Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2009-07-07 - 2009-07-21
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Justification for type of information:
Category Hypothesis

This category covers Spinel Type Minerals: The spinels are any of a class of minerals of the general chemical formula XY2O4 which crystallize into the cubic (isometric) crystal system, with the oxide anions arranged in a cubic close-packed lattice and the cations X and Y occupying some or all of the octahedral and tetrahedral sites in the lattice. X and Y can be divalent, trivalent or quadrivalent cations.

Through appropriate physical-chemical characterization of these various minerals it is possible to form one category from the Spinel Type Minerals MgAl2O4 (“Spinel”), FeAl2O4 (“Hercynite”), MnAl2O4 (“Galaxite”) and Pleonaste (iron rich spinel).

Even though such inorganic Spinel Type Minerals contain one or more than one heavy metal, the oxides of which may be potentially toxic and may cause toxic effects, these heavy metals in the Spinel Type Minerals behave differently from their oxides due to the special, i.e. spinel type, crystal matrix/structure.
Therefore, an appropriate toxicological evaluation of these inorganic Spinel Type Minerals can not be based on the properties of the isolated metal oxide(s).

This is due to the fact, that the heavy metals are so firmly bound within the spinel type lattice that they do lack any relevant solubility which is a precondition for any bioavailability.
This was in particular confirmed by solubility tests in (lung) surfactant and saliva/gastric/small intestine fluids.
A literature survey (see under assessment reports) describes and confirms an adequate and plausible description of the obvious biological inertness of Spinel Type Minerals.

Category justification

All Spinel Type Minerals comprise a spinel crystal structure which is devoid of any (practically relevant) water solubility and which is further characterized by very high melting points.

Spinel Type Minerals are also not bioavailable in vivo, which was confirmed by in vitro solubility tests in (lung) surfactant and saliva/gastric/small intestine fluids.
The Spinel Type Minerals are not skin and eye irritating in conducted in vitro tests which further confirms their biological inertness.

Their behaviour in water and biological systems is dominated by their insolubility and missing bioavailability. They constitute in general practically inert materials also with regard to their content of heavy metals. Thus, they also do not contribute to any ecological hazards.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2009

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Relative humidity in the animal room was between 45-100% for few hours.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
1302-67-6
Cas Number:
1302-67-6
IUPAC Name:
1302-67-6
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Spinel (Mg(AlO2)2)
EC Number:
215-105-9
EC Name:
Spinel (Mg(AlO2)2)
Cas Number:
1302-67-6
Molecular formula:
AlO2.1/2Mg
IUPAC Name:
215-105-9
Constituent 3
Reference substance name:
magnesium dialuminium oxide
IUPAC Name:
magnesium dialuminium oxide
Details on test material:
Batch no.: SP-AR78-20MY, batch 0825193518
Purity: > 99%
Expiration date: unlimited stability

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CBA
Sex:
female

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
dimethylformamide
Concentration:
10, 25, 50 %
No. of animals per dose:
4
Positive control substance(s):
hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
Experiment performed in June 2009.
Positive control substance: alpha-Hexylcinnamaldehyde
Vehicle: acetone:olive oil (4+1)
Test item concentration % (w/v) Group Measurement DPM DPM-BG a) number of lymph nodes DPM per lymph node b) S.I.
--- BG I 23 --- --- --- ---
--- BG II 19 --- --- --- ---
0 1 5842 5821 8 727.6
5 2 10450 10429 8 1303.6 1.79
10 3 12168 12147 8 1518.4 2.09
25 4 39834 39813 8 4976.6 6.84

BG = Background (1 ml 5% trichloroacetic acid) in duplicate
1 = Control Group
2-4 = Test Group
S.I. = Stimulation Index
a) = The mean value was taken from the figures BG I and BG II
b) = Since the lymph nodes of the animals of a dose group were pooled, DPM/node was determined by dividing the measured value by the number of lymph nodes pooled

In vivo (LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.17
Test group / Remarks:
2
Remarks on result:
other:
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.88
Test group / Remarks:
3
Parameter:
SI
Value:
1.42
Test group / Remarks:
4

Any other information on results incl. tables

Test item concentration % (w/w)

Group

Measurement DPM

Calculation

Result

DPM-BGa)

number of lymph nodes

DPM per lymph nodeb)

S.I.

