Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 306-549-5 | CAS number: 97281-48-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
The genotoxicity of hydrogenated soya phosphatidylcholine was investigated in the Salmonella typhimurium (Ames test) and Escherichia coli Reverse mutation Assay. The study was conducted according to the OECD Guidelines 471/472 and following GLP.
Hydrogenated soya phosphatidylcholine caused no mutagenic effects at concentrations ranging from 8-5000 µg/plate
Data on mammalian cells are not available for Phosphatidylcholines, soya, hydrogenated. A weight of evidence approach with data on non-hydrogenated lecithins, which are very similar in structure and similar behaviour can be considered.
Based on the studies described in the assessment on similar lecithins, there are no indications of genotoxic activity in any of the tested lecithins. For further details, please refer to the weight of evidence assessment attached in the specific endpoint.
Based in the above it is concluded that the compound phosphatidylcholines, soya, hydrogenated is not genotoxic.
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1995.07.28
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 472 (Genetic Toxicology: Escherichia coli, Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Batch no. 42000100
white crystalline powder
expiry date 7/1996 - Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 10-10.000 µg/plate. No bacteriotoxic effects were observed however precipitation in the range from 1000-10.000 µg/plate therefore the following concentrations were applied:
8, 40, 200, 1000 and 5000 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- ethanol
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- sodium azide
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- other: 4-nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine and 2-aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- The positive controls (without the S 9 mix):
sodium azide (10µg/plate used for TA 1535 and TA 100) ,
9-aminoacridine hydrochloride (50µg/plate used for TA 1537)
4-nitro-1,2 phenylene diamine (10µg/plate used for TA 1537 and TA 98)
and N-ethyl N-nitro nitrosguanidin (5 µg/plate used for E. coli WP2 uvrA and pKM101)
The positive control 2-aminoantracene (3 and 40 µg/plate) was used for positive control for tests with S9 metabolic activation
Negative control: Solvent without test article - Evaluation criteria:
- Criteria for acceptance of assay:
- The negative controls had to be within the expected range as defined by published data (Maron and Ames 1983)
- The positive controls had to show sufficient effects as defined by the laboratory's experience
- The titer determination had to reveal a sufficient bacterial density in the suspension
Assessment of mutagenicity and baceriotoxicity:
A reproducible and dose-related increase of mutants counts for at least one strain is considered positive
For TA 98, TA 1535, WP2 uvrA and WP2 CM a twofold increase of revernants compared to the negative controls should be reached, whereas for TA 1537 a threefold increase should be attained. For TA 100 a 1.5-fold increase is regarded as an indication of potential mutagenicity. Otherwise the results are considered to be negative.
The criterion for a biologically significant bacteriotoxic effect is a reduction in the number of colonies/plate or revernants/plate or in background growth by more than 50% relative to the respective negative control. - Statistics:
- NA
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Hydrogenated soya phosphatidylcholine caused no mutagenic effects at concentrations ranging from 8-5000 µg/plate
- Remarks on result:
- other: No mutagenic nor bacteriotoxic effects at concentrations ranging from 8-5000 µg/plate
- Conclusions:
- Hydrogenated soya phosphatidylcholine caused no mutagenic effects at concentrations ranging from 8-5000 µg/plate.
- Executive summary:
Hydrogenated soya phosphatidylcholine was investigated in the Salmonella typhimurium (Ames test) and Escherichia coli Reverse mutation Assay for point mutations using Salmonella Typhimurium LT2 mutants and two E.coli WP2 mutants. These two tester strains were the histidine auxotrophic Salmonella strains TA1535, TA 1537, TA 98, Ta 100 and the trypto auxotrophic E. coli strains WP2 uvrA and WP2 uvr (pkM101). The study was conducted according to the OECD Guidelines 471/472 and following GLP.
Hydrogenated soya phosphatidylcholine caused no mutagenic effects at concentrations ranging from 8-5000 µg/plate.
In the positive control the mutant counts increased to more than twice the value of the negative controls, demonstrating that the system was highly sensitive.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- other: Weight of evidence analysis based on expert evaluated data on the group of lecithins
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: based on expert group reviews and published data
- Justification for type of information:
- Data on this endpoint are not available for Phosphatidylcholines, soya, hydrogenated.
As the substance belongs to the group of lecithins that are commonly used in cosmetics and used as food ingredient, reviews and expert group assessments of the substances are considered the most valid data available. In order to combine data on several similar substances an overall weight of evidence approach is used for the assessment. In order to assess the in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells of hydrogenated phosphatidylcholines, gene mutation studies in mammalian cells with non-hydrogenated lecithins, which are very similar in structure and similar behaviour can be considered. In the present analysis, data on phosphatidylcholines and phospatidylserines are used.
