Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 944-572-8 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
Based on the available data from the OECD 421 study, fertility and reproductive performance of the parental animals were adversely affected by treatment with the test substance. In addition, also developmental toxicity was evident in the offspring.
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- 30 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
The test substance was given daily as an oily solution to groups of 10 male and 10 female Wistar rats (F0 animals) by stomach tube at doses of 30, 100 and 300 mg/kg body weight/day (mg/kg bw/d).Control animals (10 male and 10 female Wistar rats) were dosed daily with the vehicle only (corn oil). The study was conducted according to OECD 421 guideline and GLP (BASF, 2014) with some additional examinations. The duration of treatment covered a 2-week premating and mating period in both sexes, about three weeks postmating in males, and the entire gestation period as well as approximately 4 days of the lactation period in females with litters, and 4 weeks of postmating period in non-pregnant females.
Observations
After 2 weeks of premating treatment the F0 animals were mated to produce F1 generation pups. Mating pairs were from the same test group. Mating was discontinued as soon as sperm was detected in the vaginal smear. F0 animals were examined for their reproductive performance including determination of the number of implantation sites and the calculation of postimplantation loss for all F0 females.
Food consumption of the F0 parents was determined once weekly during premating. In dams food consumption was determined for gestation days 0 - 7, 7 - 14, 14 - 20 and lactation days 1 - 4.
Body weights of F0 parents were determined once a week, in males throughout the study and in females during premating. During gestation and lactation period, F0 females were weighed on gestation days (GD) 0, 7, 14 and 20, on the day of parturition (postnatal day [PND] 0) and on PND 4.
The pups were sexed and examined for macroscopically evident changes on PND 0. They were weighed on PND 1 and on PND 4. Their viability was recorded. At necropsy on PND 4, all pups were sacrificed with CO2, under isoflurane anesthesia, and examined macroscopically for external and visceral findings.
Clinico-chemical and hematological examinations were performed of allanimals in each sex and dose-grouptowards the end of the administration period.
Various sperm parameters (motility, sperm head count, morphology) were assessed in the F0 generation males at scheduled sacrifice or after appropriate staining.
All F0 parental animals were sacrificed by decapitation,under isoflurane anesthesia, and were assessed by gross pathology. Weights of selected organs were recorded and a histopathological examination was performed.
Results
Analysis
The various analyses:
- Demonstrated the stability of the test substance in corn oil over a period of 7 days at room temperature.
- Verified correct concentrations of the test substance preparations.
Effects
The following test substance-related adverse effects/findings were noted:
300mg/kg bw/d
F0 PARENTAL ANIMALS
CLINICAL EXAMINATIONS/ REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE/CLINICAL PATHOLOGY/ PATHOLOGY
- Decreased food consumption in the males during the whole premating period (up to 24% below control)
- Decreased body weights in the males on premating days 7 - 13 (up to 7% below control), during the whole mating period (about 7% below control) and during the whole postmating period (up to 13% below control), reduced body weight gain in accordance
- Indications of regenerative anemia, such as decreased red blood cell (RBC) counts, hemoglobin and hematocrit values, as well as increased relative reticulocyte counts in rats of both sexes
- Prolonged prothombin time in males
- Decreased mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and increased mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) in females
- Indications ofaltered liver cell metabolism such as increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activities in rats of both sexes, increased creatinine values and decreased cholesterol values in males, increased triglyceride and total bilirubin values in females
