Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: inhalation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
21-06-2016 to 29-09-2016
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
Guideline study performed under GLP. All relevant validity criteria were met. Minor deviation: Three males Group 3 were slightly outside ±20% (lower than) of the mean body weights of the Group 1 or Group 2 males. This was not considered to impact the validity of the study.
Justification for type of information:
Information as to the availability of the in vivo study is provided in 'attached justification'.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2016
Report date:
2016

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 403 (Acute Inhalation Toxicity)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Three males Group 3 were slightly outside ±20% (lower than) of the mean body weights of the Group 2 males. Not considered to impact the validity of the study.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.2 (Acute Toxicity (Inhalation))
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
See above
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
inspected: June 2015; signature: September 2015
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
(4E)-5,9-dimethyldec-4-enal; (4Z)-5,9-dimethyldec-4-enal
EC Number:
943-495-7
Cas Number:
689-65-6
Molecular formula:
C12H22O
IUPAC Name:
(4E)-5,9-dimethyldec-4-enal; (4Z)-5,9-dimethyldec-4-enal
Details on test material:
- Physical state: Liquid
- Storage condition of test material: Approximately 4 °C, in the dark
- Other: clear colourless

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Recognised supplier
- Age at study initiation: 8 - 12 weeks; females were nulliparous and non pregnant.
- Weight at study initiation: 200 - 350 g
- Fasting period before study: None.
- Housing: Housed in groups of up to five by sex in solid-floor polypropylene cages with stainless steel lids, furnished with softwood flakes provided with environmental enrichment items.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Certified diet from recognised supplier, provided ad libitum (except for exposure period period)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum (except for exposure period period)
- Acclimation period: At least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 - 25
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70%
- Air changes (per hr): > 15 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod: 12 h light / 12 h dark

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
inhalation: aerosol
Type of inhalation exposure:
nose only
Vehicle:
air
Remarks:
Oxygen concentration (%) was monitored during the study by an electronic oxygen analyzer. The test atmospheres were generated to contain at least 19% oxygen.
Details on inhalation exposure:
GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION
- Exposure apparatus: The test item was aerosolized using a metal concentric jet nebulizer located at the top of the exposure chamber. The nebulizer was connected to a glass syringe attached to an infusion pump, which provided a continuous supply of test item under pressure, and to a metered compressed air supply.
- Exposure chamber volume: approximately 30 litres (dimensions: 28 cm diameter x 50 cm high)
- Method of holding animals in test chamber: Prior to the day of exposure each rat was acclimatized (for approximately 2 hours) to a tapered polycarbonate restraining tube. During the exposure period, each rat was individually held in a tapered, polycarbonate restraining tube fitted onto a single tier of the exposure chamber and sealed by means of a rubber ‘O’ ring. Only the nose of each animal was exposed to the test atmosphere.
- Source and rate of air: filtered air; chamber flow rate was maintained at 60 L/min providing 120 air changes per hour.
- Method of conditioning air: Compressed air was supplied by means of an oil free compressor and passed through a water trap and respiratory quality filters before it was introduced to the nebulizer.
- System of generating particulates/aerosols: metal concentric jet nebulizer; the concentration within the exposure chamber was controlled by adjusting the rate of the infusion pump and air flow settings into the chamber. The chamber flow rate was maintained between 50 to 60 L/min providing 100 to 120 air changes per hour. 60 L/min in group 1 and 2 and 50 L/min in group 3.
- Method of particle size determination: Particle size was determined using a cascade impactor. The device consisted of six impactors stages. The mean amount for each stage was used to determine the cumulative amount below each cut-off point size to calculate the proportional (%) aerosol of defined size ranges. The resulting values were converted to probits and plotted against Log10 cut-point size. From this plot, the Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) was determined (as the 50% point) and the geometric standard deviation was calculated. In addition the proportion (%) of aerosol less than 4 μm (considered to be the inhalable fraction) was determined.
- Treatment of exhaust air: The extract from the exposure chamber passed through a ‘scrubber’ trap and was connected with a high efficiency filter to a metered exhaust system. The chamber was maintained under negative pressure. A schematic of the dynamic (continuous flow) system is presented in the full study report.
- Temperature, humidity, in air chamber: The temperature and relative humidity inside the exposure chamber were measured by an electronic thermometer/humidity meter: 19 to 20 °C and 30 to 70%.

