Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 237-509-4 | CAS number: 13821-20-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- Study initiation date : 31/10/2013, study completion date : 12/05/2014
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- The concentrations of the test substance were determined for the replicates with alga inoculums at the beginning and the end of the test. Before sampling, separation of algae from the test medium was made by syringe filters. For the extra replicates, every 24 hours after the test initiation, samples were taken for chemical analysis.
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- Range-finding test :
During the pre-test , a white precipitation was observed in the test solution of the treatment groups. The test substance (molecular formula: Li3AlF6) contains aluminum (Al) element, so the precipitation could result from the formation of low soluble salts, i.e., the reaction product between aluminum and anions present in the test water. The test solution of each treatment was prepared at its respective nominal concentration: a certain amount of the test substance was added into the alga medium, and stirred (via magnetic stirrer) for 72h at 500rpm in the dark followed by filtration using a 0.45μm nitrocellulose membrane. After filtration the test solutions were clear and no precipitation was visible.
Definitive test :
The test solution of each treatment was prepared at its respective nominal concentration: a certain amount of the test substance was added into the alga medium, and stirred (via magnetic stirrer) for 72h at 500rpm in the dark followed by filtration using a 0.45μm nitrocellulose membrane. After filtration the test solutions were clear and no precipitation was visible. - Test organisms (species):
- Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (previous names: Raphidocelis subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
- Details on test organisms:
- The test was performed with Pseudokichneriella subcapitata (ID: PS-IHB-130822) which was originally supplied by the institute of hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. This common species is one of the species recommended in the OECD TG 201. Ease of culturing and handling, sensitivity to a variety of chemical substances, and the extensive data base for this species make them suitable for acute toxicity testing.
For evaluation of the algal quality and experimental conditions, potassium dichromate was tested as a positive control twice in 2013 to demonstrate satisfactory test conditions. The 72h-ErC50 values of the test substance to Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata were 0.83mg/L (95% CI 0.76-0.89mg/L) and 0.84mg/L (95% CI 0.74-0.92mg/L) , respectively, which were within the defined range of 1.10±0.48mg/L, recommended based on an international ring test(Pattard et al, 2009).
The algae were inoculated in 250mL glass flasks with a concentration of 10E4 cells/mL, incubated during 3 days and then inoculated to another flask. At the beginning of the test, the algae were in the exponential growth phase when inoculated into the test solutions. - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- None
- Hardness:
- No data
- Test temperature:
- Measured from 22.9 to 23.5°C in the definitive study.
- pH:
- Measured from 8.15 to 9.52 in the blank control of the definitive study.
Measured from 6.73 to 8.07 in the treatment groups of the definitive study. - Dissolved oxygen:
- No data
- Salinity:
- No data
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Range-finding test: three nominal concentrations of 12.0mg/L, 60.0mg/L and 120mg/L were used. The concentrations were not measured.
Definitive study: five nominal concentrations of 3.00mg/L, 5.40mg/L, 9.60mg/L, 16.8mg/L and 30.0mg/L respectively corresponding to geometric mean measured concentrations of fluoride: 2.14mg/L, 3.66mg/L, 6.20mg/L, 10.4mg/L and 17.9mg/L and geometric mean measured concentrations of aluminum: 0.0437mg/L, 0.121mg/L, 0.148mg/L, 0.476mg/L and 1.58mg/L. - Details on test conditions:
- Algal medium : Analytical grade salts were dissolved in deionised water to obtain separate alga medium stock solutions. The stock solutions were filtrated with 0.22μm filter membrane and kept at 4°C. The alga medium was prepared by diluting the stock solutions in deionised water shortly before the test began.
Test vessels: 250 mL glass conical flasks
Conditions of exposure:
- Incubation: Each flask was capped with Parafilm and put in a culturing chamber by shaking at a speed of 130rpm.
- Duration: 72h;
- Temperature: 21-24℃;
- Illumination: the surface where the cultures are incubated should receive continuous, uniform fluorescent illumination at equivalent range of 4440–8880 lux for cool white light.
Procedure:
Test solutions: Before the initiation of the test, pH values of the respective test solution were adjusted to approximately 7.0 by 1M HCl. Three replicates were included for each treatment as well as six replicates for the blank control . Because of relatively large sampling volumes , one additional replicate with test solution was prepared for each concentration level for chemical analysis during the test. These replicates were treated identically to those used for testing but no alga inoculum was added.
