Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
12 Sept - 11 Oct 2019
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2019
Report date:
2019

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 2019
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 2012
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, Klimaschutz, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, Wiesbaden, Germany

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Sodium 2-stearoyllactate
EC Number:
246-929-7
EC Name:
Sodium 2-stearoyllactate
Cas Number:
25383-99-7
Molecular formula:
This reference substance is a UVCB of the NCS type. It is a complex mixture of compounds and therefore molecular formula, molecular weight, SMILES, InChI and structural formula cannot be given.
IUPAC Name:
sodium 2-hydroxy-2-methyl-3-oxoicosanoate

In vitro test system

Test system:
human skin model
Source species:
human
Cell type:
non-transformed keratinocytes
Cell source:
other: EpiDermTM (EPI-200)
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on test system:
RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: EpiDerm™ (EPI-200-SIT) (MatTek Corporation, 82105 Bratislava, Slovakia)
- Tissue batch number(s): 30830
- Date of initiation of testing: 12 Sept 2019

TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 35 min at 37 ± 1.5 °C and 5 ± 0.5% CO2 in Dulbecco's Minimum Essential Medium (DMEM) followed by 25 min in a sterile bench at room temperature
- Temperature of post-treatment incubation: approx. 42 h at 37 ± 1.5 °C and 5 ± 0.5% CO2 in DMEM

REMOVAL OF TEST MATERIAL AND CONTROLS
- Volume and number of washing steps: rinsed with Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) several times

MTT DYE USED TO MEASURE TISSUE VIABILITY AFTER TREATMENT / EXPOSURE
- MTT concentration: 300 μl/well
- Incubation time: 3 h ± 5 min
- Spectrophotometer: microplate reader (Versamax® Molecular Devices, Software SoftMax Pro Enterprise version 4.7.1)
- Wavelength: 570 nm

FUNCTIONAL MODEL CONDITIONS WITH REFERENCE TO HISTORICAL DATA
- Viability: The quality of the EpiDerm™ tissue was assessed by an MTT cell viability test. The determined OD (540 - 570 nm) was 1.946 ± 0.146 (acceptance criteria: 1.0 - 3.0).
- Barrier function: The barrier function was assessed by determination of the exposure time required to reduce tissue viability by 50% (ET-50) upon application of 100 µL of 1% Triton X-100. The ET-50 value was determined to be 5.05 h (acceptance criteria: 4.77-8.72 h).
- Contamination: The cells used to produce the EpiDerm™ tissue were screened for the presence of viruses, bacteria, yeast and other fungi. No contamination was detected.

NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES: 3

CONTROL TISSUES USED IN CASE OF MTT DIRECT INTERFERENCE
Since the test substance did not directly reduce the MTT solution, an additional functional check was not performed.

NUMBER OF INDEPENDENT TEST SEQUENCES / EXPERIMENTS TO DERIVE FINAL PREDICTION: single experiment

PREDICTION MODEL / DECISION CRITERIA (choose relevant statement)
- The test substance is considered to be irritant or corrosive to skin if the viability after 1 h exposure is ≤ 50%.
- The test substance is considered to be non-irritant to skin if the viability after 1 h exposure is > 50%.
Control samples:
yes, concurrent negative control
yes, concurrent positive control
Amount/concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 25 mg (corresponding to 39.7 mg/cm2) + 25 µL DPBS
Duration of treatment / exposure:
35 min at 37 °C and 25 min at RT
Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
Approx. 42 h
Number of replicates:
Triplicates for each treatment and control group

Results and discussion

In vitro

Results
Irritation / corrosion parameter:
% tissue viability
Remarks:
mean value of 3 tissues
Run / experiment:
1 h exposure
Value:
100.16
Vehicle controls validity:
not applicable
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Other effects / acceptance of results:
OTHER EFFECTS:
- Direct-MTT reduction: Since the test substance did not directly reduce MTT, an additional test with freeze-killed or viable tissues was not performed.
- Colour interference with MTT: The test substance did not change the colour, when mixed with deionised water and thus passed the colour interference pre-test. Also its intrinsic colour was not intensive.

DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY:
The technical proficiency of the test facility was demonstrated. Appropriate data are provided in 'Any other information on results incl. tables' below.

ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: The mean OD of the tissue replicates treated with the negative control was ≥ 0.8 and ≤ 2.8 for every exposure time (values between 1.689 and 1.783).
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: The mean viability of the tissue replicates treated with the positive control for 1 h was < 15% compared to the negative control (4.32%).
- Acceptance criteria met for variability between replicate measurements: The standard deviations between the three tissue percentage viability values of each group (test item, positive and negative controls) in the main test were below 18.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Details on results

Treatment Group

Tissue No.

OD 570 nm

Mean OD of 3 Wells

Mean OD of 3 Wells blank corrected

Mean OD of 3 tissues

Rel. Viability [%] Tissue 1, 2 + 3

Standard Deviation

Mean Rel. Viability [%]

Well 1

Well 2

Well 3

Blank

 

0.038

0.039

0.039

0.039

 

Negative Control

1

1.734

1.713

1.736

1.727

1.689

1.751

96.469

0.054

100.0

2

1.831

1.818

1.807

1.819

1.780

101.677

3

1.825

1.783

1.858

1.822

1.783

101.854

Positive Control

1

0.112

0.126

0.114

0.117

0.079

0.076

4.494

0.005

4.32

2

0.117

0.117

0.117

0.117

0.078

4.469

3

0.108

0.109

0.109

0.109

0.070

3.989

Test Item

1

1.861

1.795

1.783

1.813

1.774

1.753

101.336

0.082

100.16

2

1.708

1.702

1.694

1.701

1.663

94.982

3

1.838

1.886

1.864

1.862

1.824

104.175

 

Table 2: Historical control data

Positive Control; OD at 570 nm after exposure to 5% SDS solution in deionized water (MatTek)

Negative Control OD at 570 nm DPBS (MatTek)

Tissue Viability [%]

3.89

Mean OD

1.69

Standard Deviation

1.01 % points

Standard Deviation

0.19

Range of Viabilities

2.24 % - 6.19 %

Range of OD*

1.28 - 2

Mean OD

0.07

* should be 0.8 - 2.8 (OECD 439) or 1.0 - 2.5 (MatTek)

Standard Deviation

0.02

Range of OD

0.03 - 0.11

Data of 50 sets of controls shared between 195 studies performed from August 2015 until May 2019 (p.p.: percentage points)

 

Table 3: Technical proficiency

Proficiency Substance

Viability [%]

Category

Naphtalene acetic acid

101.7

No Cat.

Isopropanol

85.5

No Cat.

Methyl stearate

91.1

No Cat.

Heptyl butyrate

109.0

No Cat.

Hexyl salicylate

98.1

No Cat.

Cyclamen aldehyde

24.1

Cat. 2

1-Bromohexane

16.3

Cat. 2

Potassium hydroxide (5% aq.)

40.1

Cat. 2

1-Methyl-3-phenyl-1-piperazine

21.6

Cat. 2

Heptanal

20.6

Cat. 2

In vitro Skin Irritation Assay: OECD 439

Proficiency Data (March 2014, non-GLP) performed at ICCR-Roßdorf GmbH Study

Director: Dipl.-Ing. Andreas Heppenheimer

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of the conducted test, the test substance did not possess irritating properties towards reconstructed human epidermis tissue in the EpiDerm™ model.