The group of lecithins has been evaluated by the expert groups EFSA and CIR, where this approach was also used. The reports are attached below. - Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The conclusion is based on a collection of data performed equivalent or similar to relevant guidelines. However, details on methods may vary. Please refer to attached weight of evidence document.
- Type of assay:
- other: Several assays was applied. Please see attached weight of evidence document for further details
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- For more details, please see attached weight of evidence document.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- other: Human embryonic epithelium (EUE) cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- other: Cultured human epithelioid cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Conclusions:
- Based on the studies available in the present analysis it is concluded that the compound phosphatidylcholines, soya, hydrogenated is not genotoxic.
- Executive summary:
Several studies on genetic toxicity are described with different versions of lecithin. All studies of reverse mutation assays with bacteria using lecithins are negative, including one study with hydrogenated lecithin.
Unscheduled DNA synthesis was investigated in human embryonic epithelium (EUE) cells exposed to a multivitamin preparation containing lecithin (50 mg/ml). No indication of inductionofunscheduled DNA synthesis was found.
Two studies were performed on the genotoxic potential of phosphatidylserine from bovine brain tissue (BC-PS). No genotoxicity was found in either mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells or cultured human epithelioid cells (HELA S3). All tests were carried out with and without metabolic activation. Further, an in vivo micronucleus test in mice was performed. No cytogenetic damage was detected.
Based on the studies described above on similar lecithins, there are no indications of mutagenic activity in any of the tested lecithins. Based on an overall weight of evidence approach, it is therefore concluded that the compound phosphatidylcholines, soya, hydrogenated is not mutagenic.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- other: Weight of evidence analysis based on expert evaluated data on the group of lecithins
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: based on expert group reviews and published data
- Justification for type of information:
- Data on this endpoint are not available for Phosphatidylcholines, soya, hydrogenated.
As the substance belongs to the group of lecithins that are commonly used in cosmetics and used as food ingredient, reviews and expert group assessments of the substances are considered the most valid data available. In order to combine data on several similar substances an overall weight of evidence approach is used for the assessment.
In order to assess the cytogenicity in mammalian cells of hydrogenated phosphatidylcholines, studies in mammalian cells with non-hydrogenated lecithins, which are very similar in structure and similar behaviour can be considered. In the present analysis, data on phosphatidylcholines and phospatidylserines are used.
The group of lecithins has been evaluated by the expert groups EFSA and CIR, where this approach was also used. The reports are attached below. - Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The conclusion is based on a collection of data performed equivalent or similar to relevant guidelines. However, details on methods may vary. Please refer to attached weight of evidence document.
- Type of assay:
- other: Several assays was applied. Please see attached weight of evidence document for further details
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- For more details, please see attached weight of evidence document.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Based on the studies available in the present analysis it is concluded that the compound phosphatidylcholines, soya, hydrogenated is not genotoxic.
- Executive summary:
Several studies on genetic toxicity are described with different versions of lecithin. All studies of reverse mutation assays with bacteria using lecithins are negative, including one study with hydrogenated lecithin.
Regarding cytogenicity, chromosomal aberration (OECD 473) was investigated in Chinese hamster lung fibroblast cells
exposed to purified phosphatidylinositol from soya. No chromosomal aberrations were detected.
One study was performed on the genotoxic potential of phosphatidylserine from bovine brain tissue (BC-PS). No chromosomal damage was found in human cultured lymphocytes. All tests were carried out with and without metabolic activation. Further, an in vivo micronucleus test in mice was performed. No cytogenetic damage was detected.
Based on the studies described above on similar lecithins, there are no indications of genotoxic activity in any of the tested lecithins. Based on an overall weight of evidence approach, it is therefore concluded that the compound phosphatidylcholines, soya, hydrogenated does no induce cytogenetic damage.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
The genotoxicity of hydrogenated soya phosphatidylcholine was investigated in the Salmonella typhimurium (Ames test) and Escherichia coli Reverse mutation Assay. The study was conducted according to the OECD Guidelines 471/472 and following GLP.
Hydrogenated soya phosphatidylcholine caused no mutagenic effects at concentrations ranging from 8-5000 µg/plate
Data on mammalian cells are not available for Phosphatidylcholines, soya, hydrogenated. A weight of evidence approach with data on non-hydrogenated lecithins, which are very similar in structure and similar behaviour can be considered.
Based on the studies described in the assessment on similar lecithins, there are no indications of genotoxic activity in any of the tested lecithins.For further details, please refer to the weight of evidence assessment attached in the specific endpoint.
Based in the above it is concluded that the compound phosphatidylcholines, soya, hydrogenated is not genotoxic.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.