Inoculation and incubation: An inoculum culture in the test medium was pre-cultured for 3 days before the start of the test under the test conditions. At the beginning of the test, the algae were in the exponential growth phase when inoculated to the test solutions and the density of the alga was 1.730×10E6/mL and 1.945x10E6/mL in the range-finding study and the definitive study respectively. In the range-finding study 1.73 mL of the alga culture and in the definitive study 1.54 mg/L of the alga culture were inoculated into 300mL of test solution for each treatment to obtain an initial cell density of the test solutions of about 10E4 /mL. 100mL of test solution was added into each of 250mL glass conical flasks.
Obervations and measurements: The density of alga cells in each flask was counted and light density in the culturing chamber was determined at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours.At the beginning of the test, pH values for the control and each treatment were measured using the remaining test solutions. At the end of the test, one vessel was randomly taken from the treatment group and the control group for pH measurement and microscopic observation of the algae. The concentrations of the test substance were determined at the beginning and the end of the test. Before sampling, separation of algae from the test medium was made by syringe filters.
Results of the range-finidng study to define the concentrations in the definitive study:
Mean specific growth rate inhibition at 72h :
40.9% at 12 mg/L
92.9% at 60 mg/L
91.6% at 120 mg/L. - Reference substance (positive control):
- no
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 16.1 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CI: 11.3 - 23.8 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- 6.96 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95 CI : 3.95 - 11.4 mg/L
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 7.57 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CI : 1.46 - 11 mg/L
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 2.44 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Remarks on result:
- other: 95% CI : 0.177 - 4.17 mg/L
- Details on results:
- - Analytical measurements of the test item:
In the definitive test, the measured concentrations of fluoride for all treatment groups varied within ± 20% from their initial ones (-7.00% -14.5%) and the measured concentrations of aluminum also varied within ± 20% (-9.06% -15.1%) except the exposure concentration at 5.40 mg/L.
Since the test substance is a metal compound consisting of several elements (Li, Al and F), the results were calculated using the nominal concentrations in order to reflect the toxicity of the test substance.
- Validity criteria:
- Exponential growth in the control : yes. The mean biomass increase in the control cultures was 116 , which is higher than the validity criterion of at least 16 within the 72-hour test period.
The mean coefficient of variation for section-by-section specific growth rates in the control cultures was 24.9%, which was below 35%.
The coefficient of variation of average specific growth rates during the whole test period in replicate control cultures was 2.43% which was below 7%.
The test fulfilled the above requirements and was therefore considered to be valid.
At the end of the test, no abnormal alga cells were observed in the control group by microscopic examination, but swollen cells were seen at the concentration of 30.0mg/L. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- For evaluation of the algal quality and experimental conditions, potassium dichromate was tested as a positive control twice in 2013 to demonstrate satisfactory test conditions. The 72h-ErC50 values of the test substance to Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata were 0.83mg/L (95% CI 0.76-0.89mg/L) and 0.84mg/L (95% CI 0.74-0.92mg/L) , respectively, which were within the defined range of 1.10±0.48mg/L, recommended based on an international ring test(Pattard et al, 2009).
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- OECD TG201 validity criteria fulfilled, see section "details on results"
- Conclusions:
- The toxicity results of the test substance to Pseudokichneriella subcapitata were the following: 72hErC50 = 16.1 mg/L and 72hErC10 = 7.57 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
The growth inhibition effect of Lithium cryolite to Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was determined in a 72 hours test according to the OECD TG 201 and under GLP.
During the pre-test, a white precipitation was observed in the test solution of the treatment groups. The test substance (molecular formula: Li3AlF6) contains aluminum (Al) element, so the precipitation could result from the formation of low soluble salts, i.e., the reaction product between aluminum and anions present in the test water. The test solution of each treatment was prepared at its respective nominal concentration: a certain amount of the test substance was added into the alga medium, and stirred (via magnetic stirrer) for 72h at 500 rpm in the dark followed by filtration using a 0.45μm nitrocellulose membrane.
Based on the results of the range-finding test, five nominal concentrations of 3.00 mg/L, 5.40 mg/L, 9.60 mg/L, 16.8 mg/L and 30.0mg/L (geometric mean measured concentrations of fluoride: 2.14 mg/L, 3.66 mg/L, 6.20 mg/L, 10.4 mg/L and 17.9 mg/L; those of aluminum: 0.0437 mg/L, 0.121 mg/L, 0.148 mg/L, 0.476 mg/L and 1.58 mg/L) were used in the definitive test. One control group of alga medium was run in addition to the treatment groups. Three replicates were included at each concentration as well as six replicates for the blank control .The test duration was 72h.
