Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
13 November to 05 December 2012
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP study conducted according to relevant testing guidelines, with no deviations.

Data source

Reference Type:
study report
Report date:

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
according to guideline
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
according to guideline
EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
GLP compliance:
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
High molecular weight adducts of Fatty acids, C18-unsatd dimers and trimers with amines, polyethylenepoly-, triethylenetetramine fraction
High molecular weight adducts of Fatty acids, C18-unsatd dimers and trimers with amines, polyethylenepoly-, triethylenetetramine fraction
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
Low Molecular weight adducts of Fatty acids, C16-18 sat. C18 unsat., linear, dimers, with Amines, polyethylenepoly-, triethylenetetramine fraction
Low Molecular weight adducts of Fatty acids, C16-18 sat. C18 unsat., linear, dimers, with Amines, polyethylenepoly-, triethylenetetramine fraction
Constituent 3
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Amines, polyethylenepoly-, triethylenetetramine fraction
EC Number:
EC Name:
Amines, polyethylenepoly-, triethylenetetramine fraction
Cas Number:
Molecular formula:
C6H18N4, C8H20N4, C8H20N4, C6H18N4
Amines, polyethylenepoly-, triethylenetetramine fraction
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report):OLEIC DimerFA TETA PAA
- Physical state:Yellow-red, transparent, viscous liquid
- Analytical purity: 8% free amine
- Storage condition of test material:Room temperature (15°C to 30°C)
-Sponsor batch: BB100860V1

In vivo test system

Test animals

Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
The test animals were nulliparous, non-pregnant female CBA/CaCrl mice, obtained from Charles River (UK) Ltd., Margate. The animals were 8 to 9 weeks old on Day 1 of the study, and weighed 17 to 20 g on the day prior to dosing. Individual body weights were within ± 20% of the mean body weight. The animals were group housed during acclimatisation and individually housed from Day –1. Mice were fed SQC(E) Rat and Mouse Maintenance Diet No 1, from Special Diets Services Ltd, Witham, UK ad libitum. Mains water was provided ad libitum via cage-mounted bottles. The temperature was maintained at 20 to 24°C, and the humidity was 45 to 65%. Lighting was provided on a 12 hour cycle, and there were 15 to 20 air changes per hour.
The mice were acclimatised for 8 to 9 days.

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
0%, 10% w/v, 25% w/v, 50% w/v
No. of animals per dose:
Details on study design:
A preliminary study was conducted in one mouse to determine the systemic toxicity/irritancy potential of the test material. The mouse was treated by daily application of 25 µL of the test article at the maximum suitable concentration (50% w/v in acetone in olive oil) to the dorsal surface of each ear for three consecutive days (Days 1, 2 and 3), and observed daily for five days from the initiation of treatment. Death or signs of systemic toxicity/excessive irritation were not observed, therefore concentrations of 10%, 25% and 50% were selected for the main study.

The test material or control (0.025 mL/pinna) was applied directly to the outer surface of both pinnae. Applications were made once daily on Days 1, 2 and 3. On Day 6 the mice were placed in a warming cabinet in order to dilate the peripheral blood vasculature and thus facilitate intravenous dosing. Each mouse was transferred to a cylindrical restrainer. A plastic syringe and fine gauge hypodermic needle were used to administer 0.25 mL phosphate buffered saline incorporating 20 μCi of tritiated ³H-methyl thymidine (³HTdR) into a tail vein of each mouse by slow bolus injection. After this treatment the mice were returned to their cages. Approximately five hours after intravenous injection of the ³HTdR, all mice were killed by exposure to a rising concentration of carbon dioxide. Killing was organised to minimise the interval between death and the recovery of the auricular lymph nodes to no more than fifteen minutes. Once death was confirmed, a mid-line incision from the lower jaw to the sternum was made and the cervical structures were exposed by reflecting the skin. The auricular lymph nodes were located and removed, any connective tissue was removed from the capsule of the nodes. The auricular lymph nodes of all mice from each dose group were placed into petri dishes containing 5 mL phosphate buffered saline.