- No copulation in 2/10 pairs, decreased mating index (80 vs. 100% in control)
- No pregnancies at all in females with confirmed copulation (8/10)
- Increased incidences of abnormal sperm and decreased total sperm head counts (-48 %) in the cauda epididymidis
- Decrease in absolute weight of testes (-28%), epididymides (-38%), prostate (-65%) and seminal vesicle (-84%) in male animals
- Decrease in relative weight of the epididymides (-29%), prostate (-60%) and seminal vesicle (-81%) in male animals
- Decrease in absolute (-48%) and relative (-46%) ovary weight in female animals
- Increase in absolute adrenal gland weight (+51%) in males and absolute liver weight (+14%) in female animals
- Increase in relative weight of adrenal glands (+75%/+21%), liver (+22%/+29%), and pituitary gland (+32%/+26%) of male and female animals
- Macroscopically reduced size of eight testes and epididymides and nine prostates and seminal vesicles in male animals
- Macroscopically reduced size of nine ovaries in female animals
- Moderate tubular degeneration in two males and slight reduction of tubular size in the left testis in seven males
- Slight to extreme oligospermia in four males and minimal to slight debris in seminiferous tubules in the left epididymis in three males
- Minimal to moderate increase of atretic follicles in eight females, inactivity of interstitial cells in the ovaries in six females, increased number of cyst(s) in nine females, and decreased number of corpora lutea in nine females
F1 PUPS
CLINICAL EXAMINATIONS/ GROSS FINDINGS
- No pregnancies, no pups delivered
100 mg/kg bw/d
F0 PARENTAL ANIMALS
CLINICAL EXAMINATIONS/ REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE/CLINICAL PATHOLOGY/ PATHOLOGY
- Decreased total sperm head counts (-23 %) in the cauda epididymidis
- Decrease in absolute weight of the epididymides (-13%), prostate (-35%) and seminal vesicle (-47%) in male animals
- Decrease in relative weight of prostate (-32%) and seminal vesicle (-44%) in male animals
- Increase in relative weight of pituitary gland (+26%) of male animals
- Macroscopically reduced size of two prostates and seminal vesicles in male animals
- Minimal to slight reduction of tubular size in the left testis in six males and minimal debris in seminiferous tubules in the left epididymis in one male
- Moderate increase of atretic follicles and decreased number of corpora lutea in the ovaries in one female
- Decreased number of implantation sites (5.9** [**:p≤0.01] vs. 12.3 implants in control)
- Increased post-implantation loss (46.5% vs. 3.9% in control)
F1 PUPS
CLINICAL EXAMINATIONS/ GROSS FINDINGS
- Decreased mean number of delivered pups (4.1** [**:p≤0.01] vs. 11.8 pups per litter)
- Increased number of dead/cannibalized pups (6 vs. 1 in control), resulting in decreased viability index (about 14% below control)
- Skew of sex ratio towards female sex (33.3% males vs. 66.7% females on PND 0)
30 mg/kg bw/d
F0 PARENTAL ANIMALS
CLINICAL EXAMINATIONS/ REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE/CLINICAL PATHOLOGY/ PATHOLOGY
- Decreased total sperm head counts (- 13 %) in the cauda epididymidis
- Decrease in absolute and relative weight of the seminal vesicle (-16%/-18%) and increase in relative pituitary gland weight (+17%)
F1 PUPS
CLINICAL EXAMINATIONS/ GROSS FINDINGS
- No test substance-related adverse findings
Conclusion
Under the conditions of this OECD 421 combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test in Wistar rats the following NOAEL (no observed adverse effect level) were determined:
TheNOAEL for general, systemic toxicity was 100 mg/kg bw/d for the F0 males and females based on anemia and altered liver cell metabolism at 300 mg/kg bw/d.
No NOAEL for fertility was determined for the F0 parental males because a dose-dependent decrease in the number of sperm in thecauda epididymidis as well as a change in relative organ weights of seminal vesicles and pituitary glands were noted at all tested dose levels of 30 mg/kg bw/d and above. Fertility and reproductive performance of F0 parental females were unaffected at 30 mg/kg bw/d. Fertility and reproductive performance were distinctly impaired at 100 mg/kg bw/d, while outright infertility was the result of the exposure to 300 mg/kg bw/d. A putative NOAEL for fertility was set at 10 mg/kg bw/d (see discussion below).
