Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
other information
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Non-GLP study - acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1980

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Code of Federal Regulations, Title 16, Section 1500.42 - similar to OECD 405
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Biphenyl-4-ol
EC Number:
202-179-2
EC Name:
Biphenyl-4-ol
Cas Number:
92-69-3
Molecular formula:
C12H10O
IUPAC Name:
[1,1'-biphenyl]-4-ol

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White

Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: opposite untreated eye served as control
Duration of treatment / exposure:
8 days - Findings 24, 48, 72 hours, 8 days
Observation period (in vivo):
8 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
6

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24,48,72 hours
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 hours
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 hours
Score:
0.17
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 hours
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 24, 48, 72 hours
Score:
0
Max. score:
4

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Remarks:
Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU