Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Justification for type of information:
Data is from experimental study report.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016
Report date:
2016

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The purpose of this study was to assess the Toxicological profile of test item to a single administration via oral route to Sprague Dawley rats. This study was designed to determine the acute toxicity at fixed dose levels by oral route of the test item.
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Aluminium, 2-(1,3-dihydro-3-oxo-5-sulfo-2H-indol-2-ylidene)-2,3-dihydro-3-oxo-1H-indole-5-sulfonic acid complex
EC Number:
240-589-3
EC Name:
Aluminium, 2-(1,3-dihydro-3-oxo-5-sulfo-2H-indol-2-ylidene)-2,3-dihydro-3-oxo-1H-indole-5-sulfonic acid complex
Cas Number:
16521-38-3
Molecular formula:
C16H10AlN2O8S2
IUPAC Name:
aluminium, 2-(1,3-dihydro-3-oxo-5-sulfo-2H-indol-2-ylidene)-2,3-dihydro-3-oxo-1H-indole-5-sulfonic acid complex
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Aluminium, 2-(1,3-dihydro-3-oxo-5-sulfo-2H-indol-2-ylidene)-2,3-dihydro-3-oxo-1H-indole-5-sulfonic acid complex- Common Name: C.I. Food Blue 1-aluminum lake- Molecular formula: C16H10AlN2O8S2- Molecular weight: 449.370738 g/mol- Smiles notation: C1(=C2\C(c3cc(S(O)(=O)=O)ccc3N2)=O)\C(c2cc(S(O)(=O)=O)ccc2N1)=O.[Al+3]- Substance type: Organic- Physical state: Solid- Source of test material: Sustainability Support Services (Europe) AB, Sweden - Batch No. of test material: GA/BH/14-15/10/MS- Manufacturing Date: April, 2015- Expiration date of the lot/batch: March, 2023- Purity test date: No data available- Consistency: Solid, powder- Colour: Blue STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL- Storage condition of test material: Test Item was stored at ambient temperature.TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING- Treatment of test material prior to testing: Test item was suspended in distilled water. The formulation was prepared fresh on the day of dosing. OTHER SPECIFICS: Safety Precautions: Safety precautions included use of protective clothing, gloves, masks and eye protection (glasses).
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL- Test Item: Aluminium, 2-(1,3-dihydro-3-oxo-5-sulfo-2H-indol-2-ylidene)-2,3-dihydro-3-oxo-1H-indole-5-sulfonic acid complex (CAS No. 16521-38-3) - Source of test material: Sustainability Support Services (Europe) AB, Sweden - Batch No. of test material: GA/BH/14-15/10/MS- Manufacturing Date: April, 2015- Expiration date of the lot/batch: March, 2023- Purity test date: No data available- Consistency: Solid, powder- Colour: Blue RADIOLABELLING INFORMATION (not applicable)- Radiochemical purity: N/A- Specific activity: N/A- Locations of the label: N/A- Expiration date of radiochemical substance: N/ASTABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL- Storage condition of test material: Test Item was stored at ambient temperature.- Stability under test conditions: No data available- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: No data available- Reactivity of the test substance with the solvent/vehicle of the cell culture medium: No data availableTREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING- Treatment of test material prior to testing: Test item was suspended in distilled water. The formulation was prepared fresh on the day of dosing. - Preliminary purification step (if any): No data available- Final dilution of a dissolved solid, stock liquid or gel: No data available- Final preparation of a solid: No data availableFORM AS APPLIED IN THE TEST (if different from that of starting material) : No data availableOTHER SPECIFICS: Safety Precautions: Safety precautions included use of protective clothing, gloves, masks and eye protection (glasses).

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS- Source: National Institute of Biosciences, Pune.- Females nulliparous and non-pregnant: yes- Age at study initiation: Female rats of the age of approximately 8 to 12 weeks old were used at the commencement of its dosing.- Weight at study initiation: Body weight range was 198.7 to 218.7 grams.Body weights at the start :FemaleMean : 206.53 g (= 100 %)Minimum : 198.7 g (- 3.79 %)Maximum : 218.7 g (+ 5.90 %)Total No. of animals : 12- Identification: Each female rat was individually identified by the picric acid marking.- Fasting period before study: Approximately 16 hours or more.- Housing: The rats were housed in polycarbonate cages.- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Rodent feed supplied by the Nutrivet Life Sciences, Pune, was provided ad libitum from individual feeders.- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Water was provided ad libitum from individual bottles attached to the cages. All water was from a local source and passed through the reverse osmosis membrane before use.- Acclimation period: 5 days.ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS- Temperature (°C): 20.6 to 23.2 degree centigrade.- Humidity (%): 55.1% to 58.6%- Air changes (per hr): Ten to fifteen air changes per hour.- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): An artificial light and dark cycle of 12 hours each was provided to the room.IN-LIFE DATES: 26-09-2016 to 15-10-2016