---

BG I

29

---

---

---

---

---

BG II

26

---

---

---

---

---

1

4932

4905

8

613.1

 

10

2

5770

5743

8

717.8

1.17

25

3

9240

9213

8

1151.6

1.88

50

4

6996

6969

8

871.1

1.42

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:

Justification for read-across:
Spinel type minerals all have a spinel crystal structure, no water solubility and high melting points.
Their behaviour in water and biological systems is dominated by their insolubility and missing bioavailability. They constitute in general practically inert materials also regard to their content of heavy metals. Thus, they to not contribute to any ecological hazards.

They are also not bioavailable in vivo, which was confirmed by solubility tests in surfactant and stomach/small intestine fluids.
The Spinel type minerals are not skin irritating and not eye irritating in the conducted in vitro tests.

Physico-chemical properties of Spinel and Galaxite:

Spinel Galaxite
density (g/cm3): 3.55 4.23
melting-point (°C): 2135 1720
water-solubility: insoluble insoluble
bioavailability in the digestive tract: not bioavailable not bioavailable
bioavailability in the lung: not bioavailable not bioavailable

Conclusions:
Applying read-across it can be assumed that Galaxite is not a skin sensitiser.
Executive summary:

Justification for read-across:

Spinel type minerals all have a spinel crystal structure, no water solubility and high melting points. Their behaviour in water and biological systems is dominated by their insolubility and missing bioavailability. They constitute in general practically inert materials also regard to their content of heavy metals. Thus, they to not contribute to any ecological hazards. They are also not bioavailable in vivo, which was confirmed by solubility tests in surfactant and stomach/small intestine fluids. The Spinel type minerals are not skin irritating and not eye irritating in the conducted in vitro tests.

Physico-chemical properties of Spinel and Galaxite:

  Spinel  Galaxite 
density (g/cm3)  3.55  4.23 
melting-point (degree C) 2,135  1,720 
water-solubility  insoluble   insoluble
bioavailability in the digestive tract not bioavailable  not bioavailable 
bioavailability in the lung   not bioavailable

 not bioavailable

 crystal structure  spinel lattice  spinel lattice

Conclusions:

In order to study a possible contact allergenic potential of Spinel, three groups each of four female mice were treated daily with the test item at concentrations of 10, 25, and 50% (w/w) in dimethylformamide by topical application to the dorsum of each ear lobe (left and right) for three consecutive days. A control group of four mice was treated with the vehicle (dimethylformamide) only. Five days after the first topical application the mice were injected intravenously into a tail vein with radio-labelled thymidine (3H-methyl thymidine). Approximately five hours after intravenous injection, the mice were sacrificed, the draining auricular lymph nodes excised and pooled per group. Single cell suspensions of lymph node cells were prepared from pooled lymph nodes, which were subsequently washed and incubated with trichloroacetic acid overnight. The proliferative capacity of pooled lymph node cells was determined by the incorporation of3H-methyl thymidine measured in ab-scintillation counter.

All treated animals survived the scheduled study period and no signs of toxicity were observed.

A test item is regarded as a sensitiser in the LLNA if the exposure to one or more test concentration resulted in 3-fold or greater increase in incorporation of3HTdR compared with concurrent controls, as indicated by the Stimulation Index (S.I.). The estimated concentration of test item required to produce a S.I. of 3 is referred to as the EC3 value.

In this study Stimulation Indices of 1.17, 1.88, and 1.42 were determined with the test item at concentrations of 10, 25, and 50% in dimethylformamide. The EC3 value could not be calculated, since none of the tested concentrations induced an S.I. greater than 3.

Applying read-across it can be assumed that Galaxite is not a skin sensitiser.