The NOAEL for developmental toxicity in the F1 offspring was 30 mg/kg bw/d, based on fetal and pup mortality at 100 mg/kg bw/d.
In order to establish a putative NOAEL for DNEL derivation, a safety factor of 3 (see discussion of DNEL derivation in IUCLID and chemical safety report) was chosen for the following reasons:
- The sperm head counts in the cauda epididymidis were within the biological variance of the Wistar rat obtained in the laboratory conducting the study. They ranged from a mean of 298 to 688 (TS/gT [Mio/g]) in the data available from more than 30 control groups where this parameter was examined in the years from 2008 to 2013. Thus both the count of the low (422) and mid dose (372) of this study (control: 486) are within this biological range and the decreased sperm head counts in the cauda epididymidis had no effect on the pregnancy outcomes of the low (9/10 females pregnant) and mid dose (10/10 females pregnant) group.
- The decreased absolute weight of the seminal vesicles (mean: 1.56 g in the control group males vs. mean: 1.307* g (*: p<= 0.05) in the low dose group males) were within the biological variance of the Wistar rat obtained in the laboratory conducting the study. They ranged from a mean of 0.905 g to 1.454 g taking into account the values of more than 40 control groups from the years 2006 to 2016. These controls include three OECD 421/422 studies where the controls ranged from 1.293 g to 1.402 g. The absolute weights of the seminal vesicles in the controls of the current study were thus rather high.
- The decreased relative weight of the seminal vesicles (mean %: 0.38 in the control group males vs. mean %: 0.311** (**: p<= 0.01) in the low dose group males) was within the biological variance of the Wistar rat obtained in the laboratory conducting the study. They ranged from a mean of 0.263 % to 0.39 % taking into account the values of more than 40 control groups from the years 2006 to 2016. This includes three OECD 421/422 studies where the controls ranged from 0.334 % to 0.366 %.
- The increase in relative pituitary gland weight (mean %: 0.002 in the control group males vs. mean %: 0.003* (*: p<= 0.05) in the low dose group males) was within the biological variance of the Wistar rat obtained in the laboratory conducting the study. They ranged from a mean of 0.002 % to 0.004 % taking into account the values of more than 40 control groups from the years 2006 to 2016.
Based
on the information presented above we believe, that the safety factor of
3 is sufficiently conservative to derive the putative NOAEL for DNEL
derivation. Thus the putative NOAEL for fertility is set at 10 mg/kg
bw/d.
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
Based on the available data from the OECD 421 study, fertility and reproductive performance of the parental animals were adversely affected by treatment with the test substance. In addition, also developmental toxicity was evident in the offspring.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 30 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Under the conditions of this OECD 421 combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test in Wistar rats the following NOAEL (no observed adverse effect level) were determined:
TheNOAEL for general, systemic toxicity was 100 mg/kg bw/d for the F0 males and females based on anemia and altered liver cell metabolism at 300 mg/kg bw/d.
No NOAEL for fertility was determined for the F0 parental males because a dose-dependent decrease in the number of sperm in thecauda epididymidis as well as a change in relative organ weights of seminal vesicles and pituitary glands were noted at all tested dose levels of 30 mg/kg bw/d and above. Fertility and reproductive performance of F0 parental females were unaffected at 30 mg/kg bw/d. Fertility and reproductive performance were distinctly impaired at 100 mg/kg bw/d, while outright infertility was the result of the exposure to 300 mg/kg bw/d.
The NOAEL for developmental toxicity in the F1 offspring was 30 mg/kg bw/d, based on fetal and pup mortality at 100 mg/kg bw/d.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available OECD 421 study, a classification with R60 (May impair ferility, Cat. 2) and R61 (May cause harm to the unborn child, Cat. 2) according to DSD-DPD and a classification as toxic to reproduction with Cat. 1B Fertility and Development (H360) according to CLP is warranted.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.