TEST ATMOSPHERE
- Brief description of analytical method used: The test atmosphere was sampled nine times during the exposure period. The sampling procedure involved 2 to 10 litres (dependent on target concentration) of test atmosphere being drawn through a glass fibre filter. Each filter was then submitted for chemical analysis by gas chromatography (GC). The test filter samples received were extracted with methanol to achieve the working concentration. Blank filters were accurately fortified with known amounts of test item and either analysed without further procedure or purged with nitrogen prior to analysis. A range of standard solutions were prepared in methanol from a stock solution of 1.084 mg/mL by serial dilution covering the concentration range 0.0542 to 0.1626 mg/mL. Full details of the analytical method are provided in the full study report. The linearity of the analytical system used for sample analyses was demonstrated with a good relationship between peak areas measured and working standard concentrations. The regression coefficients calculated were found to be 0.9999. The fortified samples of filters were found to have a recovery value of ± 10% of the fortification. The results indicate the accurate use of the test item and filters during this study. Working solutions of the test item were shown to be sufficiently stable to complete the analysis without deterioration of the analyte. Full details of the analytical method are provided in the full study report.
- Samples taken from breathing zone: yes

TEST ATMOSPHERE
- Particle size distribution: The particle size of the generated atmosphere inside the exposure chamber was determined three times during each exposure period using a cascade impactor. The particle size distribution for each group is reported in table 1.
- MMAD (Mass median aerodynamic diameter) / GSD (Geometric st. dev.): The Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) was determined and is reported for each group in table 1.
Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
yes
Duration of exposure:
4 h
Concentrations:
Following an appropriate equilibration period three groups were subjected to a single exposure to the test item for a period of four hours. Based on the expected toxicity of the test item, a target concentration of 5.0 mg/L was used for the first exposure. Further concentrations were selected after consideration of the results of the previous exposure. Full details are provided in table 2.
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5 per sex per dose
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days (for groups 1, 2 and 3); for group 3 the observation period was extended to day 28 so as to assess full recovery.
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Clinical signs at hourly intervals during exposure, immediately on removal from the restraining tubes at the end of exposure, one hour after termination of exposure and subsequently once daily for up to fourteen days. Any evidence of mortality or overt toxicity was recorded at each observation. Individual body weights were recorded on arrival, prior to treatment on the day of exposure and on Days 1, 3, 7 and 14 or after mortality. Group 3 was also examined once daily for observations on days 15 - 28 and bodyweights taken on days 21 and 28 during the extended recovery period.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes (and in the event of any mortalities) for suvivors on day 14 and/or day 28 (group 3).
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight,organ weights, and any other relevant toxicological effects were reported.
Statistics:
Using the mortality data obtained, an estimate of the acute inhalation median lethal concentration (LC50) was calculated using validated data analysis software which utilized Log-Logistic (Logit) regression models in order to calculate the LC50 values. LC50 values and 95% confidence limits were calculated for males and females separately.

Results and discussion

Effect levelsopen allclose all
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
3.05 mg/L air
Based on:
test mat.
95% CL:
> 2.9 - < 3.2
Exp. duration:
4 h
Remarks on result:
other: Effect levels based on analytically confirmed: mean achieved concentrations for each exposure/sex groups
Sex:
male
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
3.09 mg/L air
Based on:
test mat.
95% CL:
> 0.78 - < 5.41
Exp. duration:
4 h
Remarks on result:
other: Effect levels based on analytically confirmed: mean achieved concentrations for each exposure/sex groups
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
3 mg/L air
Based on:
test mat.
95% CL:
> 1.5 - < 4.5
Exp. duration:
4 h
Remarks on result:
other: Effect levels based on analytically confirmed: mean achieved concentrations for each exposure/sex groups
Mortality:
Mortalities are reported in table 3.
Clinical signs:
other: Common abnormalities noted during the study included decreased respiratory rate, sneezing, lethargy, red/brown staining around the snout, hunched posture, pilo-erection and wet fur. There were frequent instances of labored respiration, occasional instanc
Body weight:
In group 2, 1.04 mg/L: All males and females exhibited body weight losses on Day 1 post-exposure. All males exhibited body weight gains during the remainder of the recovery period with the exception of two males which showed a slightly reduced gain from Days 1 to 3 post-exposure. These were in the ranges expected and considered normal for this type of study. One female exhibited a body weight loss from Days 3 to 7 post-exposure and two females exhibited body weight losses during the final week of the recovery period.
In group 3, 3.05 mg/L: All males and females exhibited body weight losses on Day 1 post-exposure. All male survivors exhibited body weight gains during the remainder of the exposure period, with the exception of one male that showed a slightly reduced gain from days 3 to 7 of the recovery period. These were in the ranges expected and considered normal for this type of study. One female exhibited a body weight loss from Days 3 to 7 post-exposure. Both surviving females exhibited body weight losses or showed no body weight gain from Days 7 to 14 post-exposure. One of these females exhibited a further body weight loss from Days 14 to 21 post-exposure. Both surviving females exhibited body weight gains during the final week of the extended recovery period.
Gross pathology:
In group 2, 1.04 mg/L: No macroscopic abnormalities in three females; dark patches in lungs was seen in five males and two females.
In group 3, 3.05 mg/L: No macroscopic abnormalities in in three male survivors; dark patches in lungs was seen in two female survivors. In the mortalities, gaseous distension of the stomach, small and/or large intestine and/or dark patches in lung was observed.
In group 1: 5.00 mg/L: In the mortalities, gaseous distension of the stomach, small and/or large intestine and/or dark patches in lung and/or liver - dark was observed at necropsy.
Other findings:
- Other observations: The respiratory tract was subjected to a detailed macroscopic examination for signs of irritancy or local toxicity during necropsy.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1. Characteristics of the achieved atmosphere:

