Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 273-662-3 | CAS number: 68991-98-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from peer reviewed publication
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Salmonella mutagenicity tests. IV. Results from the testing of 300 chemicals
- Author:
- Zeiger, E., Anderson, B., Haworth, S., Lawlor, T., and Mortelmans, K.
- Year:
- 1 998
- Bibliographic source:
- Environ. Molec. Mutagen. Vol. 11 (Suppl 12) (1988) 1-158
- Reference Type:
- other: Authoritative data base
- Title:
- NTP Study ID:528732
- Author:
- NTP
- Year:
- 2 012
- Bibliographic source:
- NTP (National Toxicological Program)by Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry; Division of Toxicology/Toxicology Information Branch, 1600 Clifton Road NE, E-29, Atlanta, Georgia 30333
- Reference Type:
- other: Authoritative data base
- Title:
- GCID : 45725
- Author:
- ACToR Database
- Year:
- 2 011
- Bibliographic source:
- ACToR (Aggregated Computational Toxicology Resource):ZEIGER,E, ANDERSON,B, HAWORTH,S, LAWLOR,T AND MORTELMANS,K; SALMONELLA MUTAGENICITY TESTS: IV. RESULTS FROM THE TESTING OF 300 CHEMICALS; ENVIRON. MOL. MUTAGEN. 11(SUPPL.12):1-158, 1988
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Refer below principle
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test chemical Pigment yellow 100 (C.I. 19140) was studied for its ability to induce mutations in strains of Salmonella typhimurium.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Aluminium, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid complex
- EC Number:
- 235-428-9
- EC Name:
- Aluminium, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid complex
- Cas Number:
- 12225-21-7
- Molecular formula:
- C48H33AlN12O27S6
- IUPAC Name:
- aluminum tris(4-{[3-carboxy-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]diazenyl}benzenesulfonate)
- Details on test material:
- - Name of the test material: Pigment yellow 100
- IUPAC name: aluminum tris(4-{[3-carboxy-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]diazenyl}benzenesulfonate)
- Molecular formula: C48H33AlN12O27S6
- Molecular weight: 495.4038 g/mol
- Substance type: Organic
- Inchi: 1S/C16H12N4O9S2.Al/c21-15-13(18-17-9-1-5-11(6-2-9)30(24,25)26)14(16(22)23)19-20(15)10-3-7-12(8-4-10)31(27,28)29;/h1-8,13H,(H,22,23)(H,24,25,26)(H,27,28,29);/b18-17+;
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of the test material: Pigment yellow 100
- IUPAC name: aluminum tris(4-{[3-carboxy-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]diazenyl}benzenesulfonate)
- Molecular formula: C48H33AlN12O27S6
- Molecular weight: 495.4038 g/mol
- Substance type: Organic
- Purity: Labelled: 26%; Analyzed: 27%
- Inchi: 1S/C16H12N4O9S2.Al/c21-15-13(18-17-9-1-5-11(6-2-9)30(24,25)26)14(16(22)23)19-20(15)10-3-7-12(8-4-10)31(27,28)29;/h1-8,13H,(H,22,23)(H,24,25,26)(H,27,28,29);/b18-17+;
Method
- Target gene:
- Histidine
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA97 and TA98
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- No data
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- 10% and 30% HLI and RLI S-9 (9,000 g supernatant) fractions were prepared from Aroclor 1254-induced, male Sprague- Dawley rat and male Syrian hamster livers
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 100, 333, 1000, 3333, 6666 or 10000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test chemical was soluble in DMSO
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- For strains tested with S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- For strains TA100 and TA1535 tested in the absence of S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- For strains TA97 and TA1537 tested in the absence of S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine
- Remarks:
- For strain TA98 tested in the absence of S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 mins
- Exposure duration: 48 hrs
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 hrs
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data available
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): No data available
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): No data available
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): No data available
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): No data available
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Triplicate
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: No data available
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: No data available
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: No data available
- Determination of endoreplication: No data available
- Other: No data available
OTHER: No data available - Rationale for test conditions:
- No data
- Evaluation criteria:
- Evaluations were made at both the individual trial and overall chemical levels.
Individual trials were judged mutagenic (+), weakly mutagenic (+ W), questionable
(?), or nonmutagenic (-), depending on the magnitude of the increase of his+ revertants, and the shape of the dose-response. A trial was considered questionable (?) if the dose-response was judged insufficiently high to support a call of “ +W,” if only a single dose was elevated over the control, or if the increase seen was not dose related. The distinctions between a questionable mutagenic response and a nonmutagenic or weak mutagenic response, and between a weak mutagenic response and mutagenic response are highly subjective. It was not necessary for a response to reach two fold over background for a chemical to be judged mutagenic.
A chemical was judged mutagenic (+) or weakly mutagenic (+ W) if it produced a reproducible dose-related reponse over the solvent control in replicate trials. A chemical was judged questionable (?) if the results of individual trials were not reproducible, if increases in his+ revertants did not meet the criteria for a “+W” response, or if only single doses produced increases in his+ revertants in repeat trials.
