at four corner positions and in a central position of the random block design. To minimise the impact of differences in light intensity across the test area on algal growth, control and test flasks were re-positioned in the test area each day during the test.
The light intensity measured at the corner positions was within ±15% of the mean value over the study period. In the center of the incubator, it ranged between 25-27% of the mean. As the individual measurements were all guideline conform (4440 - 8880 Lux) and the validity criteria were met, this deviation to guideline was not thought to have affected either the validity or integrity of the study.

EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : cell densities measured at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Determination of cell concentrations: haemocytometer (Improved Neubauer)

TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 3.2
- Range finding study
- Test concentrations: nominal loading rates of 1.0, 10 and 100 mg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study:
inhibition of algal growth after 72 hours was 95 and 17% at 100 and 10 mg/L and not significant at 1.0 mg/L.
Reference substance (positive control):
not specified
Remarks:
Laboratory reference tests using potassium dichromate are performed on a regulary basis but were not reported.
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL50
Effect conc.:
> 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: growth rate, yield and biomass
Remarks on result:
other: results are expressed in terms of loading rates
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOELR
Effect conc.:
>= 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: growth rate, yield and biomass
Remarks on result:
other: results are expressed in terms of loading rates
Details on results:
- Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test): no microscopic abnormalities
- Any stimulation of growth found in any treatment: no biologically significant stimulation of growth was observed (see Tables 1 and 2).

At the start of the test, the test media (as WAF) at nominal loading rates of 31.3 and 100 mg/L were hazy. All other conentrations were colourless.
Reported statistics and error estimates:
Statistical analysis was perfomed using SAS 9.1 (SAS Institute 2002), using nominal loading rates. 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the likelihood ratio method. Williams’ test was used to compare each treated group with control unless there was evidence of a non-monotonic dose-response relationship, in which case Dunnett’s test was used.

In a first main test employing WAFs with nominal loading rates of 0.298, 0.954, 3.05, 9.77, 31.3 and 100 mg/L, growth was inhibited by 20% at 100 mg/L after at 72 hours, with no significant inhibition in at any of the other test groups (except 19% inhibition was observed at 3.05 mg/L). Owing to variation in the results of TOC analysis and the difference in biological data compared with the range finding phase, the test was repeated using the same test concentrations and under the same exposure conditions. The data obtained in the first main test was replicated in the repeat test, suggesting that the findings in the range finding test were not representative and the reason for this was not known. The data from the repeat test are reported.

 

Table 1: Cell densities

 

Nominal loading rates

(mg/L)

Replicate

number

Cell densities (cells/mL)

0 hours

24 hours

48 hours

72 hours

 

 

 

 

 

 

Control

R1

10000

53750

313750

2152500

 

R2

10000

75000

337500

2105000

 

R3

10000

53750

336250

1885000

 

R4

10000

71250

305000

1972500

 

R5

10000

47500

320000

1847500

 

R6

10000

58750

323750

1912500

 

Mean

10000

60000

322708

1979167

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.298

R1

10000

53750

317500

1665000

 

R2

10000

71250

246250

1815000

 

R3

10000

61250

278750

2105000

 

Mean

10000

62083

280833

1861667

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.954

R1

11250

51250

327500

1730000

 

R2

11250

65000

361250

1835000

 

R3

11250

60000

333750

1595000

 

Mean

11250

58750

340833

1720000

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.05

R1

12500

55000

312500

1690000

 

R2

12500

51250

315000

1747500

 

R3

12500

65000

347500

2035000

 

Mean

12500

57083

325000

1824167

 

 

 

 

 

 

9.77

R1

11250

70000

316250

1620000

 

R2

11250

53750

358750

1927500

 

R3

11250

67500

338750

1830000

 

Mean

11250

63750

337917

1792500

 

 

 

 

 

 

31.3

R1

10000

42500

316250

1490000

 

R2

10000

68750

351250

2027500

 

R3

10000

45000

311250

1810000

 

Mean

10000

52083

326250

1775833

 

 

 

 

 

 

100

R1

8750

73750

356250

1667500

 

R2

8750

95000

397500

2047500

 

R3

8750

71250

363750

1835000

 

Mean

8750

80000

372500

1850000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

R1-R6        replicate number

 

 

Table 2  Inhibition of growth

 

Parameter

Nominal loading

rates

(mg/L)

Sample size

Mean

Inhibition

(%)

p-value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Growth rate to

72 hours

Control

6

0.0734

0.0

 

 

0.00931

3

0.0725

1.2

0.892D

 

0.0298

3

0.0698

4.9

0.009**D

 

0.0954

3

0.0692

5.8

0.002**D

 

0.305

3

0.0704

4.1

0.030*D

 

0.977

3

0.0718

2.2

0.443D

 

3.13

3

0.0743

-1.2

0.893D

 

 

 

 

 

 

Growth rate

0 to 24 hours

Control

6

0.0741

0.0

 

0.00931

3

0.0758

-2.3

1.000D

0.0298

3

0.0687

7.3

0.809D

0.0954

3

0.0631

14.9

0.184D

0.305

3

0.0720

2.8

0.997D

0.977

3

0.0678

8.6

0.695D

3.13

3

0.0919

-24.0

0.013*D

 

 

 

 

 

 

Growth rate

24 to 48 hours

Control

6

0.0706

0.0

 

0.00931

3

0.0629

10.9

0.542D

0.0298

3

0.0734

-4.0

0.990D

0.0954

3

0.0726

-2.8

0.998D

0.305

3

0.0697

1.3

1.000D

0.977

3

0.0774

-9.6

0.663D

3.13

3

0.0644

8.8

0.732D

 

 

 

 

 

 

Growth rate

48 to 72 hours

Control

6

0.0755

0.0

 

0.00931

3

0.0788

-4.4

1.000W

0.0298

3

0.0674

10.7

0.067W

0.0954

3

0.0718

5.0

0.067W

0.305

3

0.0695

8.0

0.067W

0.977

3

0.0703

6.9

0.067W

3.13

3

0.0667

11.7

0.007**W

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yield to 72 hours

Control

6

1969167

0.0

 

 

0.00931

3

1851667

6.0

0.365W

 

0.0298

3

1708750

13.2

0.197W

 

0.0954

3

1811667

8.0

0.197W

 

0.305

3

1781250

9.5

0.197W

 

0.977

3

1765833

10.3

0.197W

 

3.13

3

1841250

6.5

0.197W

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

p values are for the comparison with Control using Williams' test (W) and Dunnett's test (D)

*p< 0.05,  **p< 0.01,  ***p< 0.001

Note: Negative values indicate an increase in algal growth above that of Control growth

 

Control cultures:

-cell concentration increased by a factor of 198;

-the mean coefficient of variation for section by section daily growth rates in the control cultures was 8.9%;

- the coefficient of variation for the average specific growth rates of the control cultures was 1.17% during the 72 hour exposure period.

 

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Remarks:
Increase of biomass >16 after 72 hours; mean coefficient of variation for section-by-section specific growth rate <35%; coefficient of variation for average specific growth rate <7%.

Description of key information

effect values for average specific growth rates of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, 0-72 h, based on loading rates (OECD TG 201, EU C.3):
EL50: >100 mg/L, NOELR: ≥ 100 mg/L

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

EL50  for freshwater algae >100 mg/L
NOELR for freshwater algae >100 mg/L


The results indicate that the test material is not inhibitory to growth of algae up to the limits of its water solubility (<1 mg/L) and a NOEC and thus a PNEC cannot be determined.