Group Number

Mean Achieved Atmosphere Concentration (mg/L)

Mean Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (µm)

Inhalable Fraction

(% <4 µm)

Geometric Standard Deviation

1

5.00

2.25

76.7

2.21

2

1.04

2.19

77.8

2.21

3

3.05

2.17

78.2

2.21

 

Table 2. Mean achieved atmosphere concentrations:

Group Number

Atmosphere Concentration

Mean Achieved (mg/L)

Standard Deviation

Nominal (mg/L)

1

5.00

0.14

13.1

2

1.04

0.07

2.80

3

3.05

0.09

8.72

 

Table 3. Mortality data summary:

Group Number

Mean Achieved Atmosphere Concentration

(mg/L)

Deaths

Male

Female

Total

1

5.00

5/5

5/5

10/10

2

1.04

0/5

0/5

0/10

3

3.05

2/5

3/5

5/10

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 4 based on GHS criteria
Remarks:
Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of this study, the inhalation LC50 (male/female) was: 3.05 (C.I. 2.90 – 3.20) mg/L; LC50 (male): 3.09 (C.I. 0.78 – 5.41) mg/L and LC50 (female): 3.00 (C.I. 1.50 – 4.50) mg/L within the RCCHan WIST rat.
Executive summary:

The study was performed according to OECD TG 403 and EU Method B.2 in accordance with GLP to assess the acute inhalation toxicity of the test item. Three groups of ten RccHanTM : WIST strain rats (five males and five females) were exposed to an aerosol atmosphere of the test item. The groups were exposed for four hours using a nose only exposure system, followed by a fourteen day observation period (group 1 and 2) or a twenty-eight day extended observation period (group 3). The mean achieved atmosphere concentrations were as follows: Group 1: 5.00 mg/L, Group 2: 1.04 mg/L and Group 3: 3.05 mg/L. The characteristics of the achieved atmosphere where Mean Mass Median Diameter (particle size) and Inhalable Fraction <4 μm: Group 1: 2.25 μm and 76.7%; Group 2: 2.19 μm and 77.8% and Group 3: 2.17 μm and 78.2%. The Geometric Standard Deviation was 2.21 in all groups, respectively. There was 5 male and 5 female mortalities in Group 1, no mortalities in Group 2 and 2 male and 3 female mortalities in Group 3. Within Group 2, all males and females exhibited body weight losses or showed no body weight gain on Day 1 post-exposure. All males exhibited body weight gains during the remainder of the recovery period with the exception of two males which showed a slightly reduced gain from Days 1 to 3 post-exposure. These were in the ranges expected and considered normal for this type of study. One female exhibited a body weight loss from Days 3 to 7 post-exposure and two females exhibited body weight losses during the final week of the recovery period. Applicant assessment indicated these were not significant as they were not combined with clinical signs or abnormal necropsy. Within Group 3, all surviving males and females exhibited body weight losses on Day 1 post-exposure. All male survivors exhibited body weight gains during the remainder of the exposure period, with the exception of one male that showed a slightly reduced gain from days 3 to 7 of the recovery period. These were in the ranges expected and considered normal for this type of study. One female exhibited a body weight loss from Days 3 to 7 post-exposure. Both surviving females exhibited body weight losses or showed no body weight gain from Days 7 to 14 post-exposure. One of these females exhibited a further body weight loss from Days 14 to 21 post-exposure. Both surviving females exhibited body weight gains during the final week of the extended recovery period. In Group 2 clinical observations for all males and females appeared normal at day 2 post exposure. In Group 3 survivors (male/female) recovered such that no significant observations were apparent on Day 5 post-exposure. Three surviving males indicated a deterioration in condition exhibiting observations again from Day 6, subsequently, the surviving males appeared normal on Day 9 post-exposure, however two of these males deteriorated slightly on Day 20 (decreased respiratory rate) but subsequently appeared normal again on Day 26. Two surviving females appeared normal from Days 8 or 9 post-exposure but showed a deterioration in condition on Day 11 with observations persisting in one of these females until the end of the extended recovery period (decreased respiratory rate and laboured respiration). One other surviving female appeared normal for one day (Day 14) and then on Days 27 and 28 post-exposure. During necropsy in Group 2 no macroscopic abnormalities were seen in three females; dark patches in lungs was seen in five males and two females. In Group 3, no macroscopic abnormalities were observed in in three male survivors dark patches in lungs was seen in two female survivors. In the mortalities, gaseous distension of the stomach, small and/or large intestine and/or dark patches in lung was observed. Under the conditions of this study, the inhalation LC50 (male/female) was: 3.05 (C.I. 2.90 – 3.20) mg/L; LC50 (male): 3.09 (C.I. 0.78 – 5.41) mg/L and LC50 (female): 3.00 (C.I. 1.50 – 4.50) mg/L within the RCCHan WIST rat. The test item was classified as Acute Inhalation Toxicity: Category 4 according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008.