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Remarks:
(Distilled water)
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE- Concentration in vehicle: 300 mg/kg, 300 mg/kg, 2000 mg/kg and 2000 mg/kg- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): No data available- Justification for choice of vehicle: No data available - Lot/batch no. (if required): No data available - Purity: No data availableMAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 10 ml/kg body weight.DOSAGE PREPARATION (if unusual): No data availableCLASS METHOD (if applicable)- Rationale for the selection of the starting dose: No data available
Doses:
Dose Group I : 300 mg/kgDose Group I : 300 mg/kgDose Group II : 2000 mg/kgDose Group II : 2000 mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Three females were used at each step.
Control animals:
not specified
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days - Frequency of observations and weighing: Twice daily- Necropsy of survivors performed: Yes- Other examinations performed: Clinical Observations and General Appearance:Animals were observed for clinical signs, mortality and morbidity, until sacrifice.Onset, duration and severity of any sign were recorded. The clinical signs and mortality observations were conducted at immediately (0 to 5 minutes), 5, 10, 30, 60 minutes, 2, 4 and 6 hours on the day of dosing and once daily thereafter for 14 day. Daily observation was done as far as possible at the same time.Body weights:Individual animal body weights were recorded, before fasting, prior to administration of the test item (fasting body weights), weekly thereafter and at termination on day 14. Weight changes were calculated and recorded.Gross Pathology:Necropsy was performed on all animals at the end of the study period on day 15. Macroscopic examination of all the orifices, cavities and tissues were made and the findings were recorded. All animals surviving the study period were sacrificed by the carbon dioxide asphyxiation technique. Histopathology:No gross abnormalities were observed in animals sacrificed terminally hence, no histopathology was performed.
Statistics:
No data

Results and discussion

Preliminary study:
No data
Effect levels
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50 cut-off
Effect level:
5 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: no mortality was observed
Mortality:
Group I Step I :Animals treated at the dose level of 300 mg/kg body weight: All animals survived through the study period of 14 days.Group I Step II :Animals treated at the dose level of 300 mg/kg body weight: All animals survived through the study period of 14 days.Group II Step I :Animals treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight: All animals survived through the study period of 14 days.Group II Step II :Animals treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight: All animals survived through the study period of 14 days.
Clinical signs:
Group I Step I :Animals treated at the dose level of 300 mg/kg body weight did not result in any signs of toxicity during the study period of 14 days. Group I Step II :Animals treated at the dose level of 300 mg/kg body weight did not result in any signs of toxicity during the study period of 14 days.Group II Step I :Animals treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight did not result in any signs of toxicity during the study period of 14 days. Group II Step II :Animals treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight did not result in any signs of toxicity during the study period of 14 days.
Body weight:
Group I Step I (300 mg/kg) - Percent body weight gain after 7 days and 14 days was found to be 4.99% and 13.11% respectively. Group I Step II (300 mg/kg) - Percent body weight gain after 7 days and 14 days was found to be 5.24% and 14.11% respectively. Group II Step I (2000 mg/kg) - Percent body weight gain after 7 days and 14 days was found to be 4.51% and 12.15% respectively. Group II Step II (2000 mg/kg) - Percent body weight gain after 7 days and 14 days was found to be 3.06% and 10.47% respectively.
Gross pathology:
Gross pathological examination did not reveal any abnormalities in animals from 300 mg/kg and 2000 mg/kg dose groups.
Other findings:
No data available

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table No. I

Summary of Clinical Signs of Toxicity and Mortality

Test System : Sprague Dawley Rat

Sex : Female

Group I :   

Step

No.

Dose mg/kg

Observed Signs

Total Number of

Animals

Animal Nos.

Period of signs in days

From - to

Mortality

I

300

No clinical signs observed

3

1 - 3

0 to 14

0/3

 

Group I :

Step

No.

Dose mg/kg

Observed Signs

Total Number of

Animals

Animal Nos.

Period of signs in days

From - to

Mortality

II

300

No clinical signs observed

3

4 - 6

0 to 14

0/3

 

Group II :

Step

No.

Dose mg/kg

Observed Signs

Total Number of

Animals

Animal Nos.

Period of signs in days

From - to

Mortality

I

2000

No clinical signs observed

3

7 - 9

0 to 14

0/3

 

Group II :

Step

No.

Dose mg/kg

Observed Signs

Total Number of

Animals

Animal Nos.

Period of signs in days

From - to

Mortality

II

2000

No clinical signs observed

3

10 - 12

0 to 14

0/3

 

 

Table No.II

Mean Body Weight and Percent Body Weight Gain (g)

Test System : Sprague Dawley Rat

Sex : Female

Group I :

Step

No.