The mean biomass increase in the control cultures was 116, which is higher than the validity criterion of at least 16 within the 72-hour test period. The mean coefficient of variation for section-by-section specific growth rates in the control cultures was 24.9%, which was below 35%. The coefficient of variation of average specific growth rates during the whole test period in replicate control cultures was 2.43%, which was below 7%. Hence, the test was considered to be valid.
The measured concentrations of fluoride (F) analysed by ion chromatography (IC) for all treatment groups varied within ±20% from their initial concentrations (-7.00%-14.5%). The measured concentration of aluminum (Al) analysed by ICP-MS also varied within ±20% (-9.06%-15.1%) except the exposure concentration at 5.40 mg/L.
Since the test substance is a metal compound consisting of several elements (Li, Al and F), the results were calculated using the nominal concentrations in order to reflect the toxicity of the test substance. Based on average specific growth rate, the 72h-ErC10 value of the test substance to Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was 7.57 mg/L (95% confidence limits: 1.46 mg/L–11.0 mg/L), and the 72h-ErC50 was 16.1 mg/L (11.3 mg/L–23.8 mg/L) . Based on yield, the 72h-EyC10 was 2.44 mg/L (0.177 mg/L– 4.17 mg/L), and the 72h-EyC50 was 6.96 mg/L (3.95 mg/L–11.4 mg/L).
Reference
Table 1: The measured concentrations offluoride inthe testsolutionsin the definitive test
Group |
Measured Concentration (mg/L) |
Geometric mean (mg/L) |
72h vs.0h (%) |
||
0h |
72h |
||||
Blank Control |
ND2 |
ND2 |
— |
— |
|
Treatment Group (Nominal concentration,mg/L) |
3.00 |
2.00 |
2.29 |
2.14 |
14.5 |
5.40 |
3.59 |
3.74 |
3.66 |
4.18 |
|
9.60 |
6.21 |
6.20 |
6.20 |
-0.16 |
|
16.8 |
10.4 |
10.5 |
10.4 |
0.96 |
|
30.0 |
18.6 |
17.3 |
17.9 |
-7.00 |
LOD2=0.0665mg/L;ND2, not detected;“—”: not applicable
Table 2: The measured concentrations ofalumimun inthe testsolutionsin the definitive test
Group |
Measured Concentration (mg/L) |
Geometric mean (mg/L) |
72h vs.0h (%) |
||
0h |
72h |
||||
Blank Control |
0.00177 |
0.00543 |
— |
— |
|
Treatment Group (Nominal concentration,mg/L) |
3.00 |
0.0408 |
0.0468 |
0.0437 |
14.7 |
5.40 |
0.0974 |
0.151 |
0.121 |
54.8 |
|
9.60 |
0.138 |
0.159 |
0.148 |
15.1 |
|
16.8 |
0.496 |
0.457 |
0.476 |
-7.87 |
|
30.0 |
1.66 |
1.51 |
1.58 |
-9.06 |
“—”: not applicable
Table 3: Cell density ofPseudokirchneriella subcapitataexposed to the test substance for 72 hours in the definitive test
Group |
Cell density (cell/mL) |
|||||
0h |
24h |
48h |
72h |
|||
Blank Control |
1 |
10000 |
69360 |
302200 |
1014000 |
|
2 |
10000 |
71220 |
410600 |
1316000 |
||
3 |
10000 |
73730 |
362200 |
1207000 |
||
4 |
10000 |
71220 |
326900 |
1019000 |
||
5 |
10000 |
74300 |
291300 |
1101000 |
||
6 |
10000 |
76200 |
374000 |
1290000 |
||
Mean |
10000 |
72672 |
344533 |
1157833 |
||
CV (%) |
0 |
3.45 |
13.3 |
11.5 |
||
Treatment Group (Nominal concentration,mg/L) |
3.00 |
1 |
10000 |
73330 |
337000 |
894800 |
2 |
10000 |
68560 |
304400 |
844700 |
||
3 |
10000 |
72760 |
378900 |
946300 |
||
Mean |
10000 |
71550 |
340100 |
895267 |
||
CV (%) |
0 |
3.64 |
11.0 |
5.67 |
||
5.40 |
1 |
10000 |
76500 |
285300 |
795300 |
|
2 |
10000 |
64560 |
211400 |
776600 |
||
3 |
10000 |
71970 |
345100 |
794100 |
||