Chemicals were judged nonmutagenic (-) if they did not meet the criteria for a mutagenic or questionable response. The chemicals were decoded by the chemical repository only after a determination had been made regarding their mutagenicity or nonmutagenicity. - Statistics:
- Mean ± SD
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA97 and TA98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: No data available
- Effects of osmolality: No data available
- Evaporation from medium: No data available
- Water solubility: No data available
- Precipitation: No data available
- Other confounding effects: No data available
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: All chemicals were tested initially in a toxicity assay to determine the appropriate dose range for the mutagenicity assay. The toxicity assay was performed using TA100. Toxic concentrations were those that produced a decrease in the number of his+ colonies, or a clearing in the density of the background lawn, or both.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Yes
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: No data available - Remarks on result:
- other: No mutagenic potential
Any other information on results incl. tables
Strain: TA100
Dose |
No Activation
(Negative) |
No Activation
(Negative) |
30% RLI
(Negative) |
30% HLI
(Negative) |
10% RLI
(Negative) |
10% HLI
(Negative) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protocol | Preincubation | Preincubation | Preincubation | Preincubation | Preincubation | Preincubation | ||||||
ug/Plate | Mean | ±SEM | Mean | ±SEM | Mean | ±SEM | Mean | ±SEM | Mean | ±SEM | Mean | ±SEM |
0 |
146 | 10 | 127 | 7.5 | 145 | 14.7 | 167 | 6.8 | 107 | 10.1 | 107 | 6.8 |
100 |
133 | 3.7 | 137 | 7.5 | 143 | 4.7 | 165 | 17.8 | 123 | 16.5 | 117 | 11.4 |
333 |
130 | 3.8 | 152 | 5 | 116 | 5 | 155 | 10.8 | 122 | 4.4 | 128 | 8.7 |
1000 |
146 | 6.1 | 136 | 6.7 | 127 | .7 | 116 | 16.5 | 130 | 13.5 | 117 | 13.1 |
3333 |
109 | 4 | 65 | 7.9 | 130 | 15.3 | 118 | 5.9 | 106 | 5.8 | 85 | 8.7 |
6666 |
16 | .7 | 75 | 11.4 | 53 | 8.9 | ||||||
10000 |
37 | 9 | 65 | 8.2 | 61 | 12.6 | ||||||
Positive Control | 604 | 4 | 550 | 21.1 | 478 | 14.7 | 529 | 14.2 | 515 | 46 | 548 | 52.7 |
Strain: TA1535
Dose |
No Activation
(Negative) |
No Activation
(Negative) |
30% RLI
(Negative) |
30% HLI
(Negative) |
10% RLI
(Negative) |
10% HLI
(Negative) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protocol | Preincubation | Preincubation | Preincubation | Preincubation | Preincubation | Preincubation | ||||||
ug/Plate | Mean | ±SEM | Mean | ±SEM | Mean | ±SEM | Mean | ±SEM | Mean | ±SEM | Mean | ±SEM |
0 |
31 | 1 | 20 | .6 | 15 | 1.8 | 9 | 2 | 8 | .6 | 10 | 1.5 |
100 |
26 | 1.5 | 20 | 1.5 | 14 | 1.9 | 10 | 1.8 | 11 | 1.2 | 12 | 2 |
333 |
30 | 5.2 | 16 | .6 | 16 | 2.2 | 8 | 1.2 | 7 | 2.5 | 7 | .9 |
1000 |
30 | 4 | 25 | 6.9 | 15 | 1.9 | 8 | 1.5 | 9 | .9 | 8 | .9 |
3333 |
24 | 3.7 | 15 | 2.5 | 11 | 1.2 | 8 | 3.1 | 9 | 2.7 | 6 | 1.5 |
6666 |
14 | 2.6 | 6 | .9 | 6 | .3 | ||||||
10000 |
21 | 1.9 | 13 | 1.9 | 7 | .7 | ||||||
Positive Control | 357 | 22.3 | 499 | 21.5 | 218 | 6.6 | 388 | 17.1 | 121 | 8.4 | 219 | 4.6 |
Strain: TA1537
Dose |
No Activation
(Negative) |
30% RLI
(Negative) |
30% HLI
(Negative) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Protocol | Preincubation | Preincubation | Preincubation | |||
ug/Plate | Mean | ±SEM | Mean | ±SEM | Mean | ±SEM |
0 |
8 | .7 | 14 | 1.5 | 15 | .6 |
100 |
6 | 1.5 | 11 | 1.7 | 12 | 3.5 |
333 |
10 | 1.9 | 15 | 1.8 | 12 | 1.9 |
1000 |
11 | 1.8 | 12 | .6 | 10 | .3 |
3333 |
6 | .6 | 9 | 1.5 | 6 | 0 |
10000 |
5 | 1.2 | 8 | 1.9 | 4 | 0 |
Positive Control | 309 | 5 | 41 | 2.3 | 46 | 3.3 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Pigment yellow 100 is not mutagenic to the Salmonella typhimurium TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA97 and TA98 in the presence and absence of rat and hamster liver S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
- Executive summary:
Pigment yellow 100 was studied for its ability to induce mutations in strains of Salmonella typhimurium.
The test compound was dissolved in DMSO and was tested at concentration of 0, 100, 333, 1000, 3333, 6666 or 10000 µg/plate using Salmonella typhimurium TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA97 and TA98 in the presence and absence of 10 % and 30 % rat and hamster liver S9 metabolic activation system. Preincubation assay was performed with a preicubation for 20 mins. The plates were observed for histidine independence after 2 days incubation period. Concurrent solvent and positive controls were included in the study.
Pigment yellow 100 is not mutagenic to the Salmonella typhimurium TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA97 and TA98 in the presence and absence of rat and hamster liver S9 metabolic activation system and hence it is not likely to classify as a gene mutant in vitro.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.