Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1996
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1996

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
7 experimental animals, 3 control animals
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
7 experimental animals, 3 control animals
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
The maximisation test was already available and therefore a LLNA test was considered unnecessary.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
(2,4-dioxo-1,3-benzoxazin-7-yl) ethyl carbonate
EC Number:
605-404-6
Cas Number:
16535-55-0
Molecular formula:
C11 H9 N O6
IUPAC Name:
(2,4-dioxo-1,3-benzoxazin-7-yl) ethyl carbonate

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
not specified

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
other: 0.1N NaOH
Concentration / amount:
10% concentration intradermally injected,
50% concentration epidermally exposed
Adequacy of induction:
non-irritant substance, but skin pre-treated with 10% SDS
Challenge
No.:
#1
Route:
epicutaneous, semiocclusive
Vehicle:
other: 0.1N NaOH
Concentration / amount:
50% concentration
No. of animals per dose:
7
Details on study design:
Based on a test substance pretest, 0.1N NaOH was selected as the most suitable vehicle for V194024.
Test concentrations selected for the main study were based on the results of a preliminary study using four animals. In the main study, seven animals were intradermally injected with a 10% concentration and epidermally exposed to a 50% concentration, while three control animals were similarly treated, but with 0.1 N NaOH only. Since no signs of irritation were observed at the concentration selected for the epidermal induction, all animals were treated with 10% SDS approximately 24 hours before the epidermal induction.
Two weeks after the epidermal application all animals were challenged with a 50% test substance concentration and 0.1N NaOH. The challenge reactions were assessed 24 and 48 hours after bandage removal.
Challenge controls:
3 animals
Positive control substance(s):
no

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
50% concentration
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
7
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
50% concentration
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
7
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0.1 N NaOH
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
3
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0.1 N NaOH
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
3
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
no indication of skin sensitisation
Group:
positive control
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
No evidence was obtained that V194024 caused skin hypersensitivity in the guinea pig. This result lead to a sensitisation rate of 0%, indicating that V194024 need not be regarded as a potential skin sensitiser.