Mean |
10000 |
71010 |
280600 |
788667 |
||
CV (%) |
0 |
8.5 |
23.9 |
1.33 |
||
9.60 |
1 |
10000 |
68490 |
235900 |
436400 |
|
2 |
10000 |
71040 |
269100 |
428600 |
||
3 |
10000 |
71700 |
274000 |
446400 |
||
Mean |
10000 |
70410 |
259667 |
437133 |
||
CV (%) |
0 |
2.41 |
7.98 |
2.04 |
||
16.8 |
1 |
10000 |
40460 |
113900 |
151000 |
|
2 |
10000 |
38520 |
78180 |
95810 |
||
3 |
10000 |
27858 |
80250 |
116800 |
||
Mean |
10000 |
35613 |
90777 |
121203 |
||
CV (%) |
0 |
19.1 |
22.1 |
23.0 |
||
30.0 |
1 |
10000 |
11630 |
13660 |
14940 |
|
2 |
10000 |
11770 |
12310 |
16700 |
||
3 |
10000 |
11850 |
13800 |
15780 |
||
Mean |
10000 |
11750 |
13257 |
15807 |
||
CV (%) |
0 |
0.95 |
6.21 |
5.57 |
Table 4: Growth of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata for the blank control cultures in the definitive test
Replicate |
Average specific growth rate |
Yield |
|||||||||||
0-24h |
24-48h |
48-72h |
CV (%) for Section-by-section |
0-72h |
|||||||||
1 |
0.0807 |
0.0613 |
0.0504 |
23.8 |
0.0642 |
1004000 |
|||||||
2 |
0.0818 |
0.0730 |
0.0485 |
25.4 |
0.0678 |
1306000 |
|||||||
3 |
0.0832 |
0.0663 |
0.0502 |
24.8 |
0.0666 |
1197000 |
|||||||
4 |
0.0818 |
0.0635 |
0.0474 |
26.8 |
0.0642 |
1009000 |
|||||||
5 |
0.0836 |
0.0569 |
0.0554 |
24.2 |
0.0653 |
1091000 |
|||||||
6 |
0.0846 |
0.0663 |
0.0516 |
24.4 |
0.0675 |
1280000 |
|||||||
Mean |
0.0826 |
0.0646 |
0.0506 |
24.9 |
0.0659 |
1147833 |
|||||||
CV (%) for replicates |
1.72 |
7.47 |
7.91 |
- |
2.43 |
11.6 |
“—”: not applicable
Table 5: Growth ofPseudokirchneriella subcapitataexposed to the test substance in the definitive test
Treatment Group (Nominal concentration,mg/L) |
Average specific growth rate |
Yield |
||||||
0-24h |
24-48h |
48-72h |
0-72h |
72h- Inhibition (%) |
0-72h |
72h- Inhibition (%) |
||
3.00 |
1 |
0.0830 |
0.0635 |
0.0407 |
0.0624 |
5.31 |
884800 |
22.9 |
2 |
0.0802 |
0.0621 |
0.0425 |
0.0616 |
6.53 |
834700 |
27.3 |
|
3 |
0.0827 |
0.0688 |
0.0381 |
0.0632 |
4.10 |
936300 |
18.4 |
|
Mean |
0.0820 |
0.0648 |
0.0404 |
0.0624 |
5.31 |
885267 |
22.9 |
|
CV (%) |
1.87 |
5.45 |
5.48 |
1.28 |
— |
5.74 |
— |
|
5.40 |
1 |
0.0848 |
0.0548 |
0.0427 |
0.0608 |
7.74 |
785300 |
31.6 |
2 |
0.0777 |
0.0494 |
0.0542 |
0.0604 |
8.35 |
766600 |
33.2 |
|
3 |
0.0822 |
0.0653 |
0.0347 |
0.0608 |
7.74 |
784100 |
31.7 |
|
Mean |
0.0816 |
0.0565 |
0.0439 |
0.0607 |
7.94 |
778667 |
32.2 |
|
CV (%) |
4.40 |
14.3 |
22.3 |
0.38 |
— |
1.34 |
— |
|
9.60 |
1 |
0.0802 |
0.0515 |
0.0256 |
0.0524 |
20.5 |
426400 |
62.9 |
2 |
0.0817 |
0.0555 |
0.0194 |
0.0522 |
20.8 |
418600 |
63.5 |
|
3 |
0.0821 |
0.0559 |
0.0203 |
0.0528 |
19.9 |
436400 |
62.0 |
|
Mean |
0.0813 |
0.0543 |
0.0218 |
0.0525 |
20.4 |
427133 |
62.8 |
|
CV (%) |
1.23 |
4.48 |
15.37 |
0.58 |
— |
2.09 |
— |
|
16.8 |
1 |
0.0582 |
0.0515 |
0.0256 |
0.0377 |
42.8 |
141000 |
87.7 |
2 |
0.0562 |
0.0555 |
0.0194 |
0.0314 |
52.4 |
85810 |
92.5 |
|
3 |
0.0821 |
0.0559 |
0.0203 |
0.0341 |
48.3 |
106800 |
90.7 |
|
Mean |
0.0655 |
0.0543 |
0.0218 |
0.0344 |
47.8 |
111203 |
90.3 |
|
CV (%) |
22.00 |
4.5 |
15.4 |
9.19 |
— |
25.1 |
— |
|
30.0 |
1 |
0.0063 |
0.0067 |
0.0037 |
0.0056 |
91.5 |
4940 |
99.6 |
2 |
0.0068 |
0.0019 |
0.0127 |
0.0071 |
89.2 |
6700 |
99.4 |
|
3 |
0.0071 |
0.0063 |
0.0056 |
0.0063 |
90.4 |
5780 |
99.5 |
|
Mean |
0.0067 |
0.0050 |
0.0073 |
0.0063 |
90.4 |
5807 |
99.5 |
|