The test result is not valid for those groups producing an SI value of 3.0 or more when the sites of application have shown excessive irritation and for those groups that have shown indications of systemic toxicosis. The test article is regarded as a sensitiser when the maximum value of the SI is 3.0 or above. The test article is classified as a non sensitiser when the maximum value of the SI is less than 3.0. (This result is unchanged by observations of irritation at sites of application of the test formulation).

Formulations were prepared fresh in 80% v/v acetone in olive oil, on Days 1, 2 and 3. The formulations were stored at room temperature, in sealed, air-tight containers prior to dosing. They were mixed by multiple inversion of the containers prior to administration to ensure homogeneity. Concentrations of test article were expressed gravimetrically and in terms of test article received (without regard to purity or active content). An aliquot of 5.75 mL phosphate buffered saline was mixed with 0.5 mL ³HTdR shortly before intravenous dosing commenced on Day 6. The final product contained ³HTdR at 80 μCi/mL.

Treated mice were observed twice daily on Days 1 to 5 and once on Day 6 for clinical signs of reaction to treatment or for irritation. Routine health checks were made twice daily during the acclimatisation and study periods. Mice were weighed the day prior to dosing, and on Day 6 prior to ³HTdR administration.
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
Not required.

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
Positive control tests are conducted every 6 months at the test facility. The results from the most recent test (October 2012) gave stimulations indices of 1.6, 2.6 and 12.1 for α-Hexylcinnamaldehyde concentrations of 5%, 10% and 25%, respectively.

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Test group / Remarks:
50 %
Test group / Remarks:
25 %
Key result
Test group / Remarks:
10 %
Remarks on result:
other: The stimulation indices were 9.9, 9.0 and 8.1 for concentrations of 10%, 25% and 50%, respectively.
other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
Remarks on result:
other: Mean DPM were 2819, 27890, 25378 and 22791 for the vehicle control, and 10%, 25% and 50% test material concentrations, respectively.

Any other information on results incl. tables

There were no deaths during the study, and no clinical signs of toxicity were observed. No signs of irritation were noted at the test sites. Greasy fur to the head and neck was noted in all animals from Day 1 to Day 6. There were no effects of treatment on body weight.

Table 1. Scintillation counts and stimulation indices

Sample identity

No. sites yielding lymph nodes

Disintegrations per minute* (DPM)

Disintegrations per minute per node (DLM)

Stimulation Index (SI)

Scintillation fluid with 5% w/v trichloroacetic acid





Vehicle control





Test article, 10% w/v





Test article, 25% w/v





Test article, 50% w/v





* All scintillation counts corrected for the blank

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Based on the results of the study, the test material is considered to be a skin sensitiser.
Executive summary:

The skin sensitisation potential of OLEIC_DimerFA_TETA_PAA was evaluated in the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA), according to OECD Test Guideline 429 and GLP. A preliminary study was conducted in one female CBA/Ca mouse to determine concentrations to be used for the main study. Female CBA/Ca mice (4 per group) were used in the main study. The test material was prepared for administration at 0, 10, 25 and 50% w/v in 80% v/v acetone in olive oil. The test material or vehicle control was applied to the outer aspect of the auditory pinnae of the mice once daily on Days 1, 2 and 3. On Day 6 a 20 µCi dose of tritiated ³H-methyl thymidine was injected intraveneously into each mouse. Approximately 5 hours later the auricular lymph nodes were recovered from each animal. Nodes from the same treatment group were pooled and suspensions of the cellular components of the lymph nodes were prepared in 5% w/v trichloroacetic acid and processed through a scintillation counter. The DPM value (disintegrations per minute in a ten minute period) was used to calculate the DLM value (disintegrations per minute per lymph node). The DLM value of each test group was divided by the DLM value for the vehicle control group to provide the Stimulation Index for each group. Stimulation indices of 9.9, 9.0 and 8.1 were obtained for test concentrations 10%, 25% and 50%, respectively. Therefore, OLEIC_DimerFA_TETA_PAA is considered to be a skin sensitiser in the LLNA. On the basis of these results, OLEIC_DimerFA_TETA_PAA requires classification as a Category 1 Skin Sensitiser according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.