Dose

(mg/kg body weight)

 

Before Fasting Body weight

Body weight Day 7

% body weight gain

day 0-7

Body weight Day 14

% body weight gain

day 7- 14

% body weight gain

day 0- 14

I

300

Mean

203.53

213.70

4.99

230.23

7.73

13.11

± SD

2.56

2.75

0.15

3.75

0.52

0.47

 

 

Group I :

Step

No.

Dose

(mg/kg body weight)

 

Before Fasting Body weight

Body weight Day 7

% body weight gain

day 0-7

Body weight Day 14

% body weight gain

day 7- 14

% body weight gain

day 0- 14

II

300

Mean

200.83

211.37

5.24

229.17

8.42

14.11

± SD

2.38

2.71

0.14

3.47

0.58

0.74

 

 

Group II :

Step

No.

Dose

(mg/kg body weight)

 

Before Fasting Body weight

Body weight Day 7

% body weight gain

day 0-7

Body weight Day 14

% body weight gain

day 7- 14

% body weight gain

day 0- 14

I

2000

Mean

205.63

214.90

4.51

230.60

7.31

12.15

± SD

3.04

2.72

1.10

3.05

0.54

1.73

 

 

Group II :

Step

No.

Dose

(mg/kg body weight)

 

Before Fasting Body weight

Body weight Day 7

% body weight gain

day 0-7

Body weight Day 14

% body weight gain

day 7- 14

% body weight gain

day 0- 14

II

2000

Mean

216.10

222.70

3.06

238.70

7.19

10.47

± SD

2.88

2.56

0.37

2.91

1.10

1.53

 

 

Table No.III

Summary of Gross Pathological Findings

Test System : Sprague Dawley Rat

Sex : Female

Group I :

Step

No.

Dose

mg/kg

Animal Numbers

Animal Fate

Gross Pathological Findings

I

300

1 - 3

TS

No abnormality detected

 

Group I :

Step

No.

Dose

mg/kg

Animal Numbers

Animal Fate

Gross Pathological Findings

II

300

4 - 6

TS

No abnormality detected

Group II :

 

Step No.

Dose

mg/kg

Animal Numbers

Animal Fate

Gross Pathological Findings

I

2000

7 - 9

TS

No abnormality detected

 

Group II :  

Step No.

Dose

mg/kg

Animal Numbers

Animal Fate

Gross Pathological Findings

II

2000

10 - 12

TS

No abnormality detected

 TS = Terminal Sacrifice

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: not classified
Conclusions:
The lethal concentration (LD50-Cut-off value) value for acute oral toxicity test was considered to be 5000 mg/kg bw,when female Sprague Dawley rats were treated with test chemical Aluminium, 2-(1,3-dihydro-3-oxo-5-sulfo-2H-indol-2-ylidene)-2,3-dihydro- 3-oxo-1H-indole-5-sulfonic acid complex (CAS No. 16521-38-3) orally via gavage according to OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method).
Executive summary:

The acute oral toxicity profile of Aluminium, 2-(1,3-dihydro-3-oxo-5-sulfo-2H-indol-2-ylidene)-2,3-dihydro-3-oxo-1H-indole-5-sulfonic acid complex (CAS No. 16521-38-3) in Sprague Dawley rats according to OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method).Initially, three female animals were treated at the dose level of 300 mg/kg body weight of the test item (Step - I). Administration of the test item at 300 mg/kg did not result in any signs of toxicity and mortality at 24 hours after the dosing. As no mortality was observed at 24 hours after the dosing, three female animals were added to the study and treated with the same dose of 300 mg/kg of the test item (Step - II). Administration of the test item at 300 mg/kg did not result in any signs of toxicity and mortality after the dosing.No mortality was observed at 300 mg/kg dose group, hence additional three female animals were treated with the higher dose of 2000 mg/kg of the test item (Step - I). Administration of the test item at 2000 mg/kg did not result in any signs of toxicity and mortality after the dosing. As no mortality were observed at 24 hours after the dosing, hence additional three female animals were treated with the higher dose of 2000 mg/kg of the test item (Step - II). Administration of the test item at 2000 mg/kg did not result in any signs of toxicity and mortality after the dosing.Gross pathological examination did not reveal any abnormalities in animals from 300 mg/kg and 2000 mg/kg dose groups.Hence, The lethal concentration (LD50-Cut-off value) value for acute oral toxicity test was considered to be 5000 mg/kg bw,when female Sprague Dawley rats were treated with test chemical Aluminium, 2-(1,3-dihydro-3-oxo-5-sulfo-2H-indol-2-ylidene)-2,3-dihydro- 3-oxo-1H-indole-5-sulfonic acid complex (CAS No. 16521-38-3) orally via gavage according to OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method).