CV (%) |
6.03 |
53.3 |
65.0 |
11.9 |
— |
15.2 |
— |
“—”: not applicable
Description of key information
A reliable toxicity test is available.
Based on the growth rate inhibition, the 72h ErC50 was determined to be 16.1 mg/L and the 72h ErC10 was determined to be 7.57 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for freshwater algae:
- 16.1 mg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
- 7.57 mg/L
Additional information
One reliable key study is available for this endpoint. In this study, the growth inhibition effect of Lithium cryolite to Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was determined in a 72 hours test according to the OECD TG 201 and under GLP.
During the pre-test, a white precipitation was observed in the test solution of the treatment groups. The test substance (molecular formula: Li3AlF6) contains aluminum (Al) element, so the precipitation could result from the formation of low soluble salts, i.e., the reaction product between aluminum and anions present in the test water. The test solution of each treatment was prepared at its respective nominal concentration: a certain amount of the test substance was added into the alga medium, and stirred (via magnetic stirrer) for 72h at 500 rpm in the dark followed by filtration using a 0.45μm nitrocellulose membrane.
Based on the results of the range-finding test, five nominal concentrations of 3.00 mg/L, 5.40 mg/L, 9.60 mg/L, 16.8 mg/L and 30.0mg/L (geometric mean measured concentrations of fluoride: 2.14 mg/L, 3.66 mg/L, 6.20 mg/L, 10.4 mg/L and 17.9 mg/L; those of aluminum: 0.0437 mg/L, 0.121 mg/L, 0.148 mg/L, 0.476 mg/L and 1.58 mg/L) were used in the definitive test. One control group of alga medium was run in addition to the treatment groups. Three replicates were included at each concentration as well as six replicates for the blank control .The test duration was 72h.
The mean biomass increase in the control cultures was 116, which is higher than the validity criterion of at least 16 within the 72-hour test period. The mean coefficient of variation for section-by-section specific growth rates in the control cultures was 24.9%, which was below 35%. The coefficient of variation of average specific growth rates during the whole test period in replicate control cultures was 2.43%, which was below 7%. Hence, the test was considered to be valid.
The measured concentrations of fluoride (F) analysed by ion chromatography (IC) for all treatment groups varied within ±20% from their initial concentrations (-7.00%-14.5%). The measured concentration of aluminum (Al) analysed by ICP-MS also varied within ±20% (-9.06%-15.1%) except the exposure concentration at 5.40 mg/L.
Since the test substance is a metal compound consisting of several elements (Li, Al and F), the results were calculated using the nominal concentrations in order to reflect the toxicity of the test substance. Based on average specific growth rate, the 72h-ErC10 value of the test substance to Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was 7.57 mg/L (95% confidence limits: 1.46 mg/L–11.0 mg/L), and the 72h-ErC50 was 16.1 mg/L (11.3 mg/L–23.8 mg/L) . Based on yield, the 72h-EyC10 was 2.44 mg/L (0.177 mg/L– 4.17 mg/L), and the 72h-EyC50 was 6.96 mg/L (3.95 mg/L–11.